Perturbing Neural Representations of Working Memory with Task-irrelevant Interruption.

Nicole Hakim, Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld, Edward Awh, Edward K Vogel
Author Information
  1. Nicole Hakim: University of Chicago.
  2. Tobias Feldmann-Wüstefeld: University of Southampton.
  3. Edward Awh: University of Chicago.
  4. Edward K Vogel: University of Chicago.

Abstract

Working memory maintains information so that it can be used in complex cognitive tasks. A key challenge for this system is to maintain relevant information in the face of task-irrelevant perturbations. Across two experiments, we investigated the impact of task-irrelevant interruptions on neural representations of working memory. We recorded EEG activity in humans while they performed a working memory task. On a subset of trials, we interrupted participants with salient but task-irrelevant objects. To track the impact of these task-irrelevant interruptions on neural representations of working memory, we measured two well-characterized, temporally sensitive EEG markers that reflect active, prioritized working memory representations: the contralateral delay activity and lateralized alpha power (8-12 Hz). After interruption, we found that contralateral delay activity amplitude momentarily sustained but was gone by the end of the trial. Lateralized alpha power was immediately influenced by the interrupters but recovered by the end of the trial. This suggests that dissociable neural processes contribute to the maintenance of working memory information and that brief irrelevant onsets disrupt two distinct online aspects of working memory. In addition, we found that task expectancy modulated the timing and magnitude of how these two neural signals responded to task-irrelevant interruptions, suggesting that the brain's response to task-irrelevant interruption is shaped by task context.

References

  1. Mem Cognit. 2019 Nov;47(8):1481-1497 [PMID: 31236821]
  2. Cereb Cortex. 2010 Apr;20(4):859-72 [PMID: 19648173]
  3. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2009 Feb;35(1):1-16 [PMID: 19170466]
  4. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2007 Apr;17(2):177-84 [PMID: 17379501]
  5. J Neurosci. 2006 Sep 13;26(37):9494-502 [PMID: 16971533]
  6. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Aug;30(8):1185-1196 [PMID: 29694260]
  7. J Neurophysiol. 2016 Jan 1;115(1):168-77 [PMID: 26467522]
  8. Psychol Sci. 2019 Apr;30(4):526-540 [PMID: 30817220]
  9. J Neurosci. 2014 Apr 16;34(16):5658-66 [PMID: 24741056]
  10. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Aug;142(3):906-22 [PMID: 22984954]
  11. J Vis. 2013 May 06;13(3): [PMID: 23650629]
  12. J Neurophysiol. 2004 Jan;91(1):286-300 [PMID: 14523065]
  13. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 Jul;1424(1):256-267 [PMID: 29604084]
  14. Psychol Sci. 2013 Apr;24(4):550-6 [PMID: 23436786]
  15. Front Biosci. 2008 Jan 01;13:1182-91 [PMID: 17981622]
  16. Cereb Cortex. 2012 Jul;22(7):1554-63 [PMID: 21903593]
  17. Science. 2003 Jan 3;299(5603):81-6 [PMID: 12511644]
  18. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2012 Sep;38(5):1206-20 [PMID: 22409182]
  19. J Neurophysiol. 2010 Apr;103(4):1963-8 [PMID: 20147415]
  20. J Cogn Neurosci. 2015 Aug;27(8):1601-16 [PMID: 25811710]
  21. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2015 Aug;41(4):1153-65 [PMID: 26030438]
  22. Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2016 Mar;62:100-8 [PMID: 26802451]
  23. J Neurophysiol. 2016 Oct 1;116(4):1715-1727 [PMID: 27440249]
  24. J Cogn Neurosci. 2018 Feb;30(2):256-266 [PMID: 29040014]
  25. Mem Cognit. 2005 Mar;33(2):203-12 [PMID: 16028575]
  26. J Neurosci. 2000 Mar 15;20(6):RC63 [PMID: 10704517]
  27. Cereb Cortex. 2019 Feb 1;29(2):529-543 [PMID: 29365078]
  28. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2005 Oct;31(5):1039-60 [PMID: 16262497]
  29. Vis cogn. 2011 Aug;19(7):956-972 [PMID: 22053147]
  30. Nature. 2004 Apr 15;428(6984):748-51 [PMID: 15085132]
  31. Curr Biol. 2017 Oct 23;27(20):3216-3223.e6 [PMID: 29033335]
  32. Neuropsychologia. 2011 May;49(6):1401-6 [PMID: 21277880]
  33. Science. 2001 Mar 2;291(5509):1803-6 [PMID: 11230699]
  34. J Neurosci. 2015 Oct 14;35(41):14009-16 [PMID: 26468201]
  35. Nature. 2005 Nov 24;438(7067):500-3 [PMID: 16306992]
  36. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Dec;32(6):1436-51 [PMID: 17154783]

Grants

  1. R01 MH087214/NIMH NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Alpha Rhythm
Attention
Brain
Electroencephalography
Female
Humans
Male
Memory, Short-Term
Visual Perception
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0memorytask-irrelevantworkingtwoneuralinformationinterruptionsactivitytaskWorkingimpactrepresentationsEEGcontralateraldelayalphapowerinterruptionfoundendtrialmaintainscanusedcomplexcognitivetaskskeychallengesystemmaintainrelevantfaceperturbationsAcrossexperimentsinvestigatedrecordedhumansperformedsubsettrialsinterruptedparticipantssalientobjectstrackmeasuredwell-characterizedtemporallysensitivemarkersreflectactiveprioritizedrepresentations:lateralized8-12HzamplitudemomentarilysustainedgoneLateralizedimmediatelyinfluencedinterruptersrecoveredsuggestsdissociableprocessescontributemaintenancebriefirrelevantonsetsdisruptdistinctonlineaspectsadditionexpectancymodulatedtimingmagnitudesignalsrespondedsuggestingbrain'sresponseshapedcontextPerturbingNeuralRepresentationsMemoryTask-irrelevantInterruption

Similar Articles

Cited By