Return to Sports and Recreational Activity After Single-Stage Bilateral Short-Stem Total Hip Arthroplasty: 5-Year Results of a Prospective Observational Study.

Stefanie Donner, Philipp Rehbein, Michael Schneider, Joachim Pfeil, Philipp Drees, Karl Philipp Kutzner
Author Information
  1. Stefanie Donner: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, St Josefs Hospital Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany.
  2. Philipp Rehbein: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, St Josefs Hospital Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany.
  3. Michael Schneider: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, St Josefs Hospital Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany.
  4. Joachim Pfeil: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, St Josefs Hospital Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany.
  5. Philipp Drees: Department of Orthopaedics and Traumatology, University Medical Center, Johannes Gutenberg University Mainz, Mainz, Germany.
  6. Karl Philipp Kutzner: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Traumatology, St Josefs Hospital Wiesbaden, Wiesbaden, Germany.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Single-stage bilateral total hip arthroplasty (THA) is an alternative to staged unilateral THA in patients suffering from bilateral hip arthritis; however, there is still broad concern regarding the safety and reliability of this procedure. Short-stem THA has emerged in recent years. To date, no data are available on sports and recreational activity levels after single-stage bilateral short-stem THA in the general patient population.
HYPOTHESIS: Patients who have undergone single-stage bilateral short-stem THA return to a satisfying level of sports and recreational activity at midterm follow-up.
STUDY DESIGN: Case series; Level of evidence, 4.
METHODS: A total of 54 consecutive patients (108 hips) were prospectively included. Midterm follow-up was performed in 51 patients (94.4%). The Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC) score and the Harris Hip Score (HHS) were assessed clinically after a mean of 5.2 years. After a mean of 4.9 years, activity levels were assessed using the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale via a questionnaire. Additionally, a detailed evaluation of sports behavior was conducted using an additional questionnaire. Pain and satisfaction with sporting ability were assessed using a visual analog scale (VAS). Complications and revisions were documented.
RESULTS: Patients had a mean WOMAC score of 98.0 (range, 60.0-100.0) and HHS score of 97.8 (range, 65.0-100.0) at final follow-up. The mean UCLA activity score was 4.7 (range, 2.0-10.0). An increasing number of patients were active in sports at follow-up compared with before surgery (76.5% vs 60.8%, respectively); 2 patients (3.9%) stopped participating in sports on a regular basis, and 10 (19.6%) commenced with sports after surgery. The most popular activities before surgery were cycling (31.4%), hiking (29.4%), swimming (21.6%), and fitness/weight training (15.7%). At follow-up, most patients were engaged in cycling (35.3%) and fitness/weight training (33.3%), followed by swimming (25.5%) and hiking (19.6%). The duration (hours per week) and frequency (times per week) of sporting activities remained stable. The mean VAS pain level during sports was 1.3 (range, 0.0-7.0). No revision surgery had to be performed.
CONCLUSION: After single-stage bilateral short-stem THA, the study patients returned to satisfying levels of activity at midterm follow-up. Postoperatively, few patients were engaged in high-impact sports; however, more patients commenced with lower impact activities. Satisfaction with sporting abilities was high, and the complication rate in total was low.

Keywords

References

  1. Acta Orthop Belg. 2016 Aug;82(2):372-375 [PMID: 27682302]
  2. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Jun;38(6):1229-36 [PMID: 20223940]
  3. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2012 Nov;94(11 Suppl A):47-51 [PMID: 23118380]
  4. Orthopedics. 2013 Sep;36(9):700-7 [PMID: 24024994]
  5. ANZ J Surg. 2004 Jun;74(6):446-9 [PMID: 15191479]
  6. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1995 Nov;77(6):865-9 [PMID: 7593096]
  7. J Arthroplasty. 2015 Apr;30(4):600-6 [PMID: 25680446]
  8. Orthopedics. 1987 Oct;10(10):1447-52 [PMID: 3684792]
  9. Schweiz Z Sportmed. 1984 Mar;32(1):20-4 [PMID: 6719094]
  10. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2009 Mar;91(3):316-20 [PMID: 19258605]
  11. Hip Int. 2010 Oct-Dec;20(4):440-6 [PMID: 21157747]
  12. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2015 Apr 08;16:77 [PMID: 25887667]
  13. J Arthroplasty. 1999 Jun;14(4):439-45 [PMID: 10428224]
  14. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 1992 Jan;74(1):53-6 [PMID: 1732266]
  15. Hip Int. 2014 Oct 02;24 Suppl 10:S25-8 [PMID: 24970038]
  16. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2009 Apr;467(4):958-65 [PMID: 18587624]
  17. Oper Orthop Traumatol. 2017 Apr;29(2):180-192 [PMID: 28160028]
  18. Orthop Rev (Pavia). 2013 Mar 19;5(1):e4 [PMID: 23705062]
  19. Am J Sports Med. 2007 May;35(5):705-11 [PMID: 17218652]
  20. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):487-493 [PMID: 27639304]
  21. Acta Orthop Belg. 2000 Jun;66(3):265-71 [PMID: 11033917]
  22. Am J Sports Med. 2012 Feb;40(2):425-32 [PMID: 21993977]
  23. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2012 Oct;98(6 Suppl):S120-3 [PMID: 22939864]
  24. J Arthroplasty. 2017 Feb;32(2):689-695 [PMID: 27776901]
  25. Int J Sports Med. 2006 Jun;27(6):505-7 [PMID: 16729256]
  26. Hip Int. 2017 Mar 31;27(2):162-168 [PMID: 28218370]
  27. J Arthroplasty. 2007 Feb;22(2):171-5 [PMID: 17275629]
  28. Z Rheumatol. 1996 Jan-Feb;55(1):40-9 [PMID: 8868149]
  29. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2014 Oct 15;96(20):1742-52 [PMID: 25320202]
  30. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2008 Oct;90(10):2245-52 [PMID: 18829924]
  31. Int Orthop. 2015 Jul;39(7):1269-75 [PMID: 25522801]
  32. Dtsch Arztebl Int. 2011 Jul;108(27):463-8 [PMID: 21814521]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0patientssportsactivitybilateralTHAfollow-up0meantotalsingle-stagescorerangesurgeryhipyearslevelsshort-stem44%assessed2usingsporting6%activitiesarthroplastyhoweverrecreationalPatientssatisfyinglevelmidtermperformedWOMACHipHHSUCLAscalequestionnaireVAS600-1005%319commencedcyclinghikingswimmingfitness/weighttrainingengaged3%perweekBACKGROUND:Single-stagealternativestagedunilateralsufferingarthritisstillbroadconcernregardingsafetyreliabilityprocedureShort-stememergedrecentdatedataavailablegeneralpatientpopulationHYPOTHESIS:undergonereturnSTUDYDESIGN:CaseseriesLevelevidenceMETHODS:54consecutive108hipsprospectivelyincludedMidterm5194WesternOntarioMcMasterUniversitiesOsteoarthritisIndexHarrisScoreclinically59UniversityCaliforniaLosAngelesviaAdditionallydetailedevaluationbehaviorconductedadditionalPainsatisfactionabilityvisualanalogComplicationsrevisionsdocumentedRESULTS:9897865final70-10increasingnumberactivecompared76vs8%respectively9%stoppedparticipatingregularbasis10popular312921157%3533followed25durationhoursfrequencytimesremainedstablepain10-7revisionCONCLUSION:studyreturnedPostoperativelyhigh-impactlowerimpactSatisfactionabilitieshighcomplicationratelowReturnSportsRecreationalActivitySingle-StageBilateralShort-StemTotalArthroplasty:5-YearResultsProspectiveObservationalStudyoptimysshortstem

Similar Articles

Cited By