Multiplanar MRI-Based Predictive Model for Preoperative Assessment of Lymph Node Metastasis in Endometrial Cancer.

Xiaojuan Xu, Hailin Li, Siwen Wang, Mengjie Fang, Lianzhen Zhong, Wenwen Fan, Di Dong, Jie Tian, Xinming Zhao
Author Information
  1. Xiaojuan Xu: Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  2. Hailin Li: CAS Key Lab of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
  3. Siwen Wang: CAS Key Lab of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
  4. Mengjie Fang: CAS Key Lab of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
  5. Lianzhen Zhong: CAS Key Lab of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
  6. Wenwen Fan: Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.
  7. Di Dong: CAS Key Lab of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
  8. Jie Tian: CAS Key Lab of Molecular Imaging, Institute of Automation, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing, China.
  9. Xinming Zhao: Department of Diagnostic Imaging, National Cancer Center/National Clinical Research Center for Cancer/Cancer Hospital, Chinese Academy of Medical Sciences and Peking Union Medical College, Beijing, China.

Abstract

Assessment of lymph node metastasis (LNM) is crucial for treatment decision and prognosis prediction for endometrial cancer (EC). However, the sensitivity of the routinely used magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) is low in assessing normal-sized LNM (diameter, 0-0.8 cm). We aimed to develop a predictive model based on magnetic resonance (MR) images and clinical parameters to predict LNM in normal-sized lymph nodes (LNs). A total of 200 retrospective patients were enrolled and divided into a training cohort ( = 140) and a test cohort ( = 60). All patients underwent preoperative MRI and had pathological result of LNM status. In total, 4,179 radiomic features were extracted. Four models including a clinical model, a radiomic model, and two combined models were built. Area under the receiver operating characteristic (ROC) curves (AUC) and calibration curves were used to assess these models. Subgroup analysis was performed according to LN size. All patients underwent surgical staging and had pathological results. All of the four models showed predictive ability in LNM. One of the combined models, Model, consisting of radiomic features, LN size, and cancer antigen 125, showed the best discrimination ability on the training cohort [AUC, 0.892; 95% confidence interval [CI], 0.834-0.951] and test cohort (AUC, 0.883; 95% CI, 0.786-0.980). The subgroup analysis showed that this model also indicated good predictive ability in normal-sized LNs (0.3-0.8 cm group, accuracy = 0.846; <0.3 cm group, accuracy = 0.849). Furthermore, compared with the routinely preoperative MR report, the sensitivity and accuracy of this model had a great improvement. A predictive model was proposed based on MR radiomic features and clinical parameters for LNM in EC. The model had a good discrimination ability, especially for normal-sized LNs.

Keywords

References

  1. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Sep;118:81-87 [PMID: 31439263]
  2. Ann Oncol. 2019 Mar 1;30(3):431-438 [PMID: 30689702]
  3. Chin J Cancer Res. 2017 Feb;29(1):1-10 [PMID: 28373748]
  4. Oncologist. 2016 Apr;21(4):461-6 [PMID: 26961924]
  5. CA Cancer J Clin. 2018 Jan;68(1):7-30 [PMID: 29313949]
  6. Int J Gynecol Cancer. 2015 Mar;25(3):521-5 [PMID: 25621410]
  7. Cancer Imaging. 2016 May 09;16:11 [PMID: 27157039]
  8. Front Oncol. 2018 Sep 04;8:360 [PMID: 30234019]
  9. Stat Med. 2004 Jul 15;23(13):2109-23 [PMID: 15211606]
  10. Radiology. 2014 Oct;273(1):125-35 [PMID: 24893049]
  11. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 2008 Sep-Oct;32(5):764-8 [PMID: 18830107]
  12. Ann Nucl Med. 2016 Feb;30(2):104-13 [PMID: 26546334]
  13. Stat Med. 1996 Feb 28;15(4):361-87 [PMID: 8668867]
  14. J Cancer Res Clin Oncol. 2017 Dec;143(12):2555-2562 [PMID: 28840384]
  15. Eur J Radiol. 2019 Sep;118:231-238 [PMID: 31439247]
  16. Clin Cancer Res. 2018 Aug 1;24(15):3583-3592 [PMID: 29563137]
  17. Cancer Res. 2017 Nov 1;77(21):e104-e107 [PMID: 29092951]
  18. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2008 Jul;28(1):128-35 [PMID: 18581404]
  19. Cancer. 2017 Jan 1;123(2):263-272 [PMID: 28067948]
  20. Ann Oncol. 2013 Oct;24 Suppl 6:vi33-8 [PMID: 24078661]
  21. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2017 Mar;210:225-230 [PMID: 28068595]
  22. Semin Ultrasound CT MR. 2010 Oct;31(5):363-76 [PMID: 20974356]
  23. J Coll Physicians Surg Pak. 2016 Jan;26(1):13-7 [PMID: 26787024]
  24. J Gynecol Oncol. 2017 Nov;28(6):e78 [PMID: 29027396]
  25. Eur Radiol. 2018 Feb;28(2):582-591 [PMID: 28828635]
  26. Transl Oncol. 2018 Jun;11(3):815-824 [PMID: 29727831]
  27. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2017 Jan;136(1):58-63 [PMID: 28099710]
  28. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2015 Mar;94(3):266-73 [PMID: 25545203]
  29. J Med Imaging Radiat Oncol. 2014 Oct;58(5):538-46; quiz 648 [PMID: 25046775]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0model0LNMmodelsnormal-sizedpredictivecohort=radiomicabilitylymphcancermagneticresonancecmMRclinicalLNspatientsfeaturesshowedaccuracyAssessmentnodemetastasisendometrialECsensitivityroutinelyusedimagingMRI8basedparameterstotaltrainingtestunderwentpreoperativepathologicalcombinedcurvesAUCanalysisLNsizeModeldiscrimination95%goodgroupcrucialtreatmentdecisionprognosispredictionHoweverlowassessingdiameter0-0aimeddevelopimagespredictnodes200retrospectiveenrolleddivided14060resultstatus4179extractedFourincludingtwobuiltAreareceiveroperatingcharacteristicROCcalibrationassessSubgroupperformedaccordingsurgicalstagingresultsfourOneconsistingantigen125best[AUC892confidenceinterval[CI]834-0951]883CI786-0980subgroupalsoindicated3-0846<03849FurthermorecomparedreportgreatimprovementproposedespeciallyMultiplanarMRI-BasedPredictivePreoperativeLymphNodeMetastasisEndometrialCancerradiomics

Similar Articles

Cited By