Health literacy: exploring disparities among college students.

Jehad A Rababah, Mohammed M Al-Hammouri, Barbara L Drew, Mohammed Aldalaykeh
Author Information
  1. Jehad A Rababah: Adult Health Nursing Department, Faculty of Nursing, Jordan University of Science and Technology, P.O. Box 3030, Irbid, 22110, Jordan. jarababah@just.edu.jo. ORCID
  2. Mohammed M Al-Hammouri: Community and Mental Health Department, Faculty of Nursing, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.
  3. Barbara L Drew: College of Nursing, Kent State University, Kent, OH, USA.
  4. Mohammed Aldalaykeh: Community and Mental Health Department, Faculty of Nursing, Jordan University of Science and Technology, Irbid, Jordan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health literacy is a multidimensional concept that is considered a primary public health concern. This concept is often neglected in research, and the evidence regarding health literacy in college students is limited. The aim of this study was two-fold: to determine the needs and limitations of health literacy among college students and to explore the relationships among the nine dimensions of health literacy and sociodemographic factors, including age, gender, nationality, year of study, field of study, smoking status, history of chronic diseases, use of on-campus gym, and the intention to exercise on-campus.
METHODS: This study was conducted using a cross-sectional approach. A total of 520 college students participated in this study. The average age was 21.03 years (SD = 2.29), with 47.5% males and 52.5% females. Data were collected using a demographics questionnaire and the Health Literacy Questionnaire (HLQ). In addition to descriptive statistics, multivariate analysis of variance (MANOVA) and follow-up analyses were performed to explore any statistically significant mean differences among levels of health literacy and sociodemographic factors.
RESULTS: The levels of health literacy on the nine HLQ scales were lower than the levels reported in the literature. Multivariate analysis showed a significant effect of age, gender, smoking status, year of study, and field of study on the level of health literacy. Follow-up analyses revealed that female students, students from the health-related faculties, and those who do not smoke have higher levels of health literacy compared to their counterparts. A detailed comparison between the levels of the HLQ scales was made based on students' demographic characteristics. The field of study had the most prominent effect on the level of college students' health literacy; mean differences were statistically significant (p < .001), and effect sizes were large (ranging from .66 to 1.35 for the nine scales of the HLQ).
CONCLUSION: College students' health literacy is influenced by demographic characteristics. Such variations could amplify some of the existing health disparities. The implications of the findings on health, health promotion, and interprofessional education are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2014 Dec 15;9(12):e115193 [PMID: 25506825]
  2. Nutr J. 2013 Dec 17;12:162 [PMID: 24344995]
  3. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 18;10(3):e0119607 [PMID: 25786030]
  4. South Med J. 2014 Feb;107(2):61-5 [PMID: 24926667]
  5. Nurse Educ Pract. 2019 Jan;34:31-35 [PMID: 30419541]
  6. Eur J Public Health. 2015 Dec;25(6):1053-8 [PMID: 25843827]
  7. Biomed Res Int. 2017;2017:8516843 [PMID: 29130048]
  8. J Allied Health. 2010 Fall;39 Suppl 1:196-7 [PMID: 21174039]
  9. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 2017 Mar;139(3):804-809 [PMID: 27555454]
  10. J Am Coll Health. 2017 Aug-Sep;65(6):423-431 [PMID: 28617106]
  11. J Am Coll Health. 2007 May-Jun;55(6):376-9 [PMID: 17615666]
  12. J Am Coll Health. 2010 Mar-Apr;58(5):491-8 [PMID: 20304761]
  13. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2015 Apr 01;12:45 [PMID: 25890337]
  14. Am J Health Promot. 2014 May-Jun;28(5):298-305 [PMID: 23941106]
  15. BMC Public Health. 2018 Dec 29;18(1):1414 [PMID: 30594180]
  16. Scand J Public Health. 2017 Dec;45(8):831-838 [PMID: 29052485]
  17. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 04;11(3):e0151079 [PMID: 26943925]
  18. Evid Rep Technol Assess (Full Rep). 2011 Mar;(199):1-941 [PMID: 23126607]
  19. J Am Coll Health. 2020 Apr;68(3):242-249 [PMID: 30457454]
  20. BMC Public Health. 2015 Jul 21;15:678 [PMID: 26194350]
  21. J Diabetes Complications. 2018 Apr;32(4):368-372 [PMID: 29198996]
  22. BMC Public Health. 2013 Jul 16;13:658 [PMID: 23855504]
  23. BMC Public Health. 2012 Jan 25;12:80 [PMID: 22276600]
  24. J Am Coll Health. 2011;59(4):313-21 [PMID: 21308592]

Grants

  1. 82/2018/Jordan University of Science and Technology

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Cross-Sectional Studies
Female
Health Literacy
Humans
Male
Students
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States
Universities
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthliteracystudystudentsHealthcollegeHLQlevelsamongnineagefieldsignificantscaleseffectstudents'disparitiesconceptexploresociodemographicfactorsgenderyearsmokingstatuson-campususing5%questionnaireanalysisanalysesstatisticallymeandifferencesleveldemographiccharacteristicsCollegeBACKGROUND:multidimensionalconsideredprimarypublicconcernoftenneglectedresearchevidenceregardinglimitedaimtwo-fold:determineneedslimitationsrelationshipsdimensionsincludingnationalityhistorychronicdiseasesusegymintentionexerciseMETHODS:conductedcross-sectionalapproachtotal520participatedaverage2103 yearsSD = 22947males52femalesDatacollecteddemographicsLiteracyQuestionnaireadditiondescriptivestatisticsmultivariatevarianceMANOVAfollow-upperformedRESULTS:lowerreportedliteratureMultivariateshowedFollow-uprevealedfemalehealth-relatedfacultiessmokehighercomparedcounterpartsdetailedcomparisonmadebasedprominentp <001sizeslargeranging66135CONCLUSION:influencedvariationsamplifyexistingimplicationsfindingspromotioninterprofessionaleducationdiscussedliteracy:exploring

Similar Articles

Cited By (57)