Early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy for lower gastrointestinal neoplasms with peritoneal metastasis: a systematic review and critical analysis.

Mikael L Soucisse, Winston Liauw, Gabrielle Hicks, David L Morris
Author Information
  1. Mikael L Soucisse: Department of Surgery, University of New South Wales, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia. ORCID
  2. Winston Liauw: Department of Medical Oncology, University of New South Wales, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.
  3. Gabrielle Hicks: Department of Surgery, University of New South Wales, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.
  4. David L Morris: Department of Surgery, University of New South Wales, St George Hospital, Kogarah, New South Wales, Australia.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Early postoperative intraperitoneal chemotherapy (EPIC) can be used in combination with cytoreductive surgery (CRS) and hyperthermic intraperitoneal chemotherapy (HIPEC) to treat patients with peritoneal carcinomatosis (PC) of multiple origins. The present study is a systematic review to evaluate the role of EPIC after CRS + HIPEC for appendiceal and colorectal cancers with PC.
CONTENT: We conducted a systematic search in PubMed according to the PRISMA guidelines and included all studies published before June 27 of 2019 comparing EPIC to HIPEC or the combination of both. Our search found 79 articles. After excluding non-relevant articles, a total of 13 retrospective clinical studies reporting on the efficacy and safety of EPIC compared to HIPEC or as a combination therapy for lower gastrointestinal neoplasms were analyzed. Initial EPIC reports led to its declined usage because of concerns with increased postoperative morbidity and uncertain added benefit on survival. Recent retrospective studies have been promising, showing significant improvements in OS and fewer issues with complications when adding EPIC to CRS + HIPEC.
CONCLUSIONS: Current evidence is entirely retrospective and is conflicting. It is hoped that ongoing clinical trials and additional studies will clarify EPIC's role in the treatment of patients with PC.

Keywords

References

  1. J Clin Oncol. 2010 Jan 1;28(1):63-8 [PMID: 19917863]
  2. Int Surg. 2015 Jan;100(1):21-8 [PMID: 25594636]
  3. Am J Surg. 2019 Apr;217(4):704-712 [PMID: 30704669]
  4. Nature. 2019 Mar;567(7748):305-307 [PMID: 30894741]
  5. Ann Surg Oncol. 1997 Mar;4(2):141-8 [PMID: 9084851]
  6. Int J Qual Stud Health Well-being. 2018 Dec;13(1):1548240 [PMID: 30704375]
  7. Gastroenterol Res Pract. 2012;2012:378064 [PMID: 22778722]
  8. J Surg Oncol. 2017 Aug;116(2):236-243 [PMID: 28409831]
  9. J Clin Oncol. 2004 Aug 15;22(16):3284-92 [PMID: 15310771]
  10. J Am Coll Surg. 2018 Apr;226(4):434-443 [PMID: 29331663]
  11. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Jul;23(7):2266-73 [PMID: 26951148]
  12. J Clin Oncol. 2003 Oct 15;21(20):3737-43 [PMID: 14551293]
  13. J Clin Oncol. 2012 Jul 10;30(20):2449-56 [PMID: 22614976]
  14. J Surg Oncol. 2013 May;107(6):591-6 [PMID: 23129533]
  15. Ann Surg Oncol. 2012 Jul;19 Suppl 3:S475-82 [PMID: 21837528]
  16. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Dec;43(12):2292-2298 [PMID: 29017824]
  17. Semin Oncol. 1989 Aug;16(4 Suppl 6):83-97 [PMID: 2669141]
  18. Aust N Z J Surg. 1992 Sep;62(9):691-6 [PMID: 1520150]
  19. Bull Cancer. 2018 Apr;105(4):397-407 [PMID: 29486921]
  20. Dis Colon Rectum. 2014 Jul;57(7):858-68 [PMID: 24901687]
  21. Ann Surg Oncol. 2008 Sep;15(9):2426-32 [PMID: 18521686]
  22. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2012 Oct;38(10):969-76 [PMID: 22763244]
  23. Ann Surg. 2011 Aug;254(2):294-301 [PMID: 21772129]
  24. Eur J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jul;43(7):1228-1235 [PMID: 28189456]
  25. World J Surg. 2010 Jan;34(1):70-8 [PMID: 19760317]
  26. Int J Hyperthermia. 2016 May;32(3):281-8 [PMID: 26862667]
  27. Ann Surg Oncol. 2016 Dec;23(13):4231-4237 [PMID: 27338748]
  28. Ann Surg Oncol. 2010 Jul;17(7):1957-63 [PMID: 20143265]
  29. Ann Surg. 2013 Jun;257(6):1065-71 [PMID: 23299520]
  30. Cancer. 1977 Jun;39(6):2637-46 [PMID: 872062]
  31. Int J Clin Oncol. 2013 Jun;18(3):439-46 [PMID: 22415741]
  32. Ann Oncol. 2012 Mar;23(3):647-52 [PMID: 21685413]
  33. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 2001 Mar;47(3):269-76 [PMID: 11320672]
  34. Cancer Res. 1990 Sep 15;50(18):5790-4 [PMID: 2118420]
  35. Ann Surg Oncol. 2017 Jan;24(1):176-183 [PMID: 27718032]
  36. Ann Surg Oncol. 2007 Feb;14(2):509-14 [PMID: 17096054]
  37. Surg Oncol Clin N Am. 2012 Oct;21(4):665-88 [PMID: 23021723]
  38. Am J Surg. 2015 Sep;210(3):424-30 [PMID: 26051744]
  39. World J Surg. 2001 Aug;25(8):985-90 [PMID: 11571980]
  40. Cancer J. 2009 May-Jun;15(3):216-24 [PMID: 19556908]
  41. Br J Surg. 1989 Oct;76(10):1082-90 [PMID: 2688796]
  42. N Engl J Med. 2006 Jan 5;354(1):34-43 [PMID: 16394300]
  43. Can J Surg. 2009 Apr;52(2):135-41 [PMID: 19399209]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0EPICHIPECstudiespostoperativeintraperitonealchemotherapycombinationperitonealPCsystematicretrospectiveEarlypatientscarcinomatosisreviewroleCRS + HIPECappendicealsearcharticlesclinicallowergastrointestinalneoplasmscancerBACKGROUND:canusedcytoreductivesurgeryCRShyperthermictreatmultipleoriginspresentstudyevaluatecolorectalcancersCONTENT:conductedPubMedaccordingPRISMAguidelinesincludedpublishedJune272019comparingfound79excludingnon-relevanttotal13reportingefficacysafetycomparedtherapyanalyzedInitialreportsleddeclinedusageconcernsincreasedmorbidityuncertainaddedbenefitsurvivalRecentpromisingshowingsignificantimprovementsOSfewerissuescomplicationsaddingCONCLUSIONS:CurrentevidenceentirelyconflictinghopedongoingtrialsadditionalwillclarifyEPIC'streatmentmetastasis:criticalanalysiscolonperitonectomy

Similar Articles

Cited By