Dimensionally Enhanced Antibacterial Library Screening.

Navid J Ayon, William G Gutheil
Author Information
  1. Navid J Ayon: Division of Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy , University of Missouri-Kansas City , 2464 Charlotte Street , Kansas City , Missouri 64108 , United States. ORCID
  2. William G Gutheil: Division of Pharmacology and Pharmaceutical Sciences, School of Pharmacy , University of Missouri-Kansas City , 2464 Charlotte Street , Kansas City , Missouri 64108 , United States. ORCID

Abstract

The emergence and spread of antimicrobial resistance is a major public health threat, and there is an urgent need to develop new strategies to address the issue. In this study, the possibility of enhancing a whole cell based antibacterial library screen by increasing the dimensionality of the screening effort is explored using methicillin-resistant (MRSA) as the target organism. One dimension involved generating and screening a human liver microsome metabolized FDA approved drug library. Comparative screening of the un-metabolized (UM) and pre-metabolized (PM) libraries allows identification of intrinsically active agents from the UM library screen and of agents with active metabolites from the PM library screen. To further enhance this screening effort, it was combined with a -/+ resistant to antibiotic screen (-/+ cefoxitin; Cef). This allows the identification of agents that can act synergistically with the resistant to antibiotic. This approach revealed five compounds with substantially improved activity after metabolism and four compounds with substantial synergistic activity with cefoxitin. Capecitabine in particular only had significant antibacterial activity after metabolism. Its metabolites were isolated, identified, and characterized for spectrum of activity along with several other anticancer drugs with anti-MRSA activity. Floxuridine, gemcitabine, novobiocin, and rifaximin were identified as having substantial synergy with cefoxitin from the -/+Cef screens. Checkerboard assays verified synergy for these agents. Floxuridine demonstrated a particularly high degree of synergy with cefoxitin (FIC = 0.14). This study demonstrates how a dimensionally enhanced comparative screening effort can identify new antibacterial agents and strategies for countering antibacterial agent resistance.

References

  1. J Med Chem. 1998 Jul 30;41(16):2939-45 [PMID: 9685233]
  2. Drug Metab Dispos. 2011 Aug;39(8):1370-87 [PMID: 21525169]
  3. Rev Infect Dis. 1986 Nov-Dec;8 Suppl 5:S528-34 [PMID: 3026001]
  4. Biomed Res Int. 2016;2016:2475067 [PMID: 27274985]
  5. Clin Microbiol Rev. 2011 Jan;24(1):71-109 [PMID: 21233508]
  6. J Biomol Screen. 1999;4(2):67-73 [PMID: 10838414]
  7. Pharmacol Rev. 2013 Feb 13;65(2):578-640 [PMID: 23406671]
  8. PLoS One. 2014 Feb 19;9(2):e89189 [PMID: 24586584]
  9. Sci Rep. 2018 Feb 6;8(1):2521 [PMID: 29410445]
  10. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2007 Jan;6(1):29-40 [PMID: 17159923]
  11. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2007 Aug;51(8):2726-32 [PMID: 17526755]
  12. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2003 Jul;52(1):1 [PMID: 12805255]
  13. Sensors (Basel). 2012;12(9):12347-60 [PMID: 23112716]
  14. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 2017 Jan;70(1):3-24 [PMID: 27353164]
  15. Antimicrob Resist Infect Control. 2019 Aug 13;8:137 [PMID: 31417673]
  16. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2019 Jan;18(1):41-58 [PMID: 30310233]
  17. PLoS One. 2016 Dec 29;11(12):e0169090 [PMID: 28033417]
  18. J Antibiot (Tokyo). 1982 Feb;35(2):176-83 [PMID: 6951826]
  19. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Jan 1;68(1):22-28 [PMID: 29762662]
  20. Cancer Res. 1998 Feb 15;58(4):685-90 [PMID: 9485021]
  21. J Antimicrob Chemother. 2017 Aug 1;72(8):2156-2170 [PMID: 28575223]
  22. Curr Pharm Des. 2017;23(14):2147-2157 [PMID: 28190396]
  23. Nature. 2016 Jan 21;529(7586):336-43 [PMID: 26791724]
  24. J Clin Microbiol. 1996 Nov;34(11):2654-9 [PMID: 8897159]
  25. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2019 Apr;17(4):203-218 [PMID: 30737488]
  26. Pathogens. 2017 Sep 20;6(3): [PMID: 28930155]
  27. P T. 2015 Apr;40(4):277-83 [PMID: 25859123]
  28. Nat Rev Drug Discov. 2015 Aug;14(8):529-42 [PMID: 26139286]
  29. Int J Antimicrob Agents. 2012 May;39(5):444-7 [PMID: 22445492]
  30. Appl Biochem Biotechnol. 2010 Mar;160(6):1699-722 [PMID: 19582595]
  31. Chemotherapy. 2002 Sep;48(4):182-8 [PMID: 12218265]
  32. J Infect Dis. 2008 Apr 15;197(8):1079-81 [PMID: 18419525]
  33. Eur J Med Chem. 2015 Mar 26;93:33-41 [PMID: 25644674]
  34. Yakugaku Zasshi. 2010 Oct;130(10):1325-37 [PMID: 20930485]
  35. Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 2016 Sep 23;60(10):5663-72 [PMID: 27401577]
  36. Microbiol Immunol. 2010 May;54(5):265-75 [PMID: 20536723]

Grants

  1. R15 GM126502/NIGMS NIH HHS
  2. R21 AI121903/NIAID NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Anti-Bacterial Agents
Humans
Methicillin-Resistant Staphylococcus aureus
Microbial Sensitivity Tests
Microsomes, Liver

Chemicals

Anti-Bacterial Agents

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0screeningagentsactivityantibacteriallibraryscreencefoxitineffortsynergyresistancenewstrategiesstudyUMPMallowsidentificationactivemetabolites-/+resistantantibioticcancompoundsmetabolismsubstantialidentifiedFloxuridineemergencespreadantimicrobialmajorpublichealththreaturgentneeddevelopaddressissuepossibilityenhancingwholecellbasedincreasingdimensionalityexploredusingmethicillin-resistantMRSAtargetorganismOnedimensioninvolvedgeneratinghumanlivermicrosomemetabolizedFDAapproveddrugComparativeun-metabolizedpre-metabolizedlibrariesintrinsicallyenhancecombinedCefactsynergisticallyapproachrevealedfivesubstantiallyimprovedfoursynergisticCapecitabineparticularsignificantisolatedcharacterizedspectrumalongseveralanticancerdrugsanti-MRSAgemcitabinenovobiocinrifaximin-/+CefscreensCheckerboardassaysverifieddemonstratedparticularlyhighdegreeFIC=014demonstratesdimensionallyenhancedcomparativeidentifycounteringagentDimensionallyEnhancedAntibacterialLibraryScreening

Similar Articles

Cited By