Evaluating the Influence of Intraverbal Topography in Conditional Discrimination Procedures.

Lyndsay A Fairchild, Daniel L Gadke, Kasee K Stratton, Emily S Mathis, Alexander B Clarke
Author Information
  1. Lyndsay A Fairchild: Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Foundations, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA.
  2. Daniel L Gadke: Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Foundations, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA. dgadke@colled.msstate.edu. ORCID
  3. Kasee K Stratton: Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Foundations, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA.
  4. Emily S Mathis: Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Foundations, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA.
  5. Alexander B Clarke: Department of Counseling, Educational Psychology, and Foundations, Mississippi State University, Mississippi State, MS, 39762, USA.

Abstract

Stimulus equivalence training has been relatively under represented in the research literature for training individuals with autism spectrum disorder (ASD) in early letter-sound correspondence. The primary purpose of the current study was to compare the effectiveness of two different topographies of intraverbals on the emergence of untrained relations between letters and their phonemic sounds for two elementary aged children with ASD. Given frequent difficulties answering WH-questions for children with ASD, assessment and training using questions or statements was compared using a test-train-test sequence. Relations that required auditory-visual match to sample tasks emerged for both participants; however, emergence of untrained intraverbal relations differed based on the topography of assessment and training used. Limitations and future directions are discussed.

Keywords

References

  1. J Autism Dev Disord. 2013 Apr;43(4):996-1004 [PMID: 22923037]
  2. J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Spring;44(1):109-19 [PMID: 21541138]
  3. J Appl Behav Anal. 2009 Fall;42(3):685-90 [PMID: 20190929]
  4. J Appl Behav Anal. 2011 Winter;44(4):909-13 [PMID: 22219539]
  5. Early Child Educ J. 2016 Feb 1;44(1):11-19 [PMID: 26839494]
  6. Anal Verbal Behav. 2011;27(1):23-43 [PMID: 22532753]
  7. Autism Res. 2012 Apr;5(2):109-23 [PMID: 22359403]
  8. J Speech Hear Res. 1971 Mar;14(1):5-13 [PMID: 5550631]

MeSH Term

Applied Behavior Analysis
Autism Spectrum Disorder
Child
Discrimination, Psychological
Female
Humans
Language
Male
Reward

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0trainingASDStimulusequivalencespectrumdisordertwoemergenceuntrainedrelationschildrenassessmentusingbehaviorrelativelyrepresentedresearchliteratureindividualsautismearlyletter-soundcorrespondenceprimarypurposecurrentstudycompareeffectivenessdifferenttopographiesintraverbalslettersphonemicsoundselementaryagedGivenfrequentdifficultiesansweringWH-questionsquestionsstatementscomparedtest-train-testsequenceRelationsrequiredauditory-visualmatchsampletasksemergedparticipantshoweverintraverbaldifferedbasedtopographyusedLimitationsfuturedirectionsdiscussedEvaluatingInfluenceIntraverbalTopographyConditionalDiscriminationProceduresAppliedanalysisAutismIntraverbalsVerbal

Similar Articles

Cited By