Provider advice on physical activity and nutrition in twin pregnancies: a cross-sectional electronic survey.

Kara M Whitaker, Meghan Baruth, Rebecca A Schlaff, Hailee Talbot, Christopher P Connolly, Jihong Liu, Sara Wilcox
Author Information
  1. Kara M Whitaker: Department of Health and Human Physiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA. kara-whitaker@uiowa.edu. ORCID
  2. Meghan Baruth: Department of Health Sciences, Saginaw Valley State University, University Center, MI, USA.
  3. Rebecca A Schlaff: Department of Kinesiology, Saginaw Valley State University, University Center, MI, USA.
  4. Hailee Talbot: Department of Health and Human Physiology, University of Iowa, Iowa City, IA, USA.
  5. Christopher P Connolly: Department of Kinesiology and Educational Psychology, Washington State University, Pullman, WA, USA.
  6. Jihong Liu: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.
  7. Sara Wilcox: Department of Exercise Science, University of South Carolina, Columbia, SC, USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Health care providers should counsel pregnant patients on physical activity and nutrition to improve pregnancy outcomes. However, little is known about provider advice on these lifestyle behaviors among women pregnant with twins, a growing population at high risk for pregnancy complications. We examined the prevalence and content of provider advice on physical activity and nutrition among women pregnant with twins.
METHODS: A cross-sectional electronic survey was administered to 276 women who delivered twins in the past 3 years and received prenatal care in the United States. The proportion of women reporting provider advice on physical activity and nutrition during prenatal visits (yes/no) was assessed and open-ended questions examined the content of provider advice. Bivariate differences in participant characteristics, stratified by provider advice on physical activity and nutrition (yes/no), were assessed. Responses from open-ended questions were examined using a content analysis approach to identify commonly reported advice on physical activity and nutrition.
RESULTS: Approximately 75 and 63% of women reported provider advice on physical activity and nutrition, respectively, during their twin pregnancy. Women who recalled advice on physical activity most commonly reported recommendations to walk at a light to moderate intensity level. However, few women reported physical activity recommendations consistent with current guidelines, and approximately 55% of women reported provider advice to limit or restrict activity during their pregnancy, including bedrest. Nutrition advice was focused on eating a healthy, balanced diet and increasing protein intake. More women reported self-initiating the conversation on physical activity with their provider (40%) compared to nutrition (21%). Despite limited advice, 70% of women reported being satisfied or very satisfied with the information they received from their provider on physical activity or nutrition.
CONCLUSIONS: The majority of women reported provider advice on physical activity and nutrition during their twin pregnancies. However, advice was limited in detail, and physical activity levels were commonly restricted, despite the lack of evidence that activity restriction is beneficial during pregnancy. More research is needed to determine the optimal physical activity and dietary patterns in twin pregnancies to facilitate clear and consistent provider counseling on these lifestyle behaviors.

Keywords

References

  1. J Perinatol. 2015 Jun;35(6):405-10 [PMID: 25634520]
  2. N Engl J Med. 2013 Oct 10;369(15):1389-91 [PMID: 24106932]
  3. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2012 Jun;21(6):695-701 [PMID: 22111873]
  4. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2000 May;182(5):1089-92 [PMID: 10819836]
  5. Obstet Gynecol. 2015 Dec;126(6):e135-e142 [PMID: 26595585]
  6. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Mar 06;3:CD012031 [PMID: 28262917]
  7. Popul Health Metr. 2011 Oct 17;9(1):56 [PMID: 22004984]
  8. Am J Public Health. 2003 Apr;93(4):635-41 [PMID: 12660210]
  9. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2005 May;192(5):1440-2 [PMID: 15902131]
  10. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Oct;191(4):1077-83 [PMID: 15507924]
  11. Br J Sports Med. 2014 Feb;48(3):165-7 [PMID: 24311603]
  12. Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Jul;116(1):100-106 [PMID: 20567174]
  13. J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2008 Apr;30(4):317-326 [PMID: 18430381]
  14. Obstet Gynecol. 2005 Mar;105(3):633-8 [PMID: 15738036]
  15. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Feb;200(2):165.e1-6 [PMID: 19019329]
  16. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2014 Apr;27(6):552-6 [PMID: 23962105]
  17. Matern Child Health J. 2016 Nov;20(11):2309-2317 [PMID: 27400917]
  18. Med Sci Sports Exerc. 2003 Dec;35(12):2112-8 [PMID: 14652510]
  19. Hum Reprod. 2000 Aug;15(8):1856-64 [PMID: 10920117]
  20. Matern Child Health J. 2018 Aug;22(8):1127-1134 [PMID: 29450794]
  21. Sci Rep. 2018 Aug 21;8(1):12496 [PMID: 30131497]
  22. Acad Med. 2010 Sep;85(9):1537-42 [PMID: 20736683]
  23. Image J Nurs Sch. 1991 Fall;23(3):187-92 [PMID: 1916862]
  24. Health Care Women Int. 2001 Jan-Feb;22(1-2):29-47 [PMID: 11813795]
  25. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 2004 Mar;47(1):146-62 [PMID: 15024282]
  26. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth. 2017 Sep 29;17(1):330 [PMID: 28962593]
  27. Am J Perinatol. 2012 Jun;29(6):435-40 [PMID: 22399219]
  28. Health Care Women Int. 1992 Jul-Sep;13(3):313-21 [PMID: 1399871]
  29. Nurs Res. 1993 Jul-Aug;42(4):197-203 [PMID: 8337156]
  30. Womens Health Issues. 2016 May-Jun;26(3):321-8 [PMID: 26922386]
  31. J Nutr. 2004 Jul;134(7):1820-6 [PMID: 15226475]
  32. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2010 Mar;202(3):232.e1-5 [PMID: 19766979]
  33. Ethn Dis. 2013 Spring;23(2):129-35 [PMID: 23530291]
  34. Biol Res Nurs. 2004 Jan;5(3):177-86 [PMID: 14737918]
  35. Prev Med Rep. 2016 Jan 09;3:127-31 [PMID: 26844200]
  36. Phys Sportsmed. 2015 Nov;43(4):388-94 [PMID: 26365470]
  37. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2015 Dec;64(12):1-64 [PMID: 26727629]
  38. Natl Vital Stat Rep. 2018 Jan;67(1):1-55 [PMID: 29775434]
  39. Gynecol Obstet Invest. 2005;60(3):145-8 [PMID: 15925892]
  40. Obstet Gynecol. 2009 Nov;114(5):1121-1134 [PMID: 20168116]

MeSH Term

Adult
Counseling
Cross-Sectional Studies
Exercise
Female
Humans
Pregnancy
Pregnancy, Twin
Prenatal Care
Prenatal Nutritional Physiological Phenomena
Surveys and Questionnaires
United States

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0activityphysicaladviceprovidernutritionwomenreportedpregnancytwincarepregnantHowevertwinsexaminedcontentcommonlyHealthlifestylebehaviorsamongcross-sectionalelectronicsurveyreceivedprenatalyes/noassessedopen-endedquestionsrecommendationsconsistentNutritionlimitedsatisfiedpregnanciesBACKGROUND:providerscounselpatientsimproveoutcomeslittleknowngrowingpopulationhighriskcomplicationsprevalenceMETHODS:administered276deliveredpast3yearsUnitedStatesproportionreportingvisitsBivariatedifferencesparticipantcharacteristicsstratifiedResponsesusinganalysisapproachidentifyRESULTS:Approximately7563%respectivelyWomenrecalledwalklightmoderateintensitylevelcurrentguidelinesapproximately55%limitrestrictincludingbedrestfocusedeatinghealthybalanceddietincreasingproteinintakeself-initiatingconversation40%compared21%Despite70%informationCONCLUSIONS:majoritydetaillevelsrestricteddespitelackevidencerestrictionbeneficialresearchneededdetermineoptimaldietarypatternsfacilitateclearcounselingProviderpregnancies:AdviceCommunicationCounselingPhysicalPregnancyTwins

Similar Articles

Cited By