A cross-sectional study exploring the relationship between burnout, absenteeism, and job performance among American nurses.

Liselotte N Dyrbye, Tait D Shanafelt, Pamela O Johnson, Le Ann Johnson, Daniel Satele, Colin P West
Author Information
  1. Liselotte N Dyrbye: 1Mayo Clinic Program on Physician Well-Being, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA. ORCID
  2. Tait D Shanafelt: 2Stanford School of Medicine, Stanford, CA USA.
  3. Pamela O Johnson: 3Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA.
  4. Le Ann Johnson: 3Department of Nursing, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA.
  5. Daniel Satele: 4Department of Health Sciences Research, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN USA.
  6. Colin P West: 1Mayo Clinic Program on Physician Well-Being, Mayo Clinic, 200 First Street SW, Rochester, MN 55905 USA.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Studies suggest a high prevalence of burnout among nurses. The aim of this study was to evaluate the relationship between burnout among nurses and absenteeism and work performance.
METHODS: A national sample of U.S. nurses was sent an anonymous, cross-sectional survey in 2016. The survey included items about demographics, fatigue, and validated instruments to measure burnout, absenteeism, and poor work performance in the last month.
RESULTS: Of the 3098 nurses who received the survey, 812 (26.2%) responded. The mean age was 52.3 years (SD 12.5), nearly all were women (94.5%) and most were married (61.9%) and had a child (75.2%). Participating nurses had a mean of 25.7 (SD 13.9) years of experience working as nurse and most held a baccalaureate (38.2%) or masters of science (37.1%) degree in nursing. A quarter worked in the inpatient setting (25.5%) and the average hours worked per week was 41.3 (SD 14.1). Overall, 35.3% had symptoms of burnout, 30.7% had symptoms of depression, 8.3% had been absent 1 or more days in the last month due to personal health, and 43.8% had poor work performance in the last month. Nurses who had burnout were more likely to have been absent 1 or more days in the last month (OR 1.85, 95% CI 1.25-2.72) and have poor work performance (referent: high performer; medium performer, OR 2.68,95% CI 1.82-3.99; poor performer, OR 5.01, 95% CI 3.09-8.14). After adjusting for age, sex, relationship and parental status, highest academic degree, practice setting, burnout, depression, and satisfaction with work-life integration, nurses who were more fatigued (for each point worsening, OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.10-1.37) were more likely to have had absenteeism while those who worked more hours (for each additional hour OR 0.98, 95% CI 0.96-1.00) were less likely to have had absenteeism. Factors independently associated with poor work performance included burnout (OR 2.15, 95% CI 1.43-3.24) and fatigue (for each point of worsening, OR 1.22, 95% CI 1.12-1.33).
CONCLUSIONS: These findings suggest burnout is prevalent among nurses and likely impacts work performance.

Keywords

References

  1. JAMA. 2009 Sep 23;302(12):1294-300 [PMID: 19773564]
  2. J Nurs Manag. 2009 Apr;17(3):312-30 [PMID: 19426368]
  3. Behav Med. 2005 Spring;31(1):18-27 [PMID: 16078523]
  4. Front Psychol. 2016 Jul 26;7:1082 [PMID: 27507952]
  5. JAMA. 2007 Sep 26;298(12):1401-11 [PMID: 17895456]
  6. Int Nurs Rev. 2017 Mar;64(1):91-98 [PMID: 27882573]
  7. Arch Gen Psychiatry. 2007 Oct;64(10):1180-8 [PMID: 17909130]
  8. J Occup Environ Med. 2017 Jun;59(6):e112-e118 [PMID: 28598938]
  9. Curationis. 2018 Nov 27;41(1):e1-e5 [PMID: 30551710]
  10. Am J Infect Control. 2012 Aug;40(6):486-90 [PMID: 22854376]
  11. J Affect Disord. 2015 Jul 15;180:14-20 [PMID: 25879720]
  12. J Clin Oncol. 1998 Nov;16(11):3662-73 [PMID: 9817289]
  13. J Intern Med. 2018 Jun;283(6):516-529 [PMID: 29505159]
  14. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Feb;50(2):195-201 [PMID: 22902135]
  15. Am J Nurs. 2012 Feb;112(2):30-8; quiz 48, 39 [PMID: 22261652]
  16. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Dec;90(12):1600-13 [PMID: 26653297]
  17. Proc R Soc Med. 1969 Oct;62(10):989-93 [PMID: 4899510]
  18. J Occup Environ Med. 2004 Jun;46(6 Suppl):S23-37 [PMID: 15194893]
  19. Intensive Crit Care Nurs. 2016 Jun;34:51-8 [PMID: 26961918]
  20. Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Oct;43:36-41 [PMID: 30220361]
  21. Crit Care Med. 2016 Jul;44(7):1414-21 [PMID: 27309157]
  22. J Nurs Manag. 2019 Jan;27(1):52-65 [PMID: 30238670]
  23. J Appl Gerontol. 2016 Jan;35(1):84-105 [PMID: 25098251]
  24. J Nurs Manag. 2019 Mar;27(2):278-285 [PMID: 30238541]
  25. J Occup Health Psychol. 2015 Jan;20(1):1-14 [PMID: 25181281]
  26. Int Emerg Nurs. 2018 Jul;39:46-54 [PMID: 29361420]
  27. Nurs Ethics. 2019 May;26(3):809-822 [PMID: 28814140]
  28. J Clin Oncol. 2006 Feb 1;24(4):635-42 [PMID: 16446335]
  29. Health Econ. 2008 Apr;17(4):469-85 [PMID: 17628862]
  30. JAMA. 1994 Dec 14;272(22):1749-56 [PMID: 7966923]
  31. J Occup Environ Med. 2003 Feb;45(2):156-74 [PMID: 12625231]
  32. BMJ. 2012 Mar 20;344:e1717 [PMID: 22434089]
  33. J Clin Oncol. 2012 May 1;30(13):1498-504 [PMID: 22454418]
  34. Int J Nurs Pract. 2017 Dec;23(6):null [PMID: 29094426]
  35. Med Decis Making. 2014 Jan;34(1):127-37 [PMID: 23913916]
  36. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2007 Dec;34(6):628-38 [PMID: 17703910]
  37. Policy Polit Nurs Pract. 2014 Aug-Nov;15(3-4):72-80 [PMID: 25121923]
  38. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2014 Dec 18;12:187 [PMID: 25519478]
  39. Health Care Manage Rev. 2018 Jan/Mar;43(1):21-29 [PMID: 27755174]
  40. Front Psychol. 2015 Jan 22;5:1573 [PMID: 25657627]
  41. PLoS One. 2018 Apr 25;13(4):e0195039 [PMID: 29694375]
  42. Appl Nurs Res. 2018 Jun;41:68-72 [PMID: 29853218]
  43. Am J Crit Care. 2015 Sep;24(5):412-20 [PMID: 26330434]
  44. J Gen Intern Med. 1997 Jul;12(7):439-45 [PMID: 9229283]
  45. J Nurs Manag. 2019 Jan;27(1):143-153 [PMID: 30209880]
  46. Nurs Outlook. 2018 May - Jun;66(3):273-282 [PMID: 29685321]
  47. Arch Intern Med. 2012 Oct 8;172(18):1377-85 [PMID: 22911330]
  48. Int J Nurs Stud. 2012 Jul;49(7):887-905 [PMID: 22019402]
  49. J Nurs Manag. 2016 Apr;24(3):393-9 [PMID: 26347211]
  50. Nurs Res. 2018 Nov/Dec;67(6):447-455 [PMID: 30138124]
  51. Med Lav. 2012 Nov-Dec;103(6):466-81 [PMID: 23405481]
  52. Int J Nurs Stud. 2013 Feb;50(2):281-91 [PMID: 22831971]
  53. J Behav Med. 1995 Dec;18(6):581-99 [PMID: 8749987]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.01burnoutnursesperformanceOR95%CIworkabsenteeismpooramonglastmonthlikelyrelationshipsurvey2%SDworkedperformersuggesthighstudycross-sectionalincludedfatiguemeanage55%2537degreesettinghours3143%symptomsdepressionabsentdaysNurses2pointworsening220BACKGROUND:StudiesprevalenceaimevaluateMETHODS:nationalsampleUSsentanonymous2016itemsdemographicsvalidatedinstrumentsmeasureRESULTS:3098received81226responded523 years12nearlywomen94married619%child75Participating7139yearsexperienceworkingnurseheldbaccalaureate38mastersscience1%nursingquarterinpatientaverageperweek41Overall35307%8duepersonalhealth438%8525-272referent:medium6882-3990109-8adjustingsexparentalstatushighestacademicpracticesatisfactionwork-lifeintegrationfatigued10-1additionalhour9896-100lessFactorsindependentlyassociated1543-32412-133CONCLUSIONS:findingsprevalentimpactsexploringjobAmericanAbsenteeismBurnoutpsychologicalJobPresenteeism

Similar Articles

Cited By