Design Thinking to Improve Implementation of Public Health Interventions: An Exploratory Case Study on Enhancing Park Use.

Terry T-K Huang, Jonathan Aitken, Emily Ferris, Nevin Cohen
Author Information
  1. Terry T-K Huang: Center for Systems and Community Design, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, United States of America.
  2. Jonathan Aitken: Tacit Design Strategy, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
  3. Emily Ferris: Center for Systems and Community Design, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, United States of America.
  4. Nevin Cohen: Center for Systems and Community Design, Graduate School of Public Health and Health Policy, City University of New York, New York, United States of America.

Abstract

Design thinking, a human-centred, iterative process to innovate solutions aligned with communities' tacit knowledge, has the potential to augment public health interventions. This paper presents a case study of a design thinking workshop to illustrate the process and methods to train public health researchers. A workshop was conducted to engage participants in a systematic, non-linear process of design thinking to design possible interventions to enhance use of renovated New York City parks. Participants engaged in exercises to rapidly craft proposals for park re-design. The process involved learning about design methods to overcome limitations of linear thinking and how design thinking can be applied to public health problems that require community input. The case study demonstrated the feasibility of training public health researchers in design thinking methods that can be applied to public health problems. With increased capacity, public health researchers could apply design thinking to community collaborations to develop solutions embedded in the unique contexts of the community.

Keywords

References

  1. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Dec 16;18(12):e317 [PMID: 27986647]
  2. Lancet. 2011 Aug 27;378(9793):838-47 [PMID: 21872752]
  3. Am J Prev Med. 2009 Dec;37(6):475-80 [PMID: 19944911]
  4. BMC Public Health. 2016 Nov 14;16(1):1160 [PMID: 27842531]
  5. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2016 Aug 08;13:90 [PMID: 27501724]
  6. Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:235-51 [PMID: 23297655]
  7. Prev Chronic Dis. 2018 Sep 27;15:E117 [PMID: 30264690]
  8. Arch Intern Med. 2011 Jul 11;171(13):1162-70 [PMID: 21747011]
  9. J Digit Imaging. 2017 Jun;30(3):267-274 [PMID: 28070707]
  10. Lancet. 2011 Aug 27;378(9793):804-14 [PMID: 21872749]
  11. Matern Child Health J. 2015 Dec;19(12):2552-9 [PMID: 26197732]
  12. Int J Behav Nutr Phys Act. 2012 Dec 20;9:151 [PMID: 23256730]
  13. Prev Chronic Dis. 2009 Jul;6(3):A110 [PMID: 19527582]
  14. Implement Sci. 2012 Mar 20;7:20 [PMID: 22433980]

Grants

  1. R01 CA206877/NCI NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0thinkingdesignpublichealthprocessDesignmethodsresearcherscommunitysolutionsinterventionscasestudyworkshopparkscanappliedproblemshuman-centrediterativeinnovatealignedcommunities'tacitknowledgepotentialaugmentpaperpresentsillustratetrainconductedengageparticipantssystematicnon-linearpossibleenhanceuserenovatedNewYorkCityParticipantsengagedexercisesrapidlycraftproposalsparkre-designinvolvedlearningovercomelimitationslinearrequireinputdemonstratedfeasibilitytrainingincreasedcapacityapplycollaborationsdevelopembeddeduniquecontextsThinkingImproveImplementationPublicHealthInterventions:ExploratoryCaseStudyEnhancingParkUseimplementationscience

Similar Articles

Cited By