Medically Unexplained Symptoms and Attachment Theory: The BodyMind Approach®.

Helen Payne, Susan D Brooks
Author Information
  1. Helen Payne: School of Education, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.
  2. Susan D Brooks: School of Education, University of Hertfordshire, Hertfordshire, United Kingdom.

Abstract

This article discusses how The BodyMind Approach (TBMA) addresses insecure attachment styles in medically unexplained symptoms (MUS). Insecure attachment styles are associated with adverse childhood experiences (ACEs) and MUS (Adshead and Guthrie, 2015) and affect sufferers' capacity to self-manage. The article goes on to make a new hypothesis to account for TBMA's effectiveness (Payne and Brooks, 2017), that is, it addresses insecure attachment styles, which may be present in some MUS sufferers, leading to their capacity to self-manage. Three insecure attachment styles (dismissive, pre-occupied and fearful) associated with MUS are discussed. TBMA is described and explanations provided of how TBMA has been specifically designed to support people's insecure attachment styles. Three key concepts to support insecure attachment styles involved in the content of TBMA are identified and debated: (a) emotional regulation; (b) safety; and (c) bodymindfulness. There is a rationale for the design of TBMA as opposed to psychological interventions for this population. The programme's structure, facilitation and content, takes account of the three insecure attachment styles above. Examples of how TBMA works with their specific characteristics are presented. TBMA has been tested and found to be effective during delivery in the United Kingdom National Health Service (NHS). Improved self-management has potential to reduce costs for the NHS and in General Practitioner time and resources.

Keywords

References

  1. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Dec;1008:31-47 [PMID: 14998870]
  2. Am J Med. 1989 Mar;86(3):262-6 [PMID: 2919607]
  3. BMC Fam Pract. 2007 May 31;8:33 [PMID: 17540013]
  4. Psychol Med. 2011 Jun;41(6):1133-42 [PMID: 20843407]
  5. Psychosom Med. 2002 Jul-Aug;64(4):660-7 [PMID: 12140356]
  6. BMC Fam Pract. 2014 Jun 05;15:109 [PMID: 24903850]
  7. Psychol Med. 2011 Mar;41(3):555-63 [PMID: 21272387]
  8. J Clin Psychiatry. 1998;59 Suppl 20:15-21 [PMID: 9881537]
  9. Psychosom Med. 2006 Jan-Feb;68(1):129-35 [PMID: 16449423]
  10. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2014 Jun;48(6):542-7 [PMID: 24270311]
  11. Child Abuse Negl. 2003 Nov;27(11):1247-58 [PMID: 14637300]
  12. JAMA. 1995 Dec 27;274(24):1931-4 [PMID: 8568987]
  13. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e42629 [PMID: 22880056]
  14. Fam Pract. 2006 Aug;23(4):414-20 [PMID: 16632487]
  15. J Psychosom Res. 2004 Dec;57(6):517-20 [PMID: 15596157]
  16. Ment Health Fam Med. 2010 Dec;7(4):209-21 [PMID: 22477945]
  17. Children (Basel). 2017 Nov 15;4(11):null [PMID: 29140276]
  18. Scand J Prim Health Care. 2013 Jun;31(2):95-100 [PMID: 23659708]
  19. Front Psychol. 2018 Nov 13;9:2222 [PMID: 30483203]
  20. Health Serv J. 2014 Mar 14;124(6390):26-7 [PMID: 24933838]
  21. Biopsychosoc Med. 2014 Jan 03;8(1):1 [PMID: 24383884]
  22. Psychosomatics. 2011 May-Jun;52(3):263-71 [PMID: 21565598]
  23. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2010 Apr;78(2):169-83 [PMID: 20350028]
  24. Arch Intern Med. 1986 Jan;146(1):69-72 [PMID: 3942467]
  25. Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Jun 17;15(1):56 [PMID: 28623933]
  26. Violence Vict. 2001 Feb;16(1):39-47 [PMID: 11281223]
  27. Br J Psychiatry. 2012 Jun;200(6):499-507 [PMID: 22539780]
  28. Child Abuse Negl. 2014 Feb;38(2):224-33 [PMID: 24670331]
  29. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Jul;77(1):94-110 [PMID: 10434410]
  30. BMJ. 2002 Nov 9;325(7372):1082 [PMID: 12424170]
  31. Gen Hosp Psychiatry. 2008 May-Jun;30(3):191-9 [PMID: 18433651]
  32. J Psychosom Res. 2004 Jul;57(1):35-43 [PMID: 15256293]
  33. Can J Psychiatry. 1995 Jun;40(5):234-40 [PMID: 7553541]
  34. Psychosomatics. 1999 Jan-Feb;40(1):34-43 [PMID: 9989119]
  35. J Am Psychoanal Assoc. 2000;48(4):1055-96; discussion 1175-87 [PMID: 11212183]
  36. Am J Orthopsychiatry. 2012 Jan;82(1):137-45 [PMID: 22239404]
  37. Cortex. 2018 Jul;104:241-260 [PMID: 28826604]
  38. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1991 Aug;61(2):226-44 [PMID: 1920064]
  39. J Nerv Ment Dis. 2004 Mar;192(3):200-9 [PMID: 15091301]
  40. Psychosom Med. 2003 Mar-Apr;65(2):292-300 [PMID: 12651997]
  41. J Psychosom Res. 2014 Jul;77(1):27-33 [PMID: 24913338]
  42. CJEM. 2009 Nov;11(6):529-34 [PMID: 19922712]
  43. Psychol Med. 2000 Jul;30(4):931-41 [PMID: 11037101]
  44. J Psychosom Res. 2011 Nov;71(5):325-34 [PMID: 21999976]
  45. Lancet. 2007 Mar 17;369(9565):946-55 [PMID: 17368156]
  46. Psychiatr Clin North Am. 2010 Sep;33(3):579-93 [PMID: 20599134]
  47. Psychol Med. 2012 Apr;42(4):855-64 [PMID: 21880165]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0attachmentTBMAinsecurestylesMUSarticleBodyMindaddressesmedicallyunexplainedsymptomsassociatedcapacityself-manageaccountThreesupportcontentsafetybodymindfulnessNHSdiscussesApproachInsecureadversechildhoodexperiencesACEsAdsheadGuthrie2015affectsufferers'goesmakenewhypothesisTBMA'seffectivenessPayneBrooks2017maypresentsufferersleadingdismissivepre-occupiedfearfuldiscusseddescribedexplanationsprovidedspecificallydesignedpeople'skeyconceptsinvolvedidentifieddebated:emotionalregulationbcrationaledesignopposedpsychologicalinterventionspopulationprogramme'sstructurefacilitationtakesthreeExamplesworksspecificcharacteristicspresentedtestedfoundeffectivedeliveryUnitedKingdomNationalHealthServiceImprovedself-managementpotentialreducecostsGeneralPractitionertimeresourcesMedicallyUnexplainedSymptomsAttachmentTheory:Approach®facilitatorgroupstyleselfmanagementinterventionbodymindapproach

Similar Articles

Cited By