Face recognition and memory in congenital amusia.

Weidong Tao, Huayan Huang, Hanna Haponenko, Hong-Jin Sun
Author Information
  1. Weidong Tao: Department of Psychology, School of Teacher Education, Huzhou Normal University, Huzhou, Zhejiang, China. ORCID
  2. Huayan Huang: Department of Psychology, School of Education, Lingnan Normal University, Zhanjiang, Guangdong, China.
  3. Hanna Haponenko: Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamiliton, Ontario, Canada. ORCID
  4. Hong-Jin Sun: Department of Psychology, Neuroscience and Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamiliton, Ontario, Canada.

Abstract

Congenital amusia, commonly known as tone deafness, is a lifelong impairment of music perception and production. It remains a question of debate whether the impairments in musical domain observed in Congenital amusia are paralleled in other non-musical perceptual abilities. Using behavioral measures in two experiments, the current study explored face perception and memory in congenital amusics. Both congenital amusics and matched controls performed a face perception task (Experiment 1) and an old/novel object memory task (for both faces and houses, Experiment 2). The results showed that the congenital amusic group had significantly slower reaction times than that in matched control group when identifying whether two faces presented together were the same or different. For different face-pairs, the deficit was greater for upright faces compared with inverted faces. For object memory task, the congenital amusic group also showed worse memory performance than the control group. The results of the present study suggest that the impairment attributed to Congenital amusia is not only limited to music, but also extends to visual perception and visual memory domain.

References

  1. Brain Cogn. 2009 Dec;71(3):259-64 [PMID: 19762140]
  2. Curr Biol. 2002 Jun 25;12(12):R420-1 [PMID: 12123591]
  3. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1169:270-2 [PMID: 19673791]
  4. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2018 May 9;:null [PMID: 29744897]
  5. Nat Neurosci. 2009 Sep;12(9):1187-96 [PMID: 19668199]
  6. Sci Rep. 2017 Mar 13;7:44285 [PMID: 28287166]
  7. Trends Cogn Sci. 2003 Aug;7(8):362-367 [PMID: 12907232]
  8. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1169:490-3 [PMID: 19673828]
  9. Brain. 2004 Apr;127(Pt 4):801-10 [PMID: 14985262]
  10. J Psychiatry Neurosci. 2014 Mar;39(2):118-26 [PMID: 24119791]
  11. Ann Hum Genet. 1980 May;43(4):369-82 [PMID: 7396411]
  12. Brain Cogn. 2004 Jul;55(2):247-9 [PMID: 15177788]
  13. Cortex. 2005 Feb;41(1):77-83 [PMID: 15633709]
  14. Schizophr Res. 2014 Aug;157(1-3):60-2 [PMID: 24957355]
  15. Neuron. 2002 Jan 17;33(2):185-91 [PMID: 11804567]
  16. Memory. 2010 Aug;18(6):657-69 [PMID: 20706954]
  17. Trends Cogn Sci. 2016 Nov;20(11):857-867 [PMID: 27692992]
  18. PLoS One. 2012;7(7):e41411 [PMID: 22859982]
  19. Nat Neurosci. 2007 Jul;10(7):915-21 [PMID: 17589505]
  20. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2006 Aug;32(4):1023-39 [PMID: 16846295]
  21. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1995 Aug 29;92(18):8135-9 [PMID: 7667258]
  22. Front Psychol. 2011 Jun 17;2:120 [PMID: 21734894]
  23. Cortex. 2015 Oct;71:171-82 [PMID: 26226563]
  24. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2003 Nov;999:58-75 [PMID: 14681118]
  25. Nature. 1996 Apr 11;380(6574):499-505 [PMID: 8606767]
  26. Brain Res. 2016 Jun 1;1640(Pt B):251-63 [PMID: 26505915]
  27. Trends Cogn Sci. 2007 Jan;11(1):8-15 [PMID: 17129746]
  28. Annu Rev Psychol. 2005;56:89-114 [PMID: 15709930]
  29. PLoS One. 2010 Apr 21;5(4):e10173 [PMID: 20422050]
  30. J Neurophysiol. 2016 Jul 1;116(1):88-97 [PMID: 27009161]
  31. Neuroimage. 1997 Aug;6(2):113-21 [PMID: 9299385]
  32. Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jul;48(9):2630-9 [PMID: 20471406]
  33. J Acoust Soc Am. 2007 Feb;121(2):1182-9 [PMID: 17348539]
  34. Curr Biol. 2014 Mar 17;24(6):699-704 [PMID: 24613311]
  35. Nat Neurosci. 2000 Feb;3(2):191-7 [PMID: 10649576]
  36. Trends Cogn Sci. 2002 Jun 1;6(6):255-260 [PMID: 12039607]
  37. Behav Res Methods. 2009 May;41(2):279-83 [PMID: 19363168]
  38. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Nov 13;109(46):19027-32 [PMID: 23112175]
  39. Brain Cogn. 2011 Jun;76(1):70-6 [PMID: 21440971]
  40. Cereb Cortex. 2011 Feb;21(2):292-9 [PMID: 20494966]
  41. Psychol Rev. 1998 Jul;105(3):482-98 [PMID: 9697428]
  42. Front Hum Neurosci. 2018 Oct 30;12:438 [PMID: 30425629]
  43. Brain. 1999 May;122 ( Pt 5):943-62 [PMID: 10355678]
  44. Psychol Sci. 2004 May;15(5):356-60 [PMID: 15102148]
  45. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Jun;930:273-80 [PMID: 11458834]
  46. Brain. 2002 Feb;125(Pt 2):238-51 [PMID: 11844725]
  47. Cogn Psychol. 1993 Jul;25(3):281-316 [PMID: 8354050]
  48. Brain. 1992 Feb;115 Pt 1:15-36 [PMID: 1559150]
  49. Cogn Neuropsychol. 2019 Feb - Mar;36(1-2):1-17 [PMID: 30785364]
  50. Curr Biol. 2009 Jul 14;19(13):1146-50 [PMID: 19481456]
  51. PLoS One. 2017 Jun 15;12(6):e0179252 [PMID: 28617864]
  52. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2001 Jun;930:1-16 [PMID: 11458822]
  53. PLoS One. 2013 Aug 15;8(8):e73372 [PMID: 23977386]
  54. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Apr;64(4):625-38 [PMID: 21409740]
  55. Hum Brain Mapp. 2013 Sep;34(9):2045-54 [PMID: 22431306]
  56. Brain. 2010 Jun;133(Pt 6):1682-93 [PMID: 20418275]
  57. Eur J Hum Genet. 2017 May;25(5):625-630 [PMID: 28224991]
  58. Neuropsychologia. 2019 Feb 18;124:87-97 [PMID: 30625291]
  59. Q J Exp Psychol A. 1993 May;46(2):225-45 [PMID: 8316637]
  60. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2009 Jul;1169:441-5 [PMID: 19673821]
  61. Curr Opin Neurobiol. 2008 Apr;18(2):127-30 [PMID: 18694826]
  62. Neuropsychologia. 2012 Feb;50(3):367-78 [PMID: 22201556]
  63. S Afr Med J. 1981 Jan 17;59(3):78-81 [PMID: 7008213]
  64. Brain. 2010 Sep;133(9):2635-42 [PMID: 20685803]

MeSH Term

Acoustic Stimulation
Auditory Perceptual Disorders
Behavior Observation Techniques
Case-Control Studies
Facial Recognition
Female
Humans
Male
Memory
Pitch Perception
Reaction Time
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0congenitalmemoryamusiaperceptionfacesgrouptaskimpairmentmusicwhetherdomaintwostudyfaceamusicsmatchedExperimentobjectresultsshowedamusiccontroldifferentalsovisualCongenitalcommonlyknowntonedeafnesslifelongproductionremainsquestiondebateimpairmentsmusicalobservedparallelednon-musicalperceptualabilitiesUsingbehavioralmeasuresexperimentscurrentexploredcontrolsperformed1old/novelhouses2significantlyslowerreactiontimesidentifyingpresentedtogetherface-pairsdeficitgreateruprightcomparedinvertedworseperformancepresentsuggestattributedlimitedextendsFacerecognition

Similar Articles

Cited By (3)