Endoscopic Nipple-Sparing Mastectomy with Immediate Prepectoral Implant-Based Reconstruction: A Case Report.

Gauthier Rathat, Christian Herlin, Christophe Bonnel, Guillaume Captier, Martha Duraes
Author Information
  1. Gauthier Rathat: Department of Oncological Breast Surgery, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
  2. Christian Herlin: Department of Plastic Surgery, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.
  3. Christophe Bonnel: Innovation Extractor Department, Montpellier Hospital, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
  4. Guillaume Captier: Laboratory of Anatomy, University of Montpellier, Montpellier, France.
  5. Martha Duraes: Department of Oncological Breast Surgery, Montpellier University Hospital, Montpellier, France.

Abstract

BACKGROUND Technical innovations allow endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy (NSM), which is well tolerated and associated with greater patient satisfaction. Endoscopic technique did not have wide diffusion; many centers have abandoned this technique because of technical challenges. Implant-based reconstruction (IBR) remains the most common form of breast reconstruction. Current techniques involve partial or total coverage of the implant with pectoralis major muscle to prevent exposure or infection. Muscle dissection has functional and cosmetic consequences. CASE REPORT We present a case of 45-year-old patient presenting with personal history of right breast cancer. The patient requested left prophylactic mastectomy. We used a 4 cm-long single hidden scar on axillary line. Endoscopic nipple-sparing mastectomy was done using a single port with 3 sleeves. Immediate breast reconstruction was performed by inserting a silicon implant in prepectoral plane without Acellular Dermal Matrix (ADM). At 6 months postoperatively, no complication had been reported. The patient was satisfied with the result and no further correction was necessary. CONCLUSIONS Endoscopic surgery is a valuable option for nipple-sparing mastectomy. This method is a less expensive alternative technique to robotic approach. It could enable safe prepectoral IBR without placement of ADM and with lower risk of complications.

References

  1. Surg Innov. 2015 Aug;22(4):382-9 [PMID: 25118202]
  2. Breast. 2018 Jun;39:8-13 [PMID: 29455110]
  3. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):51S-59S [PMID: 29064922]
  4. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2009 Jan;33(1):44-8 [PMID: 19052809]
  5. Surg Today. 2018 Jun;48(6):591-597 [PMID: 29468434]
  6. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2019 Feb 13;7(2):e2082 [PMID: 30881831]
  7. Breast. 2017 Feb;31:51-56 [PMID: 27810700]
  8. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2017 Sep 19;5(9):e1488 [PMID: 29062655]
  9. Ann Surg. 2017 Aug;266(2):e28-e30 [PMID: 28692558]
  10. Pract Radiat Oncol. 2018 May - Jun;8(3):153-156 [PMID: 29233522]
  11. Surgery. 2002 Jan;131(1 Suppl):S324-9 [PMID: 11821832]
  12. Ann Surg Oncol. 2018 Sep;25(9):2579-2586 [PMID: 29959612]
  13. JAMA Surg. 2018 Feb 1;153(2):123-129 [PMID: 28903167]
  14. J Laparoendosc Adv Surg Tech A. 2014 Feb;24(2):77-82 [PMID: 24401140]
  15. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Sep;140(3):432-443 [PMID: 28574950]
  16. Plast Reconstr Surg Glob Open. 2018 Jan 12;6(1):e1625 [PMID: 29464161]
  17. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2018 Sep;142(3):624-627 [PMID: 29879007]
  18. World J Surg Oncol. 2017 Jan 11;15(1):19 [PMID: 28077134]
  19. JSLS. 2017 Apr-Jun;21(2):null [PMID: 28684896]
  20. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2017 Nov;140(5S Advances in Breast Reconstruction):44S-50S [PMID: 29064921]
  21. Breast J. 2018 May;24(3):373-376 [PMID: 29251382]
  22. Ann Chir Plast Esthet. 2018 Jun;63(3):e6-e13 [PMID: 29030030]
  23. PLoS One. 2016 Mar 07;11(3):e0150310 [PMID: 26950469]
  24. Chin Med J (Engl). 2009 Dec 20;122(24):2945-50 [PMID: 20137479]
  25. Clin Breast Cancer. 2017 Dec;17(8):581-584 [PMID: 28428099]

MeSH Term

Breast Implants
Breast Neoplasms
Endoscopy
Female
Humans
Mammaplasty
Middle Aged
Nipples
Organ Sparing Treatments
Prophylactic Mastectomy