Diabetes digital app technology: benefits, challenges, and recommendations. A consensus report by the European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) Diabetes Technology Working Group.

G Alexander Fleming, John R Petrie, Richard M Bergenstal, Reinhard W Holl, Anne L Peters, Lutz Heinemann
Author Information
  1. G Alexander Fleming: Kinexum, PO Box 1260, Harpers Ferry, WV, 25425, USA. zanfleming@kinexum.com.
  2. John R Petrie: Institute of Cardiovascular and Medical Sciences, University of Glasgow, Glasgow, UK.
  3. Richard M Bergenstal: International Diabetes Center at Park Nicollet, Minneapolis, MN, USA.
  4. Reinhard W Holl: Institute of Epidemiology and Medical Biometry, ZIBMT, University of Ulm, Ulm, Germany.
  5. Anne L Peters: Keck School of Medicine of the University of Southern California, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  6. Lutz Heinemann: Science-Consulting in Diabetes GmbH, Neuss, Germany.

Abstract

Digital health technology, especially digital and health applications ('apps'), have been developing rapidly to help people manage their diabetes. Numerous health-related apps provided on smartphones and other wireless devices are available to support people with diabetes who need to adopt either lifestyle interventions or medication adjustments in response to glucose-monitoring data. However, regulations and guidelines have not caught up with the burgeoning field to standardise how mobile health apps are reviewed and monitored for patient safety and clinical validity. The available evidence on the safety and effectiveness of mobile health apps, especially for diabetes, remains limited. The European Association for the Study of Diabetes (EASD) and the American Diabetes Association (ADA) have therefore conducted a joint review of the current landscape of available diabetes digital health technology (only stand-alone diabetes apps, as opposed to those that are integral to a regulated medical device, such as insulin pumps, continuous glucose monitoring systems, and automated insulin delivery systems) and practices of regulatory authorities and organisations. We found that, across the USA and Europe, mobile apps intended to manage health and wellness are largely unregulated unless they meet the definition of medical devices for therapeutic and/or diagnostic purposes. International organisations, including the International Medical Device Regulators Forum and WHO, have made strides in classifying different types of digital health technology and integrating digital health technology into the field of medical devices. As the diabetes digital health field continues to develop and become more fully integrated into everyday life, we wish to ensure that it is based on the best evidence for safety and efficacy. As a result, we bring to light several issues that the diabetes community, including regulatory authorities, policymakers, professional organisations, researchers, people with diabetes and healthcare professionals, needs to address to ensure that diabetes health technology can meet its full potential. These issues range from inadequate evidence on app accuracy and clinical validity to lack of training provision, poor interoperability and standardisation, and insufficient data security. We conclude with a series of recommended actions to resolve some of these shortcomings.

Keywords

References

  1. Emerg (Tehran). 2015 Spring;3(2):48-9 [PMID: 26495380]
  2. BMC Med. 2018 Dec 3;16(1):225 [PMID: 30501638]
  3. JAMA. 2019 Apr 16;321(15):1530-1532 [PMID: 30990543]
  4. J Behav Med. 2016 Dec;39(6):981-994 [PMID: 27412774]
  5. Patient Educ Couns. 2012 Nov;89(2):360-1 [PMID: 22897983]
  6. Am J Prev Med. 2014 Jun;46(6):649-52 [PMID: 24842742]
  7. N Engl J Med. 2001 May 3;344(18):1343-50 [PMID: 11333990]
  8. Lancet. 2016 Apr 9;387(10027):1513-1530 [PMID: 27061677]
  9. JAMA. 2016 Sep 20;316(11):1153-4 [PMID: 27398696]
  10. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 Apr 16;9(5):1143-7 [PMID: 25883162]
  11. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2015 May;9(3):541-8 [PMID: 25901020]
  12. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2016 Feb;18 Suppl 1:S56-68 [PMID: 26836430]
  13. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2018 Sep;12(5):911-913 [PMID: 29719978]
  14. Pediatr Diabetes. 2018 Oct;19 Suppl 27:302-325 [PMID: 30039513]
  15. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Feb 03;16(2):e32 [PMID: 24491911]
  16. Eur J Endocrinol. 2015 Mar;172(3):R93-101 [PMID: 25227131]
  17. N Engl J Med. 2012 Mar 1;366(9):848-55 [PMID: 22332952]
  18. Diabetes Care. 2008 Jul;31(7):1305-10 [PMID: 18364392]
  19. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2013 May 1;20(3):513-8 [PMID: 23429637]
  20. J Biomed Inform. 2017 Jul;71:31-48 [PMID: 28536062]
  21. Endocrinol Metab Clin North Am. 2016 Dec;45(4):943-965 [PMID: 27823614]
  22. P T. 2014 May;39(5):356-64 [PMID: 24883008]
  23. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Jun 14;15(6):e120 [PMID: 23770578]
  24. Int J Pediatr Endocrinol. 2012 Oct 26;2012(1):28 [PMID: 23098076]
  25. Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Jul;33(7):697-702 [PMID: 26154006]
  26. BMJ. 2007 Feb 10;334(7588):299 [PMID: 17237299]
  27. Nat Biotechnol. 2016 Mar;34(3):239-46 [PMID: 26963544]
  28. J Med Internet Res. 2016 Oct 31;18(11):e287 [PMID: 27806926]
  29. JACC Basic Transl Sci. 2016 Aug 29;1(5):399-412 [PMID: 30167527]
  30. JAMA. 2016 Mar 8;315(10):1051-2 [PMID: 26954415]
  31. Diabetes Care. 2017 Oct;40(10):e145-e146 [PMID: 28774944]
  32. Diabetes Educ. 2008 May-Jun;34(3):445-9 [PMID: 18535317]
  33. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2019 Mar 01;10:135 [PMID: 30881349]
  34. J Med Internet Res. 2014 Apr 09;16(4):e104 [PMID: 24718852]
  35. N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 7;346(6):393-403 [PMID: 11832527]
  36. Front Endocrinol (Lausanne). 2017 Nov 27;8:318 [PMID: 29230195]

MeSH Term

Blood Glucose
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
Consensus
Diabetes Mellitus
Europe
Humans
Insulin
Insulin Infusion Systems
Mobile Applications
Smartphone
United States

Chemicals

Blood Glucose
Insulin

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0healthdiabetesDiabetestechnologydigitalappsdevicesAssociationDigitalpeopleavailablefieldmobilesafetyevidencemedicalorganisationsespeciallymanagedataclinicalvalidityEuropeanStudyEASDAmericanADAinsulinsystemsregulatoryauthoritiesmeetInternationalincludingMedicalensureissuesappapplications'apps'developingrapidlyhelpNumeroushealth-relatedprovidedsmartphoneswirelesssupportneedadopteitherlifestyleinterventionsmedicationadjustmentsresponseglucose-monitoringHoweverregulationsguidelinescaughtburgeoningstandardisereviewedmonitoredpatienteffectivenessremainslimitedthereforeconductedjointreviewcurrentlandscapestand-aloneopposedintegralregulateddevicepumpscontinuousglucosemonitoringautomateddeliverypracticesfoundacrossUSAEuropeintendedwellnesslargelyunregulatedunlessdefinitiontherapeuticand/ordiagnosticpurposesDeviceRegulatorsForumWHOmadestridesclassifyingdifferenttypesintegratingcontinuesdevelopbecomefullyintegratedeverydaylifewishbasedbestefficacyresultbringlightseveralcommunitypolicymakersprofessionalresearchershealthcareprofessionalsneedsaddresscanfullpotentialrangeinadequateaccuracylacktrainingprovisionpoorinteroperabilitystandardisationinsufficientsecurityconcludeseriesrecommendedactionsresolveshortcomingstechnology:benefitschallengesrecommendationsconsensusreportTechnologyWorkingGroupCEmarktherapyRegulatoryagenciesSmartphones

Similar Articles

Cited By