The Regulation of Plant Secondary Metabolism in Response to Abiotic Stress: Interactions Between Heat Shock and Elevated CO.

Nichola Austen, Heather J Walker, Janice Ann Lake, Gareth K Phoenix, Duncan Drummond Cameron
Author Information
  1. Nichola Austen: Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
  2. Heather J Walker: Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
  3. Janice Ann Lake: Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
  4. Gareth K Phoenix: Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.
  5. Duncan Drummond Cameron: Department of Animal and Plant Sciences, University of Sheffield, Sheffield, United Kingdom.

Abstract

Future climate change is set to have an impact on the physiological performance of global vegetation. Increasing temperature and atmospheric CO concentration will affect plant growth, net primary productivity, photosynthetic capability, and other biochemical functions that are essential for normal metabolic function. Alongside the primary metabolic function effects of plant growth and development, the effect of stress on plant secondary metabolism from both biotic and abiotic sources will be impacted by changes in future climate. Using an untargeted metabolomic fingerprinting approach alongside emissions measurements, we investigate for the first time how elevated atmospheric CO and temperature both independently and interactively impact on plant secondary metabolism through resource allocation, with a resulting "trade-off" between secondary metabolic processes in spp. and in particular, isoprene biosynthesis. Although it has been previously reported that isoprene is suppressed in times of elevated CO, and that isoprene emissions increase as a response to short-term heat shock, no study has investigated the interactive effects at the metabolic level. We have demonstrated that at a metabolic level isoprene is still being produced during periods of both elevated CO and temperature, and that ultimately temperature has the greater effect. With global temperature and atmospheric CO concentrations rising as a result of anthropogenic activity, it is imperative to understand the interactions between atmospheric processes and global vegetation, especially given that global isoprene emissions have the potential to contribute to atmospheric warming mitigation.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e32387 [PMID: 22384238]
  2. Nat Prod Rep. 2014 Aug;31(8):1043-55 [PMID: 24921065]
  3. Trends Plant Sci. 2010 Mar;15(3):154-66 [PMID: 20133178]
  4. New Phytol. 2015 Apr;206(2):578-82 [PMID: 25557381]
  5. Plant Physiol. 2006 Sep;142(1):135-47 [PMID: 16877698]
  6. Plant Cell Environ. 2008 Nov;31(11):1673-87 [PMID: 18721265]
  7. J Exp Bot. 2000 Feb;51(343):177-85 [PMID: 10938824]
  8. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43583 [PMID: 22916280]
  9. New Phytol. 2012 Aug;195(3):512-7 [PMID: 22686461]
  10. Oecologia. 1998 May;114(4):455-460 [PMID: 28307894]
  11. Plant Cell Physiol. 2014 Feb;55(2):341-57 [PMID: 24319073]
  12. Plant Physiol. 1997 Dec;115(4):1413-1420 [PMID: 12223874]
  13. New Phytol. 2007;175(2):244-54 [PMID: 17587373]
  14. Plant Cell Environ. 2014 Aug;37(8):1727-40 [PMID: 24471530]
  15. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 17;7(1):8498 [PMID: 28819265]
  16. Nat Biotechnol. 2008 Mar;26(3):303-4 [PMID: 18327243]
  17. Plant Cell Environ. 2015 May;38(5):892-904 [PMID: 24738572]
  18. Trends Plant Sci. 2014 Jul;19(7):439-46 [PMID: 24582468]
  19. Plant Cell Physiol. 2007 Sep;48(9):1254-62 [PMID: 17711876]
  20. J Exp Bot. 2005 Jan;56(410):287-96 [PMID: 15596481]
  21. Ann Bot. 2008 Jan;101(1):5-18 [PMID: 17921528]
  22. New Phytol. 2011 Apr;190(1):161-8 [PMID: 21175637]
  23. Electrophoresis. 2017 Sep;38(18):2242-2256 [PMID: 28426136]
  24. Food Chem. 2015 Dec 15;189:52-9 [PMID: 26190600]
  25. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Jun 12;104(24):10288-93 [PMID: 17519334]
  26. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2007 Feb;1768(2):198-206 [PMID: 17125733]
  27. Planta. 1993 Mar;189(3):420-4 [PMID: 24178500]
  28. Plant Mol Biol. 2010 Sep;74(1-2):61-75 [PMID: 20526857]
  29. Plant Signal Behav. 2011 Nov;6(11):1720-31 [PMID: 22041989]
  30. J Chem Ecol. 2007 Feb;33(2):287-96 [PMID: 17216360]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0COisoprenetemperatureatmosphericmetabolicglobalplantclimatesecondarymetabolismemissionselevatedchangeimpactvegetationwillgrowthprimaryfunctioneffectseffectstressabioticprocesseslevelFuturesetphysiologicalperformanceIncreasingconcentrationaffectnetproductivityphotosyntheticcapabilitybiochemicalfunctionsessentialnormalAlongsidedevelopmentbioticsourcesimpactedchangesfutureUsinguntargetedmetabolomicfingerprintingapproachalongsidemeasurementsinvestigatefirsttimeindependentlyinteractivelyresourceallocationresulting"trade-off"sppparticularbiosynthesisAlthoughpreviouslyreportedsuppressedtimesincreaseresponseshort-termheatshockstudyinvestigatedinteractivedemonstratedstillproducedperiodsultimatelygreaterconcentrationsrisingresultanthropogenicactivityimperativeunderstandinteractionsespeciallygivenpotentialcontributewarmingmitigationRegulationPlantSecondaryMetabolismResponseAbioticStress:InteractionsHeatShockElevatedflavonoidsmassspectrometrywillow

Similar Articles

Cited By