Reflective and critical thinking in nursing curriculum.

María Antonia Jiménez-Gómez, Lucila Cárdenas-Becerril, Margarita Betzabé Velásquez-Oyola, Marcela Carrillo-Pineda, Leyvi Yamile Barón-Díaz
Author Information
  1. María Antonia Jiménez-Gómez: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Enfermería, Bogotá, Colombia. ORCID
  2. Lucila Cárdenas-Becerril: Universidad Autónoma del Estado de México, Facultad de Enfermería, Toluca, México. ORCID
  3. Margarita Betzabé Velásquez-Oyola: Universidad Nacional José Faustino Sánchez Carrión, Facultad de Medicina Humana, Huacho, Lima, Peru. ORCID
  4. Marcela Carrillo-Pineda: Universidad de Antioquia, Facultad de Enfermería, Medellín, Colombia. ORCID
  5. Leyvi Yamile Barón-Díaz: Universidad Nacional de Colombia, Facultad de Medicina, Bogotá, Colombia. ORCID

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: to evaluate the teaching of transversal competence of the Reflective and Critical Thinking that is fundamental in the decision-making and solution of nursing problems, in degree programs of public and private institutions in the Andean region.
METHOD: multi-center, cross-sectional, exploratory-descriptive study, with mixed approach in 5 countries.
RESULTS: 76 nursing programs participated in the study. The Reflective and Critical Thinking was found as a subject, subject content and didactic strategies. Of the 562 subjects reviewed, this type of thinking is found in 46% of the humanities area and 42% in the area of research and professional discipline. It is important to train teachers to achieve coherence between the pedagogical model approach, teaching strategies and evaluations.
CONCLUSION: nursing programs in the Andean region contemplate the critical thinking as cognitive and personals skills of communication. They also use real situations analysis, supervised practice, simulation labs and specifically learning based in problems to develop the capacity to solve them, decision-making and develop communication skills, including analysis, synthesis and evaluation.

References

  1. Holist Nurs Pract. 1996 Apr;10(3):41-53 [PMID: 8707902]
  2. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 May;34(5):789-94 [PMID: 24035312]
  3. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Jan;34(1):67-72 [PMID: 23623746]
  4. J Prof Nurs. 2003 Nov-Dec;19(6):339-46 [PMID: 14689390]
  5. Asian Nurs Res (Korean Soc Nurs Sci). 2014 Jun;8(2):158-64 [PMID: 25030649]
  6. Nurse Educ Today. 2014 Nov;34(11):1357-60 [PMID: 24713126]
  7. J Nurs Educ. 1990 Sep;29(7):312-6 [PMID: 2172485]
  8. Nurse Educ Today. 2013 May;33(5):558-63 [PMID: 23058105]
  9. J Nurs Educ. 1990 Sep;29(7):295-9 [PMID: 2172482]
  10. Rev Lat Am Enfermagem. 2016 Sep 01;24:e2785 [PMID: 27598376]
  11. Nurse Educ Today. 2011 Feb;31(2):204-7 [PMID: 20655632]
  12. Nurse Educ. 1999 Sep-Oct;24(5):42-6 [PMID: 10795256]

MeSH Term

Attitude of Health Personnel
Clinical Competence
Cross-Sectional Studies
Curriculum
Decision Making
Education, Nursing
Education, Nursing, Baccalaureate
Female
Humans
Latin America
Learning
Male
Nursing
Students, Nursing
Thinking

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0nursingReflectiveprogramsthinkingteachingCriticalThinkingdecision-makingproblemsAndeanregionstudyapproachfoundsubjectstrategiesareacriticalskillscommunicationanalysisdevelopOBJECTIVE:evaluatetransversalcompetencefundamentalsolutiondegreepublicprivateinstitutionsMETHOD:multi-centercross-sectionalexploratory-descriptivemixed5countriesRESULTS:76participatedcontentdidactic562subjectsreviewedtype46%humanities42%researchprofessionaldisciplineimportanttrainteachersachievecoherencepedagogicalmodelevaluationsCONCLUSION:contemplatecognitivepersonalsalsouserealsituationssupervisedpracticesimulationlabsspecificallylearningbasedcapacitysolveincludingsynthesisevaluationcurriculum

Similar Articles

Cited By