A Review of the First Long-term Implantable Continuous Glucose Monitoring System Available in the United States.

Kevin Cowart
Author Information
  1. Kevin Cowart: Department of Pharmacotherapeutics and Clinical Research, Taneja College of Pharmacy, University of South Florida, Tampa, FL, USA. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Although real-time continuous glucose monitoring (rtCGM) has been shown to improve glycemic control in patients with type 1 diabetes mellitus and type 2 diabetes mellitus treated with insulin, rates of adoption have been low. A novel approach, with the use of a long-term implantable continuous glucose monitoring (LTI CGM) has the potential to overcome barriers to rtCGM. The purpose of this review is to provide a background on the first LTI CGM technology to be approved, along with a review of contraindications, interference, safety, accuracy, and efficacy. Considerations for patient selection are discussed based on the available evidence.
METHODS: PubMed, EMBASE, and Cochrane Library were searched for keywords and subject headings to identify studies assessing LTI CGM.
RESULTS: Seven studies were identified which assessed LTI CGM. Mean absolute relative difference is similar to available CGM devices. Rates of adverse events were low. Change in hemoglobin A1c with LTI CGM may be comparable to rtCGM.
CONCLUSIONS: Based on the available evidence, LTI CGM appears to be safe and accurate. Additional clinical trial investigation is warranted to evaluate the glycemic efficacy of LTI CGM.

Keywords

References

  1. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Nov;22(11):846-852 [PMID: 32453604]
  2. J Diabetes Sci Technol. 2011 May 01;5(3):668-75 [PMID: 21722581]
  3. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Mar;19(3):164-172 [PMID: 28263665]
  4. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 Dec;21(12):677-681 [PMID: 31385732]
  5. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2015 Nov;17(11):787-94 [PMID: 26171659]
  6. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2020 Jan;22(1):48-52 [PMID: 31418587]
  7. Contact Dermatitis. 2020 Feb;82(2):101-104 [PMID: 31463958]
  8. Diabetes Obes Metab. 2019 Jul;21(7):1689-1694 [PMID: 30938036]
  9. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 May;21(5):231-237 [PMID: 30925083]
  10. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 May;20(5):344-352 [PMID: 29600877]
  11. Diabetes Educ. 2019 Feb;45(1_suppl):3S-20S [PMID: 30541402]
  12. Ann Intern Med. 2017 Sep 19;167(6):365-374 [PMID: 28828487]
  13. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Mar;20(3):197-206 [PMID: 29381090]
  14. Lancet. 2016 Nov 5;388(10057):2254-2263 [PMID: 27634581]
  15. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2019 May;21(5):254-264 [PMID: 31021180]
  16. Diabetes Care. 2014 Oct;37(10):2702-9 [PMID: 25011947]
  17. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2018 Jun;20(6):428-433 [PMID: 29923775]
  18. Diabetes Care. 2017 Jan;40(1):63-68 [PMID: 27815290]
  19. Diabet Med. 2017 May;34(5):732 [PMID: 28103416]
  20. Diabetes Technol Ther. 2017 Aug;19(8):446-456 [PMID: 28700272]
  21. Diabetes Ther. 2017 Feb;8(1):55-73 [PMID: 28000140]
  22. JAMA. 2017 Jan 24;317(4):371-378 [PMID: 28118453]

MeSH Term

Blood Glucose
Blood Glucose Self-Monitoring
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 1
Diabetes Mellitus, Type 2
Humans
Insulin Infusion Systems
United States

Chemicals

Blood Glucose

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0CGMLTIglucosediabetescontinuousmonitoringrtCGMavailableglycemictypemellituslowimplantablereviewtechnologyefficacyevidencestudiesBACKGROUND:Althoughreal-timeshownimprovecontrolpatients12treatedinsulinratesadoptionnovelapproachuselong-termpotentialovercomebarrierspurposeprovidebackgroundfirstapprovedalongcontraindicationsinterferencesafetyaccuracyConsiderationspatientselectiondiscussedbasedMETHODS:PubMedEMBASECochraneLibrarysearchedkeywordssubjectheadingsidentifyassessingRESULTS:SevenidentifiedassessedMeanabsoluterelativedifferencesimilardevicesRatesadverseeventsChangehemoglobinA1cmaycomparableCONCLUSIONS:BasedappearssafeaccurateAdditionalclinicaltrialinvestigationwarrantedevaluateReviewFirstLong-termImplantableContinuousGlucoseMonitoringSystemAvailableUnitedStatessensor

Similar Articles

Cited By