A world map of evidence-based medicine: Density equalizing mapping of the Cochrane database of systematic reviews.

David A Groneberg, Stefan Rolle, Michael H K Bendels, Doris Klingelhöfer, Norman Schöffel, Jan Bauer, Dörthe Brüggmann
Author Information
  1. David A Groneberg: The Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  2. Stefan Rolle: The Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  3. Michael H K Bendels: The Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  4. Doris Klingelhöfer: The Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany. ORCID
  5. Norman Schöffel: The Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  6. Jan Bauer: The Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.
  7. Dörthe Brüggmann: The Institute of Occupational, Social and Environmental Medicine, Goethe University Frankfurt, Frankfurt, Germany.

Abstract

Systematic reviews represent the core and backbone of evidence-based medicine (EBM) strategies in all fields of medicine. In order to depict a first global sketch of the international efforts in the Cochrane database systematic reviews (CDSR), we analyzed the systematic reviews of the Cochrane database. Our global maps of systematic reviewing offer intriguing structural insights into the world of EBM strategies. They demonstrate that for the CDSR, the UK and Commonwealth countries take the lead position. Since patients, care providers and health systems all over the world benefit from systematic reviewing, institutions in other countries should increase their commitment.

References

  1. Nature. 2017 May 24;545(7655):S39 [PMID: 28538710]
  2. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2009 Jul;25 Suppl 1:182-95 [PMID: 19534840]
  3. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2015 Nov 17;12(11):14690-708 [PMID: 26593932]
  4. BMJ Open. 2016 Feb 12;6(2):e008322 [PMID: 26873042]
  5. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2009 Jun 26;4:16 [PMID: 19555514]
  6. Pancreas. 2016 Nov;45(10):1378-1385 [PMID: 27518470]
  7. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2004 May 18;101(20):7499-504 [PMID: 15136719]
  8. J Occup Med Toxicol. 2016 Sep 15;11:43 [PMID: 27651823]
  9. EMBO Rep. 2009 Aug;10(8):800-3 [PMID: 19648952]
  10. Laryngoscope. 2012 Sep;122(9):1967-73 [PMID: 22648552]
  11. Nature. 2016 Mar 17;531(7594):S97 [PMID: 26982025]
  12. Health Res Policy Syst. 2008 Jun 13;6:6 [PMID: 18554379]
  13. Clin Obstet Gynecol. 1998 Jun;41(2):315-31 [PMID: 9646964]
  14. PLoS Negl Trop Dis. 2015 Sep 25;9(9):e0004083 [PMID: 26406894]
  15. Epilepsia. 2017 Oct;58(10):1794-1802 [PMID: 28857143]
  16. Lancet. 2017 Jul 22;390(10092):415-423 [PMID: 28215660]
  17. Breast Cancer Res. 2010;12(6):R108 [PMID: 21176219]
  18. Int J Health Geogr. 2017 Jan 13;16(1):3 [PMID: 28086974]
  19. Intensive Care Med. 2018 Apr;44(4):515-517 [PMID: 29663047]

MeSH Term

Biomedical Research
Data Management
Databases, Factual
Evidence-Based Medicine
Global Health
Humans
Systematic Reviews as Topic

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0systematicreviewsCochranedatabaseworldevidence-basedmedicineEBMstrategiesglobalCDSRreviewingcountriesSystematicrepresentcorebackbonefieldsorderdepictfirstsketchinternationaleffortsanalyzedmapsofferintriguingstructuralinsightsdemonstrateUKCommonwealthtakeleadpositionSincepatientscareprovidershealthsystemsbenefitinstitutionsincreasecommitmentmapmedicine:Densityequalizingmapping

Similar Articles

Cited By