Imperfect but important: a fellow's perspective on journal peer review. - National Genomics Data Center (CNCB-NGDC)

Advanced Search

Imperfect but important: a fellow's perspective on journal peer review.

Natalie Neumann

Author Information

Natalie Neumann: Rocky Mountain Poison and Drug Safety, Denver Health and Hospital Authority, Denver, CO, USA. natalie.neumann@cuanschutz.edu. ORCID

PMID: 31853737 DOI: 10.1007/s13181-019-00751-w

No abstract text available.

Commentary JMT fellow editor in training Peer review

Acad Med. 2018 Mar;93(3):464-470 [PMID: 28767495]
Mol Biol Cell. 2011 Mar 1;22(5):525-7 [PMID: 21357757]
Ophthalmology. 2015 Oct;122(10):1958-9 [PMID: 26398048]
J Med Toxicol. 2017 Dec;13(4):275-277 [PMID: 29110200]
AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2005 Oct;185(4):848-54 [PMID: 16177399]
JAMA. 1986 Nov 7;256(17):2391-2 [PMID: 3773144]
Med Teach. 2012;34(9):698-704 [PMID: 22643022]

Biomedical Research

Editorial Policies

Humans

Peer Review, Research

Periodicals as Topic

Toxicology

Editorial

The Peer Review System: A Journal Editor's 30-Year Perspective.Journal peer review.Peer review and journal quality.Peer review in a multispecialty journal.Journal paper peer-review: a broken system?Review Commons-pre-journal peer review.Peer review: one perspective.Abstract Journal Younger Fellows.An editor's perspective on peer review.Peer review: is it important?

Fostering the Next Generation of Researchers: a Sustainable Mentoring Program for Early Career Toxicologists in Scientific Abstract Review.Scientists' perception of pilot study quality was influenced by statistical significance and study design.Enhancing scholarly discourse in the age of artificial intelligence: A guided approach to effective peer review process.