Empathy and compassion toward other species decrease with evolutionary divergence time.

Aurélien Miralles, Michel Raymond, Guillaume Lecointre
Author Information
  1. Aurélien Miralles: Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité, (UMR 7205 Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS UPMC EPHE, Sorbonne Universités), CP30, 25 rue Cuvier 75005, Paris, France. miralles.skink@gmail.com.
  2. Michel Raymond: ISEM, Univ Montpellier, CNRS, EPHE, IRD, Montpellier, France.
  3. Guillaume Lecointre: Institut de Systématique, Evolution, Biodiversité, (UMR 7205 Muséum national d'Histoire naturelle, CNRS UPMC EPHE, Sorbonne Universités), CP30, 25 rue Cuvier 75005, Paris, France.

Abstract

Currently the planet is inhabited by several millions of extremely diversified species. Not all of them arouse emotions of the same nature or intensity in humans. Little is known about the extent of our affective responses toward them and the factors that may explain these differences. Our online survey involved 3500 raters who had to make choices depending on specific questions designed to either assess their empathic perceptions or their compassionate reactions toward an extended photographic sampling of organisms. Results show a strong negative correlation between empathy scores and the divergence time separating them from us. However, beyond a certain time of divergence, our empathic perceptions stabilize at a minimum level. Compassion scores, although based on less spontaneous choices, remain strongly correlated to empathy scores and time of divergence. The mosaic of features characterizing humans has been acquired gradually over the course of the evolution, and the phylogenetically closer a species is to us, the more it shares common traits with us. Our results could be explained by the fact that many of these traits may arouse sensory biases. These anthropomorphic signals could be able to mobilize cognitive circuitry and to trigger prosocial behaviors usually at work in human relationships.

References

  1. Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Feb;21(2):59-60 [PMID: 28040334]
  2. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2019 May 28;116(22):10868-10873 [PMID: 30988189]
  3. Brain. 2010 May;133(Pt 5):1515-25 [PMID: 20371509]
  4. Curr Biol. 2014 Sep 22;24(18):R875-R878 [PMID: 25247366]
  5. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2016 Jan 19;371(1686):20150077 [PMID: 26644596]
  6. Naturwissenschaften. 2018 Nov 28;105(11-12):69 [PMID: 30488357]
  7. Trends Cogn Sci. 2017 Feb;21(2):60-61 [PMID: 28025006]
  8. Mol Biol Evol. 2017 Jul 1;34(7):1812-1819 [PMID: 28387841]
  9. J Evol Biol. 2013 Sep;26(9):1854-65 [PMID: 23848844]
  10. Sci Rep. 2017 Aug 22;7(1):9132 [PMID: 28831097]
  11. Behav Processes. 2014 Oct;108:80-6 [PMID: 25242725]
  12. Neurosci Lett. 2019 Feb 6;693:49-53 [PMID: 28668381]
  13. Mol Biol Evol. 2015 Apr;32(4):835-45 [PMID: 25739733]
  14. Am J Primatol. 2006 Jul;68(7):692-700 [PMID: 16786521]
  15. Transl Psychiatry. 2018 Mar 12;8(1):35 [PMID: 29527006]
  16. Proc Biol Sci. 2014 Feb 19;281(1780):20132404 [PMID: 24552836]
  17. Trends Neurosci. 2013 Aug;36(8):489-96 [PMID: 23746460]

MeSH Term

Animals
Empathy
Evolution, Molecular
Humans
Mice
Phylogeny

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0divergencetimespeciestowardscoresusarousehumansmaychoicesempathicperceptionsempathytraitsCurrentlyplanetinhabitedseveralmillionsextremelydiversifiedemotionsnatureintensityLittleknownextentaffectiveresponsesfactorsexplaindifferencesonlinesurveyinvolved3500ratersmakedependingspecificquestionsdesignedeitherassesscompassionatereactionsextendedphotographicsamplingorganismsResultsshowstrongnegativecorrelationseparatingHoweverbeyondcertainstabilizeminimumlevelCompassionalthoughbasedlessspontaneousremainstronglycorrelatedmosaicfeaturescharacterizingacquiredgraduallycourseevolutionphylogeneticallyclosersharescommonresultsexplainedfactmanysensorybiasesanthropomorphicsignalsablemobilizecognitivecircuitrytriggerprosocialbehaviorsusuallyworkhumanrelationshipsEmpathycompassiondecreaseevolutionary

Similar Articles

Cited By (32)