Simultaneous consonance in music perception and composition.

Peter M C Harrison, Marcus T Pearce
Author Information
  1. Peter M C Harrison: School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London. ORCID
  2. Marcus T Pearce: School of Electronic Engineering and Computer Science, Queen Mary University of London.

Abstract

Simultaneous consonance is a salient perceptual phenomenon corresponding to the perceived pleasantness of simultaneously sounding musical tones. Various competing theories of consonance have been proposed over the centuries, but recently a consensus has developed that simultaneous consonance is primarily driven by harmonicity perception. Here we question this view, substantiating our argument by critically reviewing historic consonance research from a broad variety of disciplines, reanalyzing consonance perception data from 4 previous behavioral studies representing more than 500 participants, and modeling three Western musical corpora representing more than 100,000 compositions. We conclude that simultaneous consonance is a composite phenomenon that derives in large part from three phenomena: interference, periodicity/harmonicity, and cultural familiarity. We formalize this conclusion with a computational model that predicts a musical chord's simultaneous consonance from these three features, and release this model in an open-source R package, incon, alongside 15 other computational models also evaluated in this paper. We hope that this package will facilitate further psychological and musicological research into simultaneous consonance. (PsycINFO Database Record (c) 2020 APA, all rights reserved).

References

  1. Tidsskr Nor Laegeforen. 1975 Feb 28;95(6):356-8 [PMID: 1121686]
  2. J Neurosci. 2009 Oct 21;29(42):13165-71 [PMID: 19846704]
  3. J Acoust Soc Am. 1984 Feb;75(2):626-8 [PMID: 6699300]
  4. Experientia. 1951 Apr 15;7(4):128-34 [PMID: 14831572]
  5. J Acoust Soc Am. 1982 Jun;71(6):1568-80 [PMID: 7108032]
  6. J Comp Psychol. 2015 Feb;129(1):42-51 [PMID: 25285599]
  7. PLoS One. 2009 Dec 03;4(12):e8144 [PMID: 19997506]
  8. Brain. 2002 Feb;125(Pt 2):238-51 [PMID: 11844725]
  9. J Neurosci Methods. 2009 Sep 30;183(1):95-106 [PMID: 19591870]
  10. J Acoust Soc Am. 1969 Jun;45(6):1451-9 [PMID: 5803168]
  11. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2010 Apr;81(4 Pt 1):041911 [PMID: 20481757]
  12. Iperception. 2016 Jun 27;7(3):2041669516655812 [PMID: 27433333]
  13. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Jan 2;115(1):216-221 [PMID: 29255031]
  14. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2010 Mar 9;107(10):4758-63 [PMID: 20176953]
  15. J Acoust Soc Am. 1965 Jun;37:1110-23 [PMID: 14339721]
  16. J Gen Psychol. 1968 Jul;79(1st Half):129-42 [PMID: 5672277]
  17. Neural Plast. 1999;6(4):147-72 [PMID: 10714267]
  18. J Acoust Soc Am. 1998 Mar;103(3):1261-71 [PMID: 9514016]
  19. Behav Processes. 2005 Sep 30;70(2):203-8 [PMID: 16043306]
  20. Br J Math Stat Psychol. 1966 Nov;19(2):163-79 [PMID: 5979110]
  21. Cognition. 2004 Dec;94(2):B11-21 [PMID: 15582619]
  22. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Sep;130(3):1488-502 [PMID: 21895089]
  23. Primates. 2010 Jan;51(1):7-12 [PMID: 19626392]
  24. J Acoust Soc Am. 1977 Jan;61(1):150-61 [PMID: 833366]
  25. J Acoust Soc Am. 1974 May;55(5):1061-9 [PMID: 4833699]
  26. Curr Biol. 2015 Aug 3;25(15):2051-6 [PMID: 26190070]
  27. Audiology. 1971 Jan-Feb;10(1):30-40 [PMID: 5163652]
  28. Percept Psychophys. 1987 Jan;41(1):73-84 [PMID: 3822747]
  29. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Oct;124(4):2186-95 [PMID: 19062858]
  30. Annu Rev Psychol. 2018 Jan 4;69:27-50 [PMID: 29035691]
  31. J Neurophysiol. 1996 Sep;76(3):1698-716 [PMID: 8890286]
  32. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2015 Sep 8;112(36):11155-60 [PMID: 26209651]
  33. J Acoust Soc Am. 2017 Dec;142(6):3748 [PMID: 29289060]
  34. J Acoust Soc Am. 1997 Sep;102(3):1811-20 [PMID: 9301058]
  35. J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform. 2014 Feb;40(1):40-9 [PMID: 23815480]
  36. J Acoust Soc Am. 1995 Aug;98(2 Pt 1):862-79 [PMID: 7642825]
  37. J Acoust Soc Am. 2005 Jun;117(6):3816-31 [PMID: 16018484]
  38. Hear Res. 2012 Mar;285(1-2):40-5 [PMID: 22326292]
  39. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 May;107(5 Pt 1):2631-44 [PMID: 10830385]
  40. J Neurosci. 2003 Aug 6;23(18):7160-8 [PMID: 12904476]
  41. J Acoust Soc Am. 1992 Jun;91(6):3511-26 [PMID: 1619127]
  42. J Comp Psychol. 2012 Feb;126(1):57-67 [PMID: 21942569]
  43. J Acoust Soc Am. 1969 Dec;46(6):1579-81 [PMID: 5361532]
  44. Front Psychol. 2018 Apr 04;9:381 [PMID: 29670552]
  45. J Acoust Soc Am. 1973 Aug;54(2):407-16 [PMID: 4759014]
  46. J Acoust Soc Am. 1969 Jun;45(6):1460-9 [PMID: 5803169]
  47. Psychol Sci. 2011 Oct;22(10):1270-3 [PMID: 21934134]
  48. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Nov 27;109(48):19858-63 [PMID: 23150582]
  49. J Acoust Soc Am. 2011 Nov;130(5):2902-16 [PMID: 22087919]
  50. J Acoust Soc Am. 2008 Oct;124(4):2320-9 [PMID: 19062870]
  51. J Acoust Soc Am. 1999 May;105(5):2773-82 [PMID: 10335629]
  52. J Acoust Soc Am. 2000 Dec;108(6):3073-8 [PMID: 11144600]
  53. J Assoc Res Otolaryngol. 2003 Dec;4(4):478-94 [PMID: 14716508]
  54. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2013 Nov;142(4):1142-58 [PMID: 23294344]
  55. J Neurosci. 2012 Nov 14;32(46):16149-61 [PMID: 23152599]
  56. Front Psychol. 2013 Aug 07;4:492 [PMID: 23966962]
  57. PLoS One. 2015 Apr 02;10(3):e0121945 [PMID: 25835001]
  58. Dev Sci. 2006 Jan;9(1):46-50 [PMID: 16445395]
  59. J Acoust Soc Am. 1965 Oct;38(4):548-60 [PMID: 5831012]
  60. J Acoust Soc Am. 1973 Dec;54(6):1496-516 [PMID: 4780803]
  61. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2011 Apr;64(4):625-38 [PMID: 21409740]
  62. Neuropsychologia. 2015 Nov;78:207-20 [PMID: 26455803]
  63. Nature. 2016 Jul 28;535(7613):547-50 [PMID: 27409816]
  64. Curr Biol. 2010 Jun 8;20(11):1035-41 [PMID: 20493704]
  65. J R Soc Interface. 2008 Dec 6;5(29):1429-34 [PMID: 18547910]
  66. Psychon Bull Rev. 1994 Jun;1(2):191-201 [PMID: 24203470]
  67. Percept Psychophys. 1996 Jan;58(1):124-41 [PMID: 8668513]
  68. Psychol Methods. 2007 Dec;12(4):399-413 [PMID: 18179351]
  69. J Comp Psychol. 2013 Aug;127(3):265-71 [PMID: 23566027]
  70. J Acoust Soc Am. 2012 Sep;132(3):1542-7 [PMID: 22978883]

MeSH Term

Auditory Perception
Culture
Humans
Models, Psychological
Music
Pleasure
Recognition, Psychology
Time Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0consonancesimultaneousmusicalperceptionthreeSimultaneousphenomenonresearchrepresentingcomputationalmodelpackagesalientperceptualcorrespondingperceivedpleasantnesssimultaneouslysoundingtonesVariouscompetingtheoriesproposedcenturiesrecentlyconsensusdevelopedprimarilydrivenharmonicityquestionviewsubstantiatingargumentcriticallyreviewinghistoricbroadvarietydisciplinesreanalyzingdata4previousbehavioralstudies500participantsmodelingWesterncorpora100000compositionsconcludecompositederiveslargepartphenomena:interferenceperiodicity/harmonicityculturalfamiliarityformalizeconclusionpredictschord'sfeaturesreleaseopen-sourceRinconalongside15modelsalsoevaluatedpaperhopewillfacilitatepsychologicalmusicologicalPsycINFODatabaseRecordc2020APArightsreservedmusiccomposition

Similar Articles

Cited By