Epidemiological characteristic of Orofacial clefts and its associated congenital anomalies: retrospective study.

A Impellizzeri, I Giannantoni, A Polimeni, E Barbato, G Galluccio
Author Information
  1. A Impellizzeri: Unit of Orthodontics, Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  2. I Giannantoni: Private Practice, Rome, Italy.
  3. A Polimeni: Department of Oral and Maxillo-facial Sciences, Pediatric Dentistry Unit, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  4. E Barbato: Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy.
  5. G Galluccio: Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Sciences, "Sapienza" University of Rome, Rome, Italy. gabriella.galluccio@uniroma1.it. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To evaluate the relationship between gender, ethnicity/citizenship, clinical phenotype, total prevalence, and the various congenital malformations associated with oral clefts (OC) in Italy across the period 2001-2014.
METHODS: A retrospective analysis (2001-2014) was conducted based on the National Congenital Malformation Registries network of Italy (Emilia-Romagna Registry of Birth Defects [IMER] and Registro Toscano Difetti Congeniti [RTDC]), which were analyzed to investigate time trends, geographical/ethnic clusters, topography, sex ratio, and associated congenital anomalies of OC phenotypes.
RESULTS: Among 739 registered cases, 29.8% were syndromic or had multi-malformed associated anomalies, compared with 70.2% having isolated orofacial cleft. Cleft lip (CL) was observed in 22%, cleft palate (CP) in 40%, and cleft lip and palate (CLP) in 38% of live births, stillbirths, and terminations of pregnancy for fetal anomaly cases. Other associated conditions were major anomalies of cardiovascular defects (39%), followed by defects of the limbs (28%), neuroectodermal defects (23%), and urogenital malformations (10%). Male-to-female sex ratio was 1:1.14 in CP, 1.22:1 in CL, and 1.9:1 in CLP. Foreigners were represented by 29% from Southeast Asia, 25% from Balkans, 25% from North-Central Africa, 9% from the East, 7% from Western Europe, and 5% from South America. Total prevalence of OC cases ranged from 0.9 (RTDC) to 1.1 (IMER) of 1000 births.
CONCLUSIONS: This retrospective study provides a population-based, clinical-epidemiological description of the orofacial cleft phenomenon. As a relatively frequent congenital malformation, its social and economic impact is worthy of further study. These abnormalities can cause significant problems that may be solved or minimized by early diagnosis and treatment.

Keywords

References

  1. J Med Genet. 1991 May;28(5):325-9 [PMID: 1842671]
  2. Am J Hum Genet. 2016 Apr 7;98(4):744-54 [PMID: 27018472]
  3. Saudi Med J. 2008 May;29(5):739-42 [PMID: 18454207]
  4. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2010 Mar;47(2):189-96 [PMID: 19860526]
  5. Hum Mol Genet. 2016 Jul 1;25(13):2862-2872 [PMID: 27033726]
  6. Ann Plast Surg. 2001 Nov;47(5):477-81 [PMID: 11716256]
  7. Am J Med Genet A. 2007 Mar 15;143A(6):528-37 [PMID: 17286264]
  8. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e54726 [PMID: 23349958]
  9. Am J Med Genet A. 2011 Jul;155A(7):1588-96 [PMID: 21671378]
  10. BMC Oral Health. 2005 Jun 28;5:4 [PMID: 15985166]
  11. Nat Rev Genet. 2011 Mar;12(3):167-78 [PMID: 21331089]
  12. B-ENT. 2006;2 Suppl 4:11-9 [PMID: 17366840]
  13. Acta Chir Plast. 1987;29(2):77-87 [PMID: 2444052]
  14. Stomatologiia (Mosk). 1990 Jan-Feb;69(1):71-2 [PMID: 2326819]
  15. J Craniofac Genet Dev Biol. 1991 Oct-Dec;11(4):277-91 [PMID: 1812129]
  16. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006 Jan;43(1):1-6 [PMID: 16405364]
  17. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1979 Oct 1;135(3):348-51 [PMID: 484624]
  18. Cleft Palate J. 1988 Jul;25(3):258-69 [PMID: 3262457]
  19. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2004 Nov;41(6):622-8 [PMID: 15516165]
  20. Stomatologija. 2017;19(3):78-83 [PMID: 29339670]
  21. Am J Med Genet A. 2004 Mar 15;125A(3):250-6 [PMID: 14994232]
  22. Am J Med Genet A. 2007 Oct 15;143A(20):2463-5 [PMID: 17847066]
  23. Hum Hered. 1995 May-Jun;45(3):157-64 [PMID: 7615301]
  24. Birth Defects Res A Clin Mol Teratol. 2003 Sep;67(9):637-42 [PMID: 14703786]
  25. Epidemiol Prev. 2000 Jan-Feb;24(1):21-7 [PMID: 10748547]
  26. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2000 Nov;37(6):596-7 [PMID: 11108530]
  27. Eur J Epidemiol. 1994 Jun;10(3):317-24 [PMID: 7859843]
  28. Am J Med Genet A. 2009 Jun;149A(6):1149-58 [PMID: 19441124]
  29. Am J Med Genet A. 2005 May 1;134(4):368-72 [PMID: 15779018]
  30. Am J Med Genet. 1998 Aug 27;79(1):42-7 [PMID: 9738868]
  31. Arch Pediatr. 2012 Oct;19(10):1021-9 [PMID: 22925539]
  32. Adv Dent Res. 2011 May;23(2):247-58 [PMID: 21490237]
  33. Paediatr Perinat Epidemiol. 2003 Jul;17(3):264-71 [PMID: 12839538]
  34. Cleft Palate Craniofac J. 2006 Sep;43(5):571-6 [PMID: 16986995]
  35. Pediatrics. 1997 Aug;100(2 Pt 1):180-6 [PMID: 9240796]
  36. Lancet. 2009 Nov 21;374(9703):1773-85 [PMID: 19747722]

MeSH Term

Cleft Lip
Cleft Palate
Europe
Female
Humans
Italy
Male
Pregnancy
Prevalence
Retrospective Studies

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0associatedcongenitalcleft1studyOCretrospectiveanomaliescasesCleftlippalatedefectsprevalencemalformationscleftsItaly2001-2014sexratioorofacialCLCPCLPbirths25%BACKGROUND:evaluaterelationshipgenderethnicity/citizenshipclinicalphenotypetotalvariousoralacrossperiodMETHODS:analysisconductedbasedNationalCongenitalMalformationRegistriesnetworkEmilia-RomagnaRegistryBirthDefects[IMER]RegistroToscanoDifettiCongeniti[RTDC]analyzedinvestigatetimetrendsgeographical/ethnicclusterstopographyphenotypesRESULTS:Among739registered298%syndromicmulti-malformedcompared702%isolatedobserved22%40%38%livestillbirthsterminationspregnancyfetalanomalyconditionsmajorcardiovascular39%followedlimbs28%neuroectodermal23%urogenital10%Male-to-female1:11422:19:1Foreignersrepresented29%SoutheastAsiaBalkansNorth-CentralAfrica9%East7%WesternEurope5%SouthAmericaTotalranged09RTDCIMER1000CONCLUSIONS:providespopulation-basedclinical-epidemiologicaldescriptionphenomenonrelativelyfrequentmalformationsocialeconomicimpactworthyabnormalitiescancausesignificantproblemsmaysolvedminimizedearlydiagnosistreatmentEpidemiologicalcharacteristicOrofacialanomalies:EpidemiologyEthnicityGenderLongitudinalregisterPrevalence

Similar Articles

Cited By