Influence of growth temperature on thermal tolerance of leading foodborne pathogens.

Chyer Kim, Rana Alrefaei, Mariam Bushlaibi, Eunice Ndegwa, Paul Kaseloo, Crystal Wynn
Author Information
  1. Chyer Kim: Agricultural Research Station Virginia State University Petersburg VA USA. ORCID
  2. Rana Alrefaei: Department of Biology Virginia State University Petersburg VA USA.
  3. Mariam Bushlaibi: Department of Biology Virginia State University Petersburg VA USA.
  4. Eunice Ndegwa: Agricultural Research Station Virginia State University Petersburg VA USA.
  5. Paul Kaseloo: Department of Biology Virginia State University Petersburg VA USA.
  6. Crystal Wynn: Department of Family and Consumer Sciences Virginia State University Petersburg VA USA.

Abstract

Accurate prediction of the thermal destruction rate of foodborne pathogens is important for food processors to ensure proper food safety. When bacteria are subjected to thermal stress during storage, sublethal stresses and/or thermal acclimation may lead to differences in their subsequent tolerance to thermal treatment. The aim of the current study was to evaluate the thermal tolerance of O157:H7, , , and that are incubated during overnight growth in tryptic soy broth at four temperatures (15, 25, 35, and 45°C). Following incubation, the bacteria were subjected to thermal treatments at 55, 60, and 65°C. At the end of each treatment time, bacterial survival was quantified and further calculated for the thermal death decimal reduction time (value) and thermal destruction temperature (value) using a linear model for thermal treatment time (min) vs. microbial population (Log CFU/ml) and thermal treatment temperature (°C) vs. value, respectively, for each bacterium. Among the four bacterial species, generally had longer values and lower values than did other bacteria. Increasing patterns of and values in were obtained with the increment of incubation temperatures from 15 to 45°C. The values of (6.19°C), (6.73°C), (7.10°C), and (7.26°C) were the highest at 15, 25, 35, and 45°C, respectively. Although further research is needed to validate the findings on food matrix, findings in this study clearly affirm that adaptation of bacteria to certain stresses may reduce the effectiveness of preservation hurdles applied during later stages of food processing and storage.

Keywords

References

  1. J Appl Microbiol. 2010 Dec;109(6):2118-27 [PMID: 20846334]
  2. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1997 Apr;63(4):1252-5 [PMID: 9097420]
  3. J Food Prot. 2001 Jul;64(7):970-4 [PMID: 11456205]
  4. J Food Prot. 1998 Apr;61(4):395-401 [PMID: 9709200]
  5. Genes Dev. 1994 Jul 1;8(13):1600-12 [PMID: 7525405]
  6. J Food Prot. 1991 Oct;54(10):762-766 [PMID: 31051522]
  7. J Food Prot. 1996 Mar;59(3):230-7 [PMID: 10463438]
  8. J Bacteriol. 2004 Jul;186(13):4192-8 [PMID: 15205421]
  9. J Sci Food Agric. 2014 Aug;94(11):2274-81 [PMID: 24374973]
  10. Adv Appl Microbiol. 1978;23:219-43 [PMID: 28641]
  11. Food Sci Nutr. 2019 Nov 16;7(12):4027-4036 [PMID: 31890183]
  12. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2011 Nov;77(22):8088-96 [PMID: 21908630]
  13. J Food Prot. 2009 Aug;72(8):1727-31 [PMID: 19722409]
  14. Acta Vet Scand. 2003;44(1-2):1-19 [PMID: 14650540]
  15. J Food Prot. 2016 Sep;79(9):1468-1474 [PMID: 28221931]
  16. J Food Prot. 2009 Mar;72(3):503-9 [PMID: 19343937]
  17. J Appl Microbiol. 2005;99(5):1229-35 [PMID: 16238754]
  18. Food Microbiol. 2008 Apr;25(2):294-303 [PMID: 18206772]
  19. Microbiology (Reading). 2009 Sep;155(Pt 9):2907-2918 [PMID: 19497950]
  20. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1996 Feb;22(2):121-4 [PMID: 8936371]
  21. Symp Ser Soc Appl Microbiol. 2000;(29):79S-89S [PMID: 10880182]
  22. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1998 Dec;64(12):4658-62 [PMID: 9835545]
  23. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1999 Apr;65(4):1564-9 [PMID: 10103251]
  24. J Appl Bacteriol. 1970 Sep;33(3):515-22 [PMID: 5491626]
  25. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1995 May;61(5):2037-9 [PMID: 7646045]
  26. Lett Appl Microbiol. 1998 Apr;26(4):325-30 [PMID: 9633099]
  27. Biochim Biophys Acta. 2006 Jan-Feb;1759(1-2):51-9 [PMID: 16574257]
  28. J Gen Microbiol. 1981 Feb;122(2):357-61 [PMID: 7033451]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0thermalfoodbacteriatreatmenttemperaturevaluesdestructionfoodbornepathogenstolerance1545°Cincubationtimevalueratesubjectedstoragestressesmaystudygrowthfourtemperatures2535bacterialvsrespectively67findingsAccuratepredictionimportantprocessorsensurepropersafetystresssublethaland/oracclimationleaddifferencessubsequentaimcurrentevaluateO157:H7incubatedovernighttrypticsoybrothFollowingtreatments556065°CendsurvivalquantifiedcalculateddeathdecimalreductionusinglinearmodelminmicrobialpopulationLogCFU/ml°CbacteriumAmongspeciesgenerallylongerlowerIncreasingpatternsobtainedincrement19°C73°C10°C26°ChighestAlthoughresearchneededvalidatematrixclearlyaffirmadaptationcertainreduceeffectivenesspreservationhurdlesappliedlaterstagesprocessingInfluenceleadingD‐valuez‐value

Similar Articles

Cited By