Differential Analgesia From Vibratory Stimulation During Local Injection of Anesthetic: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Rashek Kazi, Panayiota Govas, Rachel M Slaugenhaupt, Bryan T Carroll
Author Information
  1. Rashek Kazi: Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  2. Panayiota Govas: Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  3. Rachel M Slaugenhaupt: Department of Dermatology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.
  4. Bryan T Carroll: Department of Pharmacology, University of Pittsburgh School of Medicine, Pittsburgh, Pennsylvania.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Inadequate pain reduction during anesthetic injection is a significant medical and surgical problem. Vibratory distraction reduces this pain; however, there are minimal data identifying those who respond best.
OBJECTIVE: To quantify analgesia from vibration before anesthetic injection.
MATERIALS AND METHODS: In this partially blinded, single-institution trial, adult participants were randomized to intervention (vibratory anesthetic device, VAD ON) or placebo (VAD OFF). Pain was assessed using the 11-point numeric rating scale (NRS). Relative reduction in NRS between VAD OFF and ON was used to identify minimum clinically important and substantially clinically important difference in pain.
RESULTS: One hundred one tested sites from 87 subjects were assessed. Sixty-three percent were men with a median age of 66 years. From univariate analysis, males, subjects aged <60, and head and neck (HN) treated subjects had a significant reduction in NRS (p < .05). Multivariate analysis identified NRS reductions in females <60 (p = .012), males ≥70 (p = .002), females and males treated on HN (p = .048 and p = .035, respectively), and males ≥70 treated on HN (p = .012). Substantially clinically important difference (≥57% NRS reduction) included subjects <60, females <70, HN treatment aged 60 to 69, males ≥70, and females treated on HN.
CONCLUSION: Vibratory anesthetic device reduces pain during anesthetic injection, primarily for HN treatments and older male subjects.

Associated Data

ClinicalTrials.gov | NCT03467685

References

  1. Aesthet Surg J. 2011 Nov;31(8):966-71 [PMID: 22001341]
  2. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2011 Dec;27(12):1151-6 [PMID: 22134226]
  3. Acad Emerg Med. 1995 Apr;2(4):254-8 [PMID: 11727685]
  4. Plast Surg Nurs. 2016 Apr-Jun;36(2):63-8 [PMID: 27254235]
  5. Scand J Pain. 2018 Jan 26;18(1):99-107 [PMID: 29794282]
  6. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2011 Dec;65(6):1231-3 [PMID: 22082846]
  7. Dermatol Surg. 2015 Mar;41(3):397-403 [PMID: 25705954]
  8. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2010 Jul;63(1):79-86 [PMID: 20542176]
  9. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013 Sep;132(3):675-684 [PMID: 23985640]
  10. Pain. 2001 Nov;94(2):149-158 [PMID: 11690728]
  11. Man Ther. 2009 Oct;14(5):526-30 [PMID: 18996731]
  12. Pain. 2005 Jan;113(1-2):134-40 [PMID: 15621373]
  13. BMC Med. 2017 Feb 20;15(1):35 [PMID: 28215182]
  14. AAOHN J. 2001 Jun;49(6):286-92 [PMID: 11760527]
  15. Compend Contin Educ Dent. 2017 Jun;38(6):e5-e8 [PMID: 28586233]
  16. Aesthetic Plast Surg. 2014 Apr;38(2):413-8 [PMID: 24464122]
  17. J Dent Anesth Pain Med. 2019 Jun;19(3):143-149 [PMID: 31338420]
  18. Anesth Analg. 1998 Feb;86(2):379-81 [PMID: 9459252]
  19. J Dent Child (Chic). 2018 May 15;85(2):51-57 [PMID: 30345954]
  20. Eur Arch Paediatr Dent. 2019 Apr;20(2):79-84 [PMID: 30519955]
  21. Dermatol Online J. 2004 Oct 15;10(2):1 [PMID: 15530291]
  22. MCN Am J Matern Child Nurs. 2012 Sep;37(5):339-45 [PMID: 22895207]
  23. Dermatol Surg. 2016 Jun;42(6):788-90 [PMID: 27176866]
  24. Nat Rev Neurosci. 2012 Dec;13(12):859-66 [PMID: 23165262]
  25. JAMA Dermatol. 2013 Mar;149(3):317-21 [PMID: 23682368]
  26. Dermatol Surg. 2019 Feb;45(2):303-306 [PMID: 29659407]
  27. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2009 Mar-Apr;34(2):122-5 [PMID: 19282711]
  28. Ear Nose Throat J. 2019 Jul;98(6):351-355 [PMID: 31072196]
  29. Int J Paediatr Dent. 2018 Jan;28(1):102-110 [PMID: 28646527]
  30. Dermatol Surg. 2013 Jun;39(6):857-63 [PMID: 23464845]
  31. Anesth Analg. 2003 Aug;97(2):534-40, table of contents [PMID: 12873949]
  32. J Indian Soc Pedod Prev Dent. 2015 Jul-Sep;33(3):173-6 [PMID: 26156269]
  33. BMJ Open. 2019 Jul 2;9(7):e029460 [PMID: 31270121]
  34. Dent Clin North Am. 2010 Oct;54(4):731-44 [PMID: 20831935]
  35. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Oct;73(4):533-40; quiz 541-2 [PMID: 26369838]
  36. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2019 Jan;80(1):58-59 [PMID: 30130597]
  37. Dermatol Surg. 2017 Dec;43 Suppl 3:S329-S335 [PMID: 29016544]
  38. Dermatol Surg. 2017 May;43(5):724-727 [PMID: 28244902]
  39. Clin J Pain. 2009 Oct;25(8):705-10 [PMID: 19920721]
  40. Aust Dent J. 2009 Jun;54(2):94-100 [PMID: 19473149]
  41. Pain. 2011 Oct;152(10):2399-2404 [PMID: 21856077]
  42. Pediatr Emerg Care. 2014 Oct;30(10):686-8 [PMID: 25272070]
  43. Dermatol Surg. 2011 Jul;37(7):1007-13 [PMID: 21561527]
  44. Eplasty. 2016 Feb 04;16:e9 [PMID: 26933468]
  45. J Pain Res. 2018 Nov 08;11:2729-2739 [PMID: 30519077]
  46. JAMA Dermatol. 2015 Nov;151(11):1194-9 [PMID: 26352252]
  47. J Clin Exp Dent. 2015 Feb 01;7(1):e23-7 [PMID: 25810837]
  48. Br J Anaesth. 2013 Jul;111(1):52-8 [PMID: 23794645]
  49. Pediatr Dermatol. 2019 May;36(3):414-415 [PMID: 30861174]
  50. Int J Gen Med. 2013 Sep 25;6:817-20 [PMID: 24101880]
  51. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2016 Sep;75(3):590-594 [PMID: 27125530]
  52. Rev Med Chil. 2012 Feb;140(2):192-7 [PMID: 22739948]
  53. J Am Acad Dermatol. 2015 Oct;73(4):543-60; quiz 561-2 [PMID: 26369839]

Grants

  1. UL1 TR001857/NCATS NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Analgesia
Anesthetics, Local
Female
Humans
Injections, Subcutaneous
Male
Middle Aged
Mohs Surgery
Pain Measurement
Pain, Procedural
Treatment Outcome
Vibration

Chemicals

Anesthetics, Local

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0HNpanestheticNRSsubjectsmales=painreductiontreatedfemalesinjectionVibratoryVADclinicallyimportant<60≥70significantreducesdeviceONOFFassesseddifferenceanalysisaged012BACKGROUND:InadequatemedicalsurgicalproblemdistractionhoweverminimaldataidentifyingrespondbestOBJECTIVE:quantifyanalgesiavibrationMATERIALSANDMETHODS:partiallyblindedsingle-institutiontrialadultparticipantsrandomizedinterventionvibratoryplaceboPainusing11-pointnumericratingscaleRelativeusedidentifyminimumsubstantiallyRESULTS:Onehundredonetestedsites87Sixty-threepercentmenmedianage66yearsunivariateheadneck<05Multivariateidentifiedreductions002048035respectivelySubstantially≥57%included<70treatment6069CONCLUSION:primarilytreatmentsoldermaleDifferentialAnalgesiaStimulationLocalInjectionAnesthetic:RandomizedClinicalTrial

Similar Articles

Cited By