Biosolids inhibit uptake and translocation of C-carbamazepine by edible vegetables in soil.

Ming Li, Tengda Ding, Haiyan Wang, Wei Wang, Qingfu Ye, Juying Li
Author Information
  1. Ming Li: College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
  2. Tengda Ding: College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China.
  3. Haiyan Wang: Institute of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310029, China.
  4. Wei Wang: Institute of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310029, China.
  5. Qingfu Ye: Institute of Nuclear Agricultural Sciences, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, 310029, China.
  6. Juying Li: College of Chemistry and Environmental Engineering, Shenzhen University, Shenzhen, 518060, China. jyli@szu.edu.cn. ORCID

Abstract

Biosolids are regarded as a major source of pharmaceutically active compounds (PhACs) in soil and may lead to their accumulation in plants and potential human risks through dietary intake. Using C labeling, we explored the effect of biosolids on the uptake and tissue distribution of carbamazepine (CAB) by three ready-to-eat vegetables (i.e., carrot, celery, and pak choi) under greenhouse conditions. The C-CAB was consistently detected in vegetables and plant tissues with bioconcentration factors in a range of 1.28-37.69, and it was easily translocated from root to leaf and/or stem with translocation factors > 1. The inhibition on the uptake and accumulation of C-labeled carbamazepine from soil by the addition of biosolids was consistently observed, and such inhibitory effect was related to the biosolid amendment rates, the category of vegetable, and the plant growth stages. The influence of biosolids on behavior of CAB and other emerging pollutants in the soil-plant system should be considered in their environmental risk assessment.

Keywords

References

  1. Water Res. 2016 Oct 1;102:117-124 [PMID: 27337347]
  2. Environ Sci Technol. 2010 Aug 15;44(16):6157-61 [PMID: 20704212]
  3. Environ Sci Technol. 2014 May 20;48(10):5593-600 [PMID: 24749778]
  4. Environ Res. 2018 Aug;165:258-266 [PMID: 29734026]
  5. Environ Sci Technol. 2015 Oct 20;49(20):12509-18 [PMID: 26418514]
  6. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2012 Nov;85:104-9 [PMID: 22921256]
  7. J Environ Monit. 2012 Nov;14(11):3029-36 [PMID: 23051741]
  8. Sci Total Environ. 2015 Dec 15;538:350-62 [PMID: 26312409]
  9. Environ Res. 2016 Apr;146:282-98 [PMID: 26775009]
  10. Sci Total Environ. 2010 Mar 15;408(8):1902-8 [PMID: 20153514]
  11. Environ Res. 2015 Nov;143(Pt B):56-64 [PMID: 26409498]
  12. Environ Sci Technol. 2006 Dec 1;40(23):7207-15 [PMID: 17180968]
  13. J Hazard Mater. 2017 Feb 5;323(Pt A):147-155 [PMID: 27236837]
  14. Sci Total Environ. 2010 Aug 1;408(17):3689-95 [PMID: 20537370]
  15. J Environ Qual. 2006 Aug 09;35(5):1779-83 [PMID: 16899748]
  16. Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Apr 16;47(8):3678-84 [PMID: 23506704]
  17. Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Oct 7;48(19):11286-93 [PMID: 25211705]
  18. J Agric Food Chem. 2012 Oct 17;60(41):10203-11 [PMID: 23003104]
  19. Environ Sci Technol. 2014 Aug 19;48(16):9325-33 [PMID: 25026038]
  20. Sci Total Environ. 2014 Oct 15;496:461-470 [PMID: 25108248]
  21. Chemosphere. 2016 Aug;156:236-244 [PMID: 27179241]
  22. Sci Total Environ. 2014 Oct 15;496:499-509 [PMID: 25108252]
  23. Chemosphere. 2011 Feb;82(6):905-10 [PMID: 21071061]
  24. Environ Pollut. 2013 Nov;182:150-6 [PMID: 23911624]
  25. J Agric Food Chem. 2014 Jan 29;62(4):816-25 [PMID: 24405013]
  26. Environ Toxicol Chem. 2004 May;23(5):1344-54 [PMID: 15180389]
  27. Environ Pollut. 2018 Jan;232:164-172 [PMID: 28935405]
  28. Aquat Toxicol. 2011 Oct;105(3-4):428-37 [PMID: 21872554]
  29. J Agric Food Chem. 2009 Jun 10;57(11):4900-5 [PMID: 19441835]
  30. Sci Total Environ. 2015 Dec 1;536:655-666 [PMID: 26254067]
  31. Ecotoxicol Environ Saf. 2011 Mar;74(3):319-27 [PMID: 20971511]
  32. Sci Total Environ. 2009 Nov 15;407(23):5978-85 [PMID: 19733902]
  33. Environ Sci Technol. 2013 Nov 19;47(22):12768-74 [PMID: 23985071]
  34. Chemosphere. 2008 Nov;73(8):1335-43 [PMID: 18703215]
  35. Water Res. 2010 Jan;44(2):658-68 [PMID: 20106500]
  36. Environ Pollut. 2017 Jan;220(Pt A):400-406 [PMID: 27692886]
  37. Environ Int. 2013 Oct;60:15-22 [PMID: 23973619]
  38. Chemosphere. 2010 Mar;78(11):1416-21 [PMID: 20096438]
  39. Chemosphere. 2016 Oct;160:22-9 [PMID: 27351902]
  40. Aquat Toxicol. 2009 Sep 14;94(3):177-85 [PMID: 19632730]
  41. Neurology. 1992 Apr;42(4 Suppl 5):68-74 [PMID: 1574179]

Grants

  1. 21777104/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. 21477105/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. 2017A030313226/Natural Science Foundation of Guangdong Province
  4. JCYJ20170818142823471/Shenzhen Science and Technology Innovation Commission (CN)

MeSH Term

Biosolids
Carbamazepine
Humans
Soil
Soil Pollutants
Vegetables

Chemicals

Biosolids
Soil
Soil Pollutants
Carbamazepine

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0uptakeBiosolidssoilbiosolidsvegetablesaccumulationeffectcarbamazepineCABconsistentlyplantfactorstranslocationregardedmajorsourcepharmaceuticallyactivecompoundsPhACsmayleadplantspotentialhumanrisksdietaryintakeUsingClabelingexploredtissuedistributionthreeready-to-eatiecarrotcelerypakchoigreenhouseconditionsC-CABdetectedtissuesbioconcentrationrange128-3769easilytranslocatedrootleafand/orstem> 1inhibitionC-labeledadditionobservedinhibitoryrelatedbiosolidamendmentratescategoryvegetablegrowthstagesinfluencebehavioremergingpollutantssoil-plantsystemconsideredenvironmentalriskassessmentinhibitC-carbamazepineedible14C-CarbamazepineEmergingcontaminantsPlantTranslocation

Similar Articles

Cited By