Diagnostic efficacy and molecular testing by combined fine-needle aspiration and core needle biopsy in patients with a lung nodule.

Lan Chen, He Jing, Yun Gong, Alda L Tam, John Stewart, Gregg Staerkel, Ming Guo
Author Information
  1. Lan Chen: Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. ORCID
  2. He Jing: Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  3. Yun Gong: Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. ORCID
  4. Alda L Tam: Department of Interventional Radiology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  5. John Stewart: Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  6. Gregg Staerkel: Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas.
  7. Ming Guo: Department of Pathology, The University of Texas MD Anderson Cancer Center, Houston, Texas. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Combined image-guided fine-needle aspiration biopsy (FNA) and core needle biopsy (CNB) has become the standard of care for diagnosis and/or molecular testing for patients with a solitary lung nodule at our institution. Our purpose was to evaluate the efficacy of this practice.
METHODS: We identified patients who underwent combined lung FNA/CNB during 2012 at our institution. A total of 667 patients who underwent 682 combined lung FNA/CNB procedures were included in the study, including 355 men and 312 women. Combined lung FNA/CNB procedures were performed by a radiologist. The adequacy of FNA specimens was assessed immediately by a cytopathologist. The FNA and CNB specimens were interpreted separately by a cytopathologist and a surgical pathologist, respectively. The diagnostic accuracy of the combined technique was determined.
RESULTS: The rate of diagnostic consistency between FNA and CNB was 83.4%, and the rate of diagnostic accuracy for malignancy was 98.5% for combined FNA/CNB. Combined FNA/CNB showed a high diagnostic efficacy for malignancy (sensitivity, 97.6%; specificity, 100%). Combined FNA/CNB had a lower false-negative rate for malignancy (2.2%) than either FNA (7.2%) or CNB (6.2%) alone. FNA contributed to 10.3% of molecular analyses as a complementary tissue source.
CONCLUSIONS: Combined lung FNA/CNB has high diagnostic efficacy for malignancy and a lower false-negative rate than either procedure alone. FNA was a valuable complement to CNB for molecular testing, potentially reducing patient inconvenience and morbidity associated with repeated lung needle biopsy.

Keywords

References

  1. Yao X, Gomes MM, Tsao MS, Allen CJ, Geddie W, Sekhon H. Fine-needle aspiration biopsy versus core-needle biopsy in diagnosing lung cancer: a systematic review. Curr Oncol. 2012;19:e16-e27.
  2. Zhang HF, Zeng XT, Xing F, Fan N, Liao MY. The diagnostic accuracy of CT-guided percutaneous core needle biopsy and fine needle aspiration in pulmonary lesions: a meta-analysis. Clin Radiol. 2016;71:e1-e10.
  3. Wallace MJ, Krishnamurthy S, Broemeling LD, et al. CT-guided percutaneous fine-needle aspiration biopsy of small (< or =1-cm) pulmonary lesions. Radiology. 2002;225:823-828.
  4. Gong Y, Sneige N, Guo M, Hicks ME, Moran CA. Transthoracic fine-needle aspiration vs concurrent core needle biopsy in diagnosis of intrathoracic lesions: a retrospective comparison of diagnostic accuracy. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006;125:438-444.
  5. Tam AL, Lim HJ, Wistuba II, et al. Image-guided biopsy in the era of personalized cancer care: proceedings from the Society of Interventional Radiology Research Consensus Panel. J Vasc Interv Radiol. 2016;27:8-19.
  6. Lee C, Guichet PL, Abtin F. Percutaneous lung biopsy in the molecular profiling era: a survey of current practices. J Thorac Imaging. 2017;32:63-67.
  7. Aviram G, Greif J, Man A, et al. Diagnosis of intrathoracic lesions: are sequential fine-needle aspiration (FNA) and core needle biopsy (CNB) combined better than either investigation alone? Clin Radiol. 2007;62:221-226.
  8. Kim HK, Shin BK, Cho SJ, et al. Transthoracic fine needle aspiration and core biopsy of pulmonary lesions. A study of 296 patients. Acta Cytol. 2002;46:1061-1068.
  9. Yamagami T, Iida S, Kato T, Tanaka O, Nishimura T. Combining fine-needle aspiration and core biopsy under CT fluoroscopy guidance: a better way to treat patients with lung nodules? AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2003;180:811-815.
  10. Staroselsky AN, Schwarz Y, Man A, Marmur S, Greif J. Additional information from percutaneous cutting needle biopsy following fine-needle aspiration in the diagnosis of chest lesions. Chest. 1998;113:1522-1525.
  11. Moulton JS, Moore PT. Coaxial percutaneous biopsy technique with automated biopsy devices: value in improving accuracy and negative predictive value. Radiology. 1993;186:515-522.
  12. Coley SM, Crapanzano JP, Saqi A. FNA, core biopsy, or both for the diagnosis of lung carcinoma: obtaining sufficient tissue for a specific diagnosis and molecular testing. Cancer Cytopathol. 2015;123:318-326.
  13. Kim ES, Herbst RS, Wistuba II, et al. The BATTLE trial: personalizing therapy for lung cancer. Cancer Discov. 2011;1:44-53.
  14. Minot DM, Gilman EA, Aubry MC, et al. An investigation into false-negative transthoracic fine needle aspiration and core biopsy specimens. Diagn Cytopathol. 2014;42:1063-1068.
  15. Tam AL, Kim ES, Lee JJ, et al. Feasibility of image-guided transthoracic core-needle biopsy in the BATTLE lung trial. J Thorac Oncol. 2013;8:436-442.
  16. Overman MJ, Modak J, Kopetz S, et al. Use of research biopsies in clinical trials: are risks and benefits adequately discussed? J Clin Oncol. 2013;31:17-22.
  17. Schneider F, Smith MA, Lane MC, Pantanowitz L, Dacic S, Ohori NP. Adequacy of core needle biopsy specimens and fine-needle aspirates for molecular testing of lung adenocarcinomas. Am J Clin Pathol. 2015;143:193-200; quiz 306.

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Aged, 80 and over
Biopsy, Fine-Needle
Biopsy, Large-Core Needle
Diagnosis, Differential
Female
Genetic Testing
Humans
Image-Guided Biopsy
Lung
Lung Neoplasms
Male
Middle Aged
Sensitivity and Specificity
Solitary Pulmonary Nodule
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0FNAlungFNA/CNBCombinedbiopsyCNBmolecularcombineddiagnosticneedletestingpatientsefficacyratemalignancyfine-needleaspirationcore2%noduleinstitutionunderwentproceduresspecimenscytopathologistaccuracyhighlowerfalse-negativeeitheraloneBACKGROUND:image-guidedbecomestandardcarediagnosisand/orsolitarypurposeevaluatepracticeMETHODS:identified2012total667682includedstudyincluding355men312womenperformedradiologistadequacyassessedimmediatelyinterpretedseparatelysurgicalpathologistrespectivelytechniquedeterminedRESULTS:consistency834%985%showedsensitivity976%specificity100%276contributed103%analysescomplementarytissuesourceCONCLUSIONS:procedurevaluablecomplementpotentiallyreducingpatientinconveniencemorbidityassociatedrepeatedDiagnosticcarcinoma

Similar Articles

Cited By