Urinary organophosphate ester concentrations in relation to ultra-processed food consumption in the general US population.

Hyunju Kim, Casey M Rebholz, Eugenia Wong, Jessie P Buckley
Author Information
  1. Hyunju Kim: Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  2. Casey M Rebholz: Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  3. Eugenia Wong: Department of Epidemiology, Gillings School of Global Public Health, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill, Chapel Hill, NC, USA.
  4. Jessie P Buckley: Department of Epidemiology, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA; Department of Environmental Health and Engineering, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA. Electronic address: jessie.buckley@jhu.edu.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ultra-processed foods are highly processed foods which are manufactured with industrial substances to increase convenience and palatability. Some organophosphate esters (OPEs) are used as flame retardants and plasticizers and have been detected in food samples, particularly processed foods. However, little is known about dietary sources of OPEs or whether higher consumption of ultra-processed foods increases exposures.
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated whether higher consumption of ultra-processed food is associated with urinary OPE metabolite concentrations in a nationally representative sample of US children and adults.
METHODS: Among 2242 participants (≥6 years) in the National Health and Nutrition Examination Survey (NHANES) 2013-2014, we used the NOVA classification system to calculate percent of total energy from ultra-processed food using a 24 h dietary recall. Concentrations of 7 OPE metabolites, including diphenyl phosphate (DPHP), bis(1,3-dichloro-2-propyl) phosphate (BDCPP), bis(2-chloroethyl) phosphate (BCEP), dibutyl phosphate (DBUP), di-p-cresyl phosphate (DPCP), 2,3,4,5-tetrabromobenzoic acid (TBBA), and bis(1-chloro-2-propyl) phosphate (BCPP) were measured in urine. We used multivariable linear or logistic regressions to examine associations per 10% higher total energy from ultra-processed foods with percent changes or prevalence of detectable levels of creatinine-standardized OPEs.
RESULTS: In a model adjusting for only urinary creatinine, each 10% higher total energy from ultra-processed food was associated with 3.5% (95% CI: 0.7%, 6.3%) higher DPHP and 8.2% (95% CI: 4.6, 11.9%) higher BDCPP concentrations. However, none of the OPE metabolites was associated with ultra-processed food consumption in models adjusted for sociodemographic characteristics, health behaviors, and BMI (all p-values >0.05). Ultra-processed breads and tortillas; sauces, dressing, and gravies; and milk-based drinks were associated with higher concentrations of BDCPP while frozen and shelf-stable plate meals were associated with lower concentrations. Reconstituted meat or fish products and ultra-processed milk-based desserts were associated with greater odds of detectable levels of BCPP.
CONCLUSION: While some food groups were associated with urinary OPE metabolite concentrations, ultra-processed foods do not appear to be a major source of current OPE exposure in the US.

Keywords

References

  1. Environ Pollut. 2018 Feb;233:986-991 [PMID: 29037495]
  2. J Agric Food Chem. 2018 Dec 26;66(51):13525-13532 [PMID: 30525574]
  3. J Hazard Mater. 2016 Nov 15;318:686-693 [PMID: 27484948]
  4. Cell Metab. 2019 Jul 2;30(1):67-77.e3 [PMID: 31105044]
  5. J Nutr. 2006 Oct;136(10):2594-9 [PMID: 16988132]
  6. Food Chem Toxicol. 2017 Feb;100:1-7 [PMID: 27965106]
  7. Arch Toxicol. 1988;61(4):259-64 [PMID: 3377680]
  8. Environ Int. 2017 Jan;98:96-101 [PMID: 27745946]
  9. Appetite. 2017 Jan 1;108:512-520 [PMID: 27825941]
  10. Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Feb 20;52(4):2331-2338 [PMID: 29376341]
  11. BMJ. 2018 Feb 14;360:k322 [PMID: 29444771]
  12. Chemosphere. 2012 Aug;88(10):1119-53 [PMID: 22537891]
  13. Cad Saude Publica. 2010 Nov;26(11):2039-49 [PMID: 21180977]
  14. BMJ. 2019 May 29;365:l1451 [PMID: 31142457]
  15. Environ Int. 2019 Jun;127:35-51 [PMID: 30901640]
  16. Public Health Nutr. 2019 Apr;22(5):936-941 [PMID: 30744710]
  17. BMJ Open. 2016 Mar 09;6(3):e009892 [PMID: 26962035]
  18. Environ Int. 2019 Jul;128:343-352 [PMID: 31078003]
  19. Pediatrics. 2011 May;127(5):983-90 [PMID: 21518722]
  20. Environ Health Perspect. 2004 Dec;112(17):1691-6 [PMID: 15579415]
  21. BMJ. 2019 May 29;365:l1949 [PMID: 31142450]
  22. Appl Environ Microbiol. 1985 Aug;50(2):265-73 [PMID: 4051482]
  23. Environ Int. 2019 Oct;131:105057 [PMID: 31398592]
  24. Sci Total Environ. 2016 Jun 1;554-555:211-7 [PMID: 26950635]
  25. Chemosphere. 2017 Oct;185:918-925 [PMID: 28763939]
  26. Toxicol Lett. 2015 Jan 5;232(1):203-12 [PMID: 25448284]
  27. Epidemiology. 2016 May;27(3):449-58 [PMID: 26745610]
  28. Drug Metab Dispos. 1981 Sep-Oct;9(5):434-41 [PMID: 6117442]
  29. Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Oct;124(10):1521-1528 [PMID: 27072648]
  30. Environ Int. 2015 Feb;75:159-65 [PMID: 25461425]
  31. Environ Sci Technol. 2019 Feb 19;53(4):2151-2160 [PMID: 30652482]
  32. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 2011 Nov 1;256(3):281-9 [PMID: 21255595]
  33. Anal Bioanal Chem. 2017 Feb;409(5):1323-1332 [PMID: 27838756]
  34. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Aug;88(2):324-32 [PMID: 18689367]
  35. J Agric Food Chem. 2019 Nov 20;67(46):12652-12662 [PMID: 31246019]
  36. Environ Int. 2019 Oct;131:105056 [PMID: 31369981]
  37. Environ Sci Technol. 2018 Nov 6;52(21):12765-12773 [PMID: 30303374]
  38. Chemosphere. 2014 Dec;116:112-7 [PMID: 24703012]
  39. Environ Health. 2017 Apr 11;16(1):40 [PMID: 28399857]
  40. Environ Int. 2018 Jan;110:32-41 [PMID: 29102155]
  41. Public Health Nutr. 2019 Jul;22(10):1777-1785 [PMID: 30789115]
  42. Environ Health Perspect. 2016 Feb;124(2):220-7 [PMID: 26219104]
  43. Drug Metab Dispos. 1991 Mar-Apr;19(2):443-7 [PMID: 1676651]
  44. Public Health Nutr. 2018 Feb;21(3):497-501 [PMID: 29122052]
  45. Regul Toxicol Pharmacol. 2011 Apr;59(3):454-60 [PMID: 21295097]
  46. Toxicol Appl Pharmacol. 1983 Mar 15;67(3):357-69 [PMID: 6845365]

Grants

  1. K01 DK107782/NIDDK NIH HHS
  2. P30 DK072488/NIDDK NIH HHS
  3. R21 HL143089/NHLBI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Animals
Child
Diet
Female
Flame Retardants
Food Contamination
Humans
Nutrition Surveys
Organophosphates
Plasticizers

Chemicals

Flame Retardants
Organophosphates
Plasticizers

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0foodultra-processedhigherassociatedfoodsconcentrationsphosphateOPEconsumptionUltra-processedprocessedOPEsusedurinaryUStotalenergybisBDCPPorganophosphateestersretardantsHoweverdietarywhethermetaboliteNHANESpercentmetabolitesDPHP34BCPP10%detectablelevels95%CI:6milk-basedBACKGROUND:highlymanufacturedindustrialsubstancesincreaseconveniencepalatabilityflameplasticizersdetectedsamplesparticularlylittleknownsourcesincreasesexposuresOBJECTIVES:evaluatednationallyrepresentativesamplechildrenadultsMETHODS:Among2242participants≥6yearsNationalHealthNutritionExaminationSurvey2013-2014NOVAclassificationsystemcalculateusing24 hrecallConcentrations7includingdiphenyl13-dichloro-2-propyl2-chloroethylBCEPdibutylDBUPdi-p-cresylDPCP25-tetrabromobenzoicacidTBBA1-chloro-2-propylmeasuredurinemultivariablelinearlogisticregressionsexamineassociationsperchangesprevalencecreatinine-standardizedRESULTS:modeladjustingcreatinine5%07%3%82%119%nonemodelsadjustedsociodemographiccharacteristicshealthbehaviorsBMIp-values>005breadstortillassaucesdressinggraviesdrinksfrozenshelf-stableplatemealslowerReconstitutedmeatfishproductsdessertsgreateroddsCONCLUSION:groupsappearmajorsourcecurrentexposureUrinaryesterrelationgeneralpopulationFlameMinimallyOrganophosphate

Similar Articles

Cited By