Environmental variables driving species and genus level changes in annual plankton biomass.

Louise Forsblom, Jonna Engström-Öst, Sirpa Lehtinen, Inga Lips, Andreas Lindén
Author Information
  1. Louise Forsblom: ENVIRONMENTAL AND MARINE BIOLOGY, ÅBO AKADEMI UNIVERSITY, Artillerigatan 6, 20520 ÅBO, Finland. ORCID
  2. Jonna Engström-Öst: Bioeconomy team, NOVIA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES, Raseborgsvägen 9, 10600 EKENäS, Finland.
  3. Sirpa Lehtinen: Marine Research Laboratory, MARINE RESEARCH CENTRE, FINNISH ENVIRONMENT INSTITUTE, Agnes Sjöbergin Latu 2, 00790 HELSINKI, Finland.
  4. Inga Lips: DEPARTMENT OF MARINE SYSTEMS, TALLINN UNIVERSITY OF TECHNOLOGY, Akadeemia Rd. 15A, 12618 TALLINN, Estonia.
  5. Andreas Lindén: Bioeconomy team, NOVIA UNIVERSITY OF APPLIED SCIENCES, Raseborgsvägen 9, 10600 EKENäS, Finland.

Abstract

Abiotic variables subject to global change are known to affect plankton biomasses, and these effects can be species-specific. Here, we investigate the environmental drivers of annual biomass using plankton data from the Gulf of Finland in the northern Baltic Sea, spanning years 1993-2016. We estimated annual biomass time-series of 31 nanoplankton and microplankton species and genera from day-level data, accounting for the average phenology and wind. We found wind effects on day-level biomass in 16 taxa. We subsequently used state-space models to connect the annual biomass changes with potential environmental drivers (temperature, salinity, stratification, ice cover and inorganic nutrients), simultaneously accounting for temporal trends. We found clear environmental effects influencing the annual biomasses of , spp., , spp., spp. and and indicative effects in 10 additional taxa. These effects mostly concerned temperature, salinity or stratification. Together, these 16 taxa represent two-thirds of the summer biomass in the sampled community. The inter-annual variability observed in salinity and temperature is relatively low compared to scenarios of predicted change in these variables. Therefore, the potential impacts of the presented effects on plankton biomasses are considerable.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 12;8(6):e66475 [PMID: 23776676]
  2. Ecology. 2013 Sep;94(9):2097-107 [PMID: 24279280]
  3. Science. 2012 Nov 23;338(6110):1085-8 [PMID: 23112294]
  4. PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e21567 [PMID: 21747911]
  5. Nature. 2004 Aug 19;430(7002):881-4 [PMID: 15318219]
  6. Ambio. 2015 Jun;44 Suppl 3:345-56 [PMID: 26022318]
  7. Nat Rev Microbiol. 2018 Aug;16(8):471-483 [PMID: 29946124]
  8. Ecology. 2013 Dec;94(12):2663-9 [PMID: 24597213]
  9. Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2010 Oct 12;365(1555):3215-26 [PMID: 20819814]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0effectsbiomassannualplanktonvariablesbiomassesenvironmentaltaxatemperaturesalinitysppchangedriversdataspeciesday-levelaccountingwindfound16state-spacemodelschangespotentialstratificationAbioticsubjectglobalknownaffectcanspecies-specificinvestigateusingGulfFinlandnorthernBalticSeaspanningyears1993-2016estimatedtime-series31nanoplanktonmicroplanktongeneraaveragephenologysubsequentlyusedconnecticecoverinorganicnutrientssimultaneouslytemporaltrendsclearinfluencingindicative10additionalmostlyconcernedTogetherrepresenttwo-thirdssummersampledcommunityinter-annualvariabilityobservedrelativelylowcomparedscenariospredictedThereforeimpactspresentedconsiderableEnvironmentaldrivinggenusleveldensitydependencephytoplanktonpopulationdynamicssamplingbias

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)