From Klingon to Colbertian: Using Artificial Languages to Study Word Learning.

Sayuri Hayakawa, Siqi Ning, Viorica Marian
Author Information
  1. Sayuri Hayakawa: Northwestern University.
  2. Siqi Ning: Northwestern University.
  3. Viorica Marian: Northwestern University.

Abstract

Vocabulary acquisition is a critical part of learning a new language. Yet, due to structural, historical, and individual variability associated with natural languages, isolating the impact of specific factors on word learning can be challenging. Artificial languages are versatile tools for addressing this problem, allowing researchers to systematically manipulate properties of the language and control for learners' past experiences. Here, we review how artificial languages have been used to study bilingual word learning, with a particular focus on the influences of language input (e.g., word properties) and language experience (e.g., bilingualism). We additionally discuss the advantages and limitations of artificial languages for bilingual research and suggest resources for researchers considering the use of artificial languages. Used and interpreted properly, artificial language studies can inform our understanding of a wide range of factors relevant to word learning.

Keywords

References

  1. Behav Res Methods. 2009 Nov;41(4):977-90 [PMID: 19897807]
  2. Front Psychol. 2011 Nov 25;2:324 [PMID: 22131981]
  3. Cogn Sci. 2012 Aug;36(6):1129-47 [PMID: 22462514]
  4. Lang Cogn Process. 2014;29(7):771-780 [PMID: 25018577]
  5. Psychon Bull Rev. 2009 Aug;16(4):705-10 [PMID: 19648456]
  6. PLoS One. 2012;7(8):e43230 [PMID: 22916227]
  7. PLoS One. 2010 Jun 02;5(6):e10729 [PMID: 20532192]
  8. J Mem Lang. 2014 Oct;76:237-252 [PMID: 29129958]
  9. Lang Speech Hear Serv Sch. 2001 Oct 1;32(4):212-224 [PMID: 27764448]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2002 Jan 8;99(1):529-34 [PMID: 11773629]
  11. Dev Sci. 2009 Sep;12(5):815-23 [PMID: 19702772]
  12. Front Psychol. 2012 May 25;3:155 [PMID: 22654777]
  13. Cogn Sci. 2016 May;40(4):822-47 [PMID: 26201508]
  14. Exp Psychol. 2011;58(5):412-24 [PMID: 21768069]
  15. Front Psychol. 2011 Sep 13;2:210 [PMID: 21949512]
  16. Lang Learn Dev. 2009;5(1):30-49 [PMID: 24729760]
  17. J Cogn Neurosci. 2012 Apr;24(4):933-47 [PMID: 21861686]
  18. Writ Lang Lit. 2017;20(1):7-27 [PMID: 28839451]
  19. J Child Lang. 1997 Feb;24(1):3-24 [PMID: 9154006]
  20. Lang Learn. 2010 Mar;60(1):154-193 [PMID: 21359123]
  21. Psychon Bull Rev. 2018 Jun;25(3):892-916 [PMID: 28547538]
  22. Cogn Psychol. 1988 Apr;20(2):121-57 [PMID: 3365937]
  23. Appl Psycholinguist. 2017 Mar;38(2):427-456 [PMID: 28781397]
  24. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2009 May;35(3):829-35 [PMID: 19379054]

Grants

  1. R01 HD059858/NICHD NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0languageslearninglanguagewordartificialacquisitionfactorscanArtificialresearcherspropertiesbilingualegbilingualismVocabularycriticalpartnewYetduestructuralhistoricalindividualvariabilityassociatednaturalisolatingimpactspecificchallengingversatiletoolsaddressingproblemallowingsystematicallymanipulatecontrollearners'pastexperiencesreviewusedstudyparticularfocusinfluencesinputexperienceadditionallydiscussadvantageslimitationsresearchsuggestresourcesconsideringuseUsedinterpretedproperlystudiesinformunderstandingwiderangerelevantKlingonColbertian:UsingLanguagesStudyWordLearningvocabulary

Similar Articles

Cited By (2)