Evidence-based medicine self-assessment, knowledge, and integration into daily practice: a survey among Romanian physicians and comparison between trainees and specialists.

Roxana-Denisa Capraş, Adriana Elena Bulboacă, Sorana D Bolboacă
Author Information
  1. Roxana-Denisa Capraş: Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  2. Adriana Elena Bulboacă: Department of Pathophysiology, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania.
  3. Sorana D Bolboacă: Department of Medical Informatics and Biostatistics, Faculty of Medicine, "Iuliu Hațieganu" University of Medicine and Pharmacy, Cluj-Napoca, Romania. sbolboaca@umfcluj.ro. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A gap between the attitude towards evidence-based medicine (EBM), knowledge and awareness has been reported among physicians from different parts of the world. However, no investigation on Romanian physicians is available in the scientific literature. Our study aimed, firstly, to assess EBM awareness and the knowledge used by Romanian physicians, and, secondly, to compare resident trainees with specialists.
METHODS: Romanian trainee and specialist physicians were invited to participate in this cross-sectional study. The study tool was an online questionnaire designed to explore their awareness, knowledge, usefulness, the attitude in medical documentation, and the use of professional EBM resources. Data were collected by Google Form from January 1st to April 30th, 2017, respecting the responders' anonymity. Two groups of physicians were investigated as trainees and specialists, respectively. Descriptive statistics (number, percentage, median and interquartile range) was used to describe the survey-related variables. Statistical significance on qualitative data was calculated with the Chi-square test, Fisher's exact test, or the Z-test for proportions.
RESULTS: Two hundred and 50 physicians participated in this study (68% trainees vs. 32% specialists). In both groups, a significantly high percentage was represented by women as compared to men (trainees 72.4%, specialists 70%). The correct definition of EBM was identified by most respondents (75.6%). Affirmatively, both trainees and specialists always looked at levels of evidence when reading scientific literature, but a small percentage (6.5% trainees and 3% specialists) adequately identified the uppermost types of evidence in the hierarchy. Almost a quarter of the respondents shared the name of mobile EBM resources that they used to support the daily practice. Only six out of the 49 listed mobile resources met the EBM criteria.
CONCLUSIONS: The participants proved to have limited knowledge of EBM and a positive attitude towards the concept. They made use of mobile medical resources without understanding which of these were evidence-based.

Keywords

References

  1. PLoS One. 2009 Nov 13;4(11):e7828 [PMID: 19915708]
  2. JAMA. 1992 Nov 4;268(17):2420-5 [PMID: 1404801]
  3. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2007 Mar-Apr;102(2):155-60 [PMID: 17615916]
  4. CMAJ. 2004 Apr 27;170(9):1385-6 [PMID: 15111465]
  5. BMC Med Ethics. 2015 Oct 12;16(1):69 [PMID: 26459219]
  6. J Eval Clin Pract. 2009 Dec;15(6):1131-6 [PMID: 20367716]
  7. Saudi Pharm J. 2014 Jul;22(3):207-12 [PMID: 25061405]
  8. PLoS One. 2019 Jun 13;14(6):e0217918 [PMID: 31194762]
  9. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2012 Apr 17;59(16):1488-9 [PMID: 22497830]
  10. Surv Ophthalmol. 2019 Sep 18;:null [PMID: 31541618]
  11. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol. 2016 Nov;37(11):1272-1277 [PMID: 27514583]
  12. JAMA. 2007 Sep 5;298(9):1071-7 [PMID: 17785656]
  13. Fam Med. 2014 Sep;46(8):626-30 [PMID: 25163042]
  14. Eur J Radiol. 2013 May;82(5):829-36 [PMID: 23312700]
  15. J Anaesthesiol Clin Pharmacol. 2017 Oct-Dec;33(4):487-492 [PMID: 29416241]
  16. J Med Internet Res. 2016 May 16;18(5):e97 [PMID: 27185295]
  17. Arch Dermatol Res. 2018 Nov;310(9):675-689 [PMID: 30250964]
  18. Health Informatics J. 2013 Mar;19(1):16-28 [PMID: 23486823]
  19. East Mediterr Health J. 2019 Mar 19;25(2):82-89 [PMID: 30942471]
  20. BMJ. 1996 Jan 13;312(7023):71-2 [PMID: 8555924]
  21. BMJ. 2008 Apr 26;336(7650):924-6 [PMID: 18436948]
  22. J Telemed Telecare. 2016 Dec;22(8):472-477 [PMID: 27799450]
  23. ScientificWorldJournal. 2010 May 18;10:865-78 [PMID: 20495766]
  24. P T. 2014 May;39(5):356-64 [PMID: 24883008]
  25. BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2019 Jun 3;19(1):107 [PMID: 31159784]
  26. J Clin Epidemiol. 2016 May;73:82-6 [PMID: 26934549]
  27. J Infect Public Health. 2016 Nov - Dec;9(6):691-697 [PMID: 27666637]
  28. Chirurgia (Bucur). 2007 Sep-Oct;102(5):527-30 [PMID: 18018351]
  29. BMJ Open. 2019 Mar 30;9(3):e025224 [PMID: 30928940]
  30. BMC Fam Pract. 2009 Sep 09;10:64 [PMID: 19740436]
  31. BMC Med Educ. 2016 Jun 29;16:166 [PMID: 27357211]
  32. Int J Health Sci (Qassim). 2018 Mar-Apr;12(2):9-15 [PMID: 29599688]
  33. ANZ J Surg. 2007 Apr;77(4):231-6 [PMID: 17388824]
  34. Glob Health Action. 2017 Jun;10(sup3):1332259 [PMID: 28838306]
  35. BMC Res Notes. 2011 Sep 28;4:374 [PMID: 21955346]
  36. Evid Based Med. 2016 Aug;21(4):125-7 [PMID: 27339128]

Grants

  1. 5200/16/01.03.2017/Iuliu Hațieganu University of Medicine and Pharmacy

MeSH Term

Adult
Attitude of Health Personnel
Awareness
Cross-Sectional Studies
Evidence-Based Medicine
Female
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Internship and Residency
Male
Middle Aged
Mobile Applications
Physicians
Romania
Self-Assessment
Smartphone
Specialization
Surveys and Questionnaires
Young Adult

Word Cloud

Similar Articles

Cited By