Transient amplifiers of selection and reducers of fixation for death-Birth updating on graphs.

Benjamin Allen, Christine Sample, Robert Jencks, James Withers, Patricia Steinhagen, Lori Brizuela, Joshua Kolodny, Darren Parke, Gabor Lippner, Yulia A Dementieva
Author Information
  1. Benjamin Allen: Department of Mathematics, Emmanuel College, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America. ORCID
  2. Christine Sample: Department of Mathematics, Emmanuel College, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America. ORCID
  3. Robert Jencks: Department of Mathematics, Emmanuel College, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  4. James Withers: Department of Mathematics, Emmanuel College, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  5. Patricia Steinhagen: Department of Mathematics, Emmanuel College, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  6. Lori Brizuela: Department of Mathematics, Emmanuel College, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  7. Joshua Kolodny: Department of Mathematics, Emmanuel College, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America. ORCID
  8. Darren Parke: Department of Mathematics, Emmanuel College, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  9. Gabor Lippner: Department of Mathematics, Northeastern University, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.
  10. Yulia A Dementieva: Department of Mathematics, Emmanuel College, Boston, Massachusetts, United States of America.

Abstract

The spatial structure of an evolving population affects the balance of natural selection versus genetic drift. Some structures amplify selection, increasing the role that fitness differences play in determining which mutations become fixed. Other structures suppress selection, reducing the effect of fitness differences and increasing the role of random chance. This phenomenon can be modeled by representing spatial structure as a graph, with individuals occupying vertices. Births and deaths occur stochastically, according to a specified update rule. We study death-Birth updating: An individual is chosen to die and then its neighbors compete to reproduce into the vacant spot. Previous numerical experiments suggested that amplifiers of selection for this process are either rare or nonexistent. We introduce a perturbative method for this problem for weak selection regime, meaning that mutations have small fitness effects. We show that fixation probability under weak selection can be calculated in terms of the coalescence times of random walks. This result leads naturally to a new definition of effective population size. Using this and other methods, we uncover the first known examples of transient amplifiers of selection (graphs that amplify selection for a particular range of fitness values) for the death-Birth process. We also exhibit new families of "reducers of fixation", which decrease the fixation probability of all mutations, whether beneficial or deleterious.

References

  1. Genetics. 2012 Sep;192(1):15-31 [PMID: 22964835]
  2. PLoS Comput Biol. 2020 Jan 17;16(1):e1007494 [PMID: 31951609]
  3. J Math Biol. 2019 Mar;78(4):1147-1210 [PMID: 30430219]
  4. Science. 1999 Oct 15;286(5439):509-12 [PMID: 10521342]
  5. PLoS Comput Biol. 2016 Aug 11;12(8):e1005059 [PMID: 27513946]
  6. Nature. 2004 Apr 8;428(6983):643-6 [PMID: 15074318]
  7. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Feb 26;11(2):e1004108 [PMID: 25719560]
  8. Nature. 2007 May 24;447(7143):469-72 [PMID: 17522682]
  9. R Soc Open Sci. 2015 Apr 29;2(4):140465 [PMID: 26064637]
  10. Science. 2013 Nov 22;342(6161):995-8 [PMID: 24264992]
  11. Am Nat. 2013 Jun;181(6):E139-63 [PMID: 23669549]
  12. Biosystems. 2012 Feb;107(2):66-80 [PMID: 22020107]
  13. PLoS Comput Biol. 2015 Nov 06;11(11):e1004437 [PMID: 26544962]
  14. Nature. 2006 May 25;441(7092):502-5 [PMID: 16724065]
  15. PLoS One. 2017 Jul 10;12(7):e0180549 [PMID: 28700698]
  16. Nat Commun. 2014 Mar 06;5:3409 [PMID: 24598979]
  17. Nature. 2017 Apr 13;544(7649):227-230 [PMID: 28355181]
  18. Genetics. 1931 Mar;16(2):97-159 [PMID: 17246615]
  19. Proc Biol Sci. 2013 May 15;280(1762):20130211 [PMID: 23677339]
  20. Nature. 2005 Jan 20;433(7023):312-6 [PMID: 15662424]
  21. PLoS One. 2018 Nov 26;13(11):e0200670 [PMID: 30475815]
  22. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2013 Dec;88(6):062801 [PMID: 24483505]
  23. Genet Res. 1991 Oct;58(2):167-75 [PMID: 1765264]
  24. Science. 2013 Nov 22;342(6161):938-9 [PMID: 24264980]
  25. Genetics. 1962 Jun;47:713-9 [PMID: 14456043]
  26. Genetics. 1971 Aug;68(4):581-97 [PMID: 5166069]
  27. Biosystems. 2016 Dec;150:87-91 [PMID: 27555086]
  28. Commun Biol. 2018 Jun 14;1:71 [PMID: 30271952]
  29. Nat Commun. 2019 Nov 8;10(1):5107 [PMID: 31704922]
  30. Commun Biol. 2019 Apr 23;2:137 [PMID: 31044162]
  31. Evolution. 1988 May;42(3):482-495 [PMID: 28564013]
  32. Nat Hum Behav. 2018 Jul;2(7):492-499 [PMID: 31097804]
  33. Phys Rev E. 2019 Jul;100(1-1):012408 [PMID: 31499887]
  34. Biol Direct. 2016 Aug 23;11:41 [PMID: 27549612]
  35. Nature. 2004 Apr 8;428(6983):646-50 [PMID: 15071593]
  36. Evolution. 2012 May;66(5):1613-23 [PMID: 22519794]
  37. J R Soc Interface. 2014 Oct 6;11(99):null [PMID: 25142521]
  38. PLoS Comput Biol. 2018 Nov 12;14(11):e1006559 [PMID: 30419017]
  39. J Theor Biol. 2018 Aug 14;451:10-18 [PMID: 29727631]
  40. J Math Biol. 2017 Nov;75(5):1285-1317 [PMID: 28352964]
  41. PLoS Comput Biol. 2017 Nov 27;13(11):e1005864 [PMID: 29176825]
  42. J R Soc Interface. 2019 Mar 29;16(152):20180677 [PMID: 30862280]
  43. Biosystems. 2015 Mar;129:25-35 [PMID: 25625871]
  44. Phys Rev Lett. 2006 May 12;96(18):188104 [PMID: 16712402]
  45. J Theor Biol. 2015 Oct 7;382:44-56 [PMID: 26122591]
  46. Phys Rev E Stat Nonlin Soft Matter Phys. 2015 Oct;92(4):042707 [PMID: 26565272]
  47. Sci Rep. 2017 Dec;7(1):82 [PMID: 28250441]
  48. Commun Biol. 2019 Apr 23;2:138 [PMID: 31044163]

MeSH Term

Computational Biology
Genetic Drift
Models, Biological
Models, Statistical
Mutation
Population Dynamics
Selection, Genetic

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0selectionfitnessmutationsdeath-BirthamplifiersfixationspatialstructurepopulationstructuresamplifyincreasingroledifferencesrandomcanprocessweakprobabilitynewgraphsevolvingaffectsbalancenaturalversusgeneticdriftplaydeterminingbecomefixedsuppressreducingeffectchancephenomenonmodeledrepresentinggraphindividualsoccupyingverticesBirthsdeathsoccurstochasticallyaccordingspecifiedupdaterulestudyupdating:individualchosendieneighborscompetereproducevacantspotPreviousnumericalexperimentssuggestedeitherrarenonexistentintroduceperturbativemethodproblemregimemeaningsmalleffectsshowcalculatedtermscoalescencetimeswalksresultleadsnaturallydefinitioneffectivesizeUsingmethodsuncoverfirstknownexamplestransientparticularrangevaluesalsoexhibitfamilies"reducersfixation"decreasewhetherbeneficialdeleteriousTransientreducersupdating

Similar Articles

Cited By (15)