"Navigation to prioritizing the patient" - first-line nurse managers' experiences of participating in a quality improvement collaborative.

Berit Mosseng Sjølie, Trude Anita Hartviksen, Terese Bondas
Author Information
  1. Berit Mosseng Sjølie: Nord University, Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Storgata 105, N-8370, Leknes, Norway. berit.m.sjolie@nord.no. ORCID
  2. Trude Anita Hartviksen: Nord University, Faculty of Nursing and Health Sciences, Storgata 105, N-8370, Leknes, Norway.
  3. Terese Bondas: University of Stavanger, Faculty of Health Sciences, P.O. Box 8600, Forus, N-4036, Stavanger, Norway.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: First-line nurse managers are central to quality improvement work when changing work practices into better patient outcomes. Quality improvement collaboratives have been adopted widely to support quality management in healthcare services and shared learning. We have little knowledge of the first-line nurse managers' own perspectives concerning their need for support and knowledge in quality improvement work. Therefore, the aim of this study was to gain understanding of first line nurse managers' experiences in leading quality improvement work in their own organization when participating in a quality improvement collaborative.
METHODS: An interpretive approach was chosen following Graneheim and Lundman's qualitative content analysis. Data was collected through three focus group interviews with first-line nurse managers representing different workplaces: the local hospital, a nursing home, and a homecare service in a rural area of Norway.
RESULTS: "Navigation to prioritizing the patient" emerged as an overarching metaphor to describe the first-line nurse managers experiences of leading quality improvement work, based on three themes: 1) fellowship for critical thinking and prioritizing the patient; 2) mastering the processes in quality improvement work; and 3) the everyday reality of leadership as a complex context.
CONCLUSIONS: A quality improvement collaborative encompassing knowledge transfer and reflection may create an important fellowship for health care leaders, encouraging and enabling quality improvement work in their own organization. It is crucial to invite all leaders from an organization to be able to share the experience and continue their collaboration with their staff in the organization. Continuity over time, following up elements of the quality improvement work at joint meetings, involvement by users, and self-development of and voluntary involvement in the quality improvement collaborative seem to be important for knowledge development in quality improvement. The supportive elements of the quality improvement collaborative fellowship were crucial to critical thinking and to the first-line nurse managers' own development and security in mastering the quality improvement work processes. They preferred prioritizing the patients in quality improvement work, despite haste and obstructive situations in an everyday context.

Keywords

References

  1. Int J Health Policy Manag. 2018 Sep 01;7(12):1073-1084 [PMID: 30709082]
  2. J Nurs Manag. 2018 Mar;26(2):192-199 [PMID: 28913924]
  3. Qual Saf Health Care. 2002 Dec;11(4):345-51 [PMID: 12468695]
  4. Br J Hosp Med (Lond). 2015 Apr;76(4):239-43 [PMID: 25853356]
  5. J Nurs Educ. 2011 Jun;50(6):322-7 [PMID: 21634326]
  6. BMC Health Serv Res. 2019 Aug 5;19(1):546 [PMID: 31382974]
  7. J Nurs Manag. 2010 May;18(4):477-86 [PMID: 20609052]
  8. Nurs Adm Q. 2018 Jul/Sep;42(3):269-277 [PMID: 29870493]
  9. Nurs Forum. 2010 Apr-Jun;45(2):108-17 [PMID: 20536759]
  10. Adv Health Care Manag. 2013;14:3-34 [PMID: 24772881]
  11. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2011;24(2):101-23 [PMID: 21456487]
  12. Res Nurs Health. 2019 Apr;42(2):136-147 [PMID: 30807664]
  13. J Nurs Manag. 2006 Nov;14(8):601-9 [PMID: 17054733]
  14. BMJ Qual Saf. 2018 Mar;27(3):226-240 [PMID: 29055899]
  15. Int J Health Care Qual Assur. 2017 Jun 12;30(5):410-423 [PMID: 28574326]
  16. Leadersh Health Serv (Bradf Engl). 2007;20(2):85-96 [PMID: 20690468]
  17. BMJ Open. 2018 Apr 7;8(4):e020930 [PMID: 29627818]
  18. BMC Health Serv Res. 2018 Jun 8;18(1):433 [PMID: 29884174]
  19. Nurs Adm Q. 2003 Jul-Sep;27(3):249-53 [PMID: 13677190]
  20. Nurse Educ Today. 2004 Feb;24(2):105-12 [PMID: 14769454]
  21. Int J Nurs Stud. 2018 Sep;85:19-60 [PMID: 29807190]
  22. Int J Qual Health Care. 2018 Apr 20;30(suppl_1):20-23 [PMID: 29878138]

MeSH Term

Adult
Aged
Female
Health Priorities
Humans
Leadership
Male
Middle Aged
Norway
Nurse Administrators
Patient Navigation
Qualitative Research
Quality Improvement

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0improvementqualityworknursecollaborativefirst-lineknowledgemanagers'organizationprioritizingmanagersQualityexperiencesfellowshipleadershipFirst-linepatientoutcomessupportleadingparticipatingfollowinganalysisthreenursing"Navigationpatient"criticalthinkingmasteringprocesseseverydaycontextimportantleaderscrucialelementsinvolvementdevelopmentBACKGROUND:centralchangingpracticesbettercollaborativesadoptedwidelymanagementhealthcareservicessharedlearninglittleperspectivesconcerningneedThereforeaimstudygainunderstandingfirstlineMETHODS:interpretiveapproachchosenGraneheimLundman'squalitativecontentDatacollectedfocusgroupinterviewsrepresentingdifferentworkplaces:localhospitalhomehomecareserviceruralareaNorwayRESULTS:emergedoverarchingmetaphordescribebasedthemes:123realitycomplexCONCLUSIONS:encompassingtransferreflectionmaycreatehealthcareencouragingenablinginviteableshareexperiencecontinuecollaborationstaffContinuitytimejointmeetingsusersself-developmentvoluntaryseemsupportivesecuritypreferredpatientsdespitehasteobstructivesituations-Bondas’theoryContentmanagerNetworkNursingPatient

Similar Articles

Cited By