Content and outcomes of narrative medicine programmes: a systematic review of the literature through 2019.

Christy DiFrances Remein, Ellen Childs, John Carlo Pasco, Ludovic Trinquart, David B Flynn, Sarah L Wingerter, Robina M Bhasin, Lindsay B Demers, Emelia J Benjamin
Author Information
  1. Christy DiFrances Remein: Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA. ORCID
  2. Ellen Childs: Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA echilds@bu.edu.
  3. John Carlo Pasco: Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  4. Ludovic Trinquart: Boston University School of Public Health, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  5. David B Flynn: Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  6. Sarah L Wingerter: Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  7. Robina M Bhasin: Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  8. Lindsay B Demers: Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.
  9. Emelia J Benjamin: Boston University School of Medicine, Boston, Massachusetts, USA.

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Narrative medicine (NM) incorporates stories into health sciences paradigms as fundamental aspects of the human experience. The aim of this systematic review is to answer the research question: how effective is the implementation and evaluation of NM programmes in academic medicine and health sciences? We documented objectives, content and evaluation outcomes of NM programming to provide recommendations for future narrative-based education.
METHODS: We conducted a systematic review of literature published through 2019 using five major databases: PubMed, Embase, PsycINFO, ERIC and MedEdPORTAL. Eligible NM programming included textual analysis/close reading of published literature and creative/reflective writing. Qualifying participants comprised individuals from academic medicine and health sciences disciplines. We reviewed and categorised programme goals, content and evaluation activities to assess participant satisfaction and programme efficacy. Two members of the research team assessed the risk of bias, independently screening records via a two-round, iterative process to reach consensus on eligibility.
RESULTS: Of 1569 original citations identified, we selected 55 unique programmes (described in 61 records). In all, 41 (75%) programmes reported a form of evaluation; evaluation methods lacked consistency. Twenty-two programmes used quantitative evaluation (13 well described), and 33 programmes used qualitative evaluation (27 well described). Well-described quantitative evaluations relied on 32 different measures (7 validated) and showed evidence of high participant satisfaction and pre-post improvement in competencies such as relationship-building, empathy, confidence/personal accomplishment, pedagogical skills and clinical skills. An average of 88.3% of participants agreed or strongly agreed that the programme had positive outcomes. Qualitative evaluation identified high participant satisfaction and improvement in competencies such as relationship-building, empathy, perspective-taking/reflection, resilience and burnout detection/mitigation, confidence/personal accomplishment, narrative competence, and ethical inquiry.
CONCLUSION: Evaluation suggests that NM programming leads to high participant satisfaction and positive outcomes across various competencies. We suggest best practices and innovative future directions for programme implementation and evaluation.

Keywords

References

  1. Fam Med. 2016 Apr;48(4):300-4 [PMID: 27057609]
  2. Isis. 2015 Jun;106(2):341-52 [PMID: 26353439]
  3. PLoS Med. 2009 Jul 21;6(7):e1000097 [PMID: 19621072]
  4. Acad Med. 2014 Feb;89(2):335-42 [PMID: 24362390]
  5. Med Humanit. 2016 Dec;42(4):246-251 [PMID: 27885036]
  6. Acad Med. 2012 Mar;87(3):334-41 [PMID: 22373629]
  7. Mayo Clin Proc. 2015 Dec;90(12):1600-13 [PMID: 26653297]
  8. J Med Humanit. 2018 Sep;39(3):275-283 [PMID: 28062944]
  9. Ann Intern Med. 1995 Apr 15;122(8):599-606 [PMID: 7887555]
  10. MedEdPORTAL. 2016 Nov 03;12:10493 [PMID: 30984835]
  11. Acad Med. 2004 Apr;79(4):351-6 [PMID: 15044169]
  12. J Interprof Care. 2010 Jul;24(4):401-11 [PMID: 20540615]
  13. J Natl Med Assoc. 2011 Sep-Oct;103(9-10):811-5 [PMID: 22364047]
  14. J Nurs Manag. 2018 Oct;26(7):810-819 [PMID: 30129106]
  15. Dev World Bioeth. 2014 Apr;14(1):47-55 [PMID: 23279367]
  16. J Gen Intern Med. 2004 Jan;19(1):64-8 [PMID: 14748862]
  17. Acad Psychiatry. 2010 Nov-Dec;34(6):438-41 [PMID: 21041467]
  18. Acad Med. 2006 Oct;81(10 Suppl):S128-37 [PMID: 17001123]
  19. Acad Med. 2010 Nov;85(11):1669-71 [PMID: 20980850]
  20. Patient Educ Couns. 2019 Mar;102(3):536-541 [PMID: 30385101]
  21. Perspect Med Educ. 2019 Feb;8(1):52-59 [PMID: 30721400]
  22. J Adv Med Educ Prof. 2017 Apr;5(2):73-77 [PMID: 28367463]
  23. Neurology. 2019 Feb 19;92(8):e879-e883 [PMID: 30777919]
  24. Med Humanit. 2017 Sep;43(3):199-203 [PMID: 28385880]
  25. Med Teach. 2016 May;38(5):525-8 [PMID: 27027210]
  26. Bull Hist Med. 2003 Fall;77(3):536-75 [PMID: 14523260]
  27. Acad Med. 2018 Jun;93(6):888-894 [PMID: 29261540]
  28. JAMA. 2018 Apr 17;319(15):1532-1534 [PMID: 29677282]
  29. Med Educ. 2016 May;50(5):581-2 [PMID: 27072469]
  30. BMC Med Educ. 2017 Jul 5;17(1):108 [PMID: 28679379]
  31. Virtual Mentor. 2007 Aug 01;9(8):543-6 [PMID: 23218147]
  32. J Grad Med Educ. 2014 Jun;6(2):355-6 [PMID: 24949151]
  33. Med Teach. 2008;30(8):e280-5 [PMID: 18946816]
  34. Ann Intern Med. 2001 Jan 2;134(1):83-7 [PMID: 11187429]
  35. J Grad Med Educ. 2010 Dec;2(4):610-5 [PMID: 22132287]
  36. Med Teach. 2012;34(12):e813-9 [PMID: 22934589]
  37. Rev Med Chil. 2012 May;140(5):659-66 [PMID: 23096674]
  38. Teach Learn Med. 2012;24(3):242-7 [PMID: 22775789]
  39. J Med Humanit. 2013 Dec;34(4):415-28 [PMID: 23996053]
  40. Clin Teach. 2013 Aug;10(4):242-5 [PMID: 23834570]
  41. JAMA. 2001 Oct 17;286(15):1897-902 [PMID: 11597295]
  42. Acad Med. 2018 Aug;93(8):1105-1106 [PMID: 29443717]
  43. Gates Open Res. 2018 Jun 11;2:4 [PMID: 29984356]
  44. J Cancer Educ. 2019 Dec;34(6):1198-1203 [PMID: 30219971]
  45. Healthcare (Basel). 2017 Sep 12;5(3): [PMID: 28895903]
  46. Acta Med Port. 2016 Dec 30;29(12):790-792 [PMID: 28425880]
  47. J Int Med Res. 2018 Aug;46(8):3306-3317 [PMID: 29976109]
  48. JCO Oncol Pract. 2020 Apr;16(4):e384-e394 [PMID: 32101489]
  49. Acad Med. 1995 Sep;70(9):787-94 [PMID: 7669155]
  50. BMC Med Educ. 2014 Sep 04;14:183 [PMID: 25189761]
  51. J Eval Clin Pract. 2008 Oct;14(5):732-41 [PMID: 19018904]
  52. Acad Med. 2017 Dec;92(12):1665-1667 [PMID: 29019798]
  53. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2019 Oct;58(4):696-706 [PMID: 31216430]
  54. Med Educ. 2012 Nov;46(11):1112-3 [PMID: 23078701]
  55. Qual Health Res. 1998 May;8(3):352-61 [PMID: 10558336]
  56. J Med Humanit. 2015 Dec;36(4):269-89 [PMID: 26179365]
  57. Health Commun. 2020 Feb;35(2):257-261 [PMID: 30514123]
  58. J Gen Intern Med. 2015 Jul;30(7):1025-8 [PMID: 25670397]
  59. J Educ Eval Health Prof. 2014 Aug 16;11:20 [PMID: 25112448]
  60. Presse Med. 2013 Jan;42(1):e1-8 [PMID: 23183164]
  61. Teach Learn Med. 2006 Winter;18(1):14-7 [PMID: 16354134]
  62. Virtual Mentor. 2006 May 01;8(5):315-8 [PMID: 23232425]
  63. mBio. 2017 Dec 19;8(6): [PMID: 29259084]
  64. J Pediatr Nurs. 2018 Sep - Oct;42:e2-e9 [PMID: 30007769]
  65. BMJ Open. 2016 Jul 14;6(7):e011220 [PMID: 27417197]
  66. Acad Med. 2016 Jun;91(6):772-7 [PMID: 26796087]
  67. Perspect Med Educ. 2012 Aug;1(3):143-54 [PMID: 23316470]
  68. Perm J. 2018 Apr 18;22: [PMID: 29702059]
  69. J Palliat Care. 2020 Apr;35(2):127-132 [PMID: 31354038]
  70. Teach Learn Med. 2009 Jul;21(3):248-53 [PMID: 20183346]
  71. JAMA. 2019 Oct 1;322(13):1238-1239 [PMID: 31573618]
  72. Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Oct;128 Suppl 1:27S-33S [PMID: 27662003]
  73. Med Teach. 2019 Jul;41(7):802-810 [PMID: 30983460]
  74. Acad Radiol. 2015 Apr;22(4):534-8 [PMID: 25636974]
  75. Patient Educ Couns. 2013 Jun;91(3):280-6 [PMID: 23462070]

Grants

  1. P50 HL120163/NHLBI NIH HHS
  2. R01 HL141434/NHLBI NIH HHS
  3. R01 HL092577/NHLBI NIH HHS
  4. R01 HL126136/NHLBI NIH HHS
  5. U54 HL120163/NHLBI NIH HHS
  6. R01 HL128914/NHLBI NIH HHS

MeSH Term

Curriculum
Education, Medical
Health Personnel
Humans
Narrative Medicine
Professional Competence
Program Evaluation
Research

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0evaluationNMprogrammesmedicineoutcomeseducationprogrammeparticipantsatisfactionhealthsystematicreviewprogrammingliteraturedescribedhighcompetenciestrainingmedicalsciencesresearchimplementationacademiccontentfuturepublished2019participantsrecordsidentifiedusedquantitativewellimprovementrelationship-buildingempathyconfidence/personalaccomplishmentskillsagreedpositivenarrativeOBJECTIVES:Narrativeincorporatesstoriesparadigmsfundamentalaspectshumanexperienceaimanswerquestion:effectivesciences?documentedobjectivesproviderecommendationsnarrative-basedMETHODS:conductedusingfivemajordatabases:PubMedEmbasePsycINFOERICMedEdPORTALEligibleincludedtextualanalysis/closereadingcreative/reflectivewritingQualifyingcomprisedindividualsdisciplinesreviewedcategorisedgoalsactivitiesassessefficacyTwomembersteamassessedriskbiasindependentlyscreeningviatwo-rounditerativeprocessreachconsensuseligibilityRESULTS:1569originalcitationsselected55unique614175%reportedformmethodslackedconsistencyTwenty-two1333qualitative27Well-describedevaluationsrelied32differentmeasures7validatedshowedevidencepre-postpedagogicalclinicalaverage883%stronglyQualitativeperspective-taking/reflectionresilienceburnoutdetection/mitigationcompetenceethicalinquiryCONCLUSION:EvaluationsuggestsleadsacrossvarioussuggestbestpracticesinnovativedirectionsContentprogrammes:see&ethics

Similar Articles

Cited By