Improving the dietary quality of food parcels leads to improved dietary intake in Dutch food bank recipients-effects of a randomized controlled trial.

Judith E Neter, S Coosje Dijkstra, Jos W R Twisk, Marjolein Visser, Ingeborg A Brouwer
Author Information
  1. Judith E Neter: Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands. judith.neter@vu.nl. ORCID
  2. S Coosje Dijkstra: Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  3. Jos W R Twisk: Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Amsterdam UMC, Location VU University Medical Center, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  4. Marjolein Visser: Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  5. Ingeborg A Brouwer: Department of Health Sciences, Faculty of Science, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, De Boelelaan 1085, 1081 HV, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

Abstract

PURPOSE: Since food banks have a strong influence on recipients' diets, and seem to have difficulties in supporting healthy diets, improving the dietary quality of food parcels is important. The aim of our study was to assess whether improving the dietary quality of food parcels, using different strategies, can positively impact the actual dietary intake of Dutch food bank recipients.
METHODS: This randomized cross-over controlled trial (Trial ID: ISRCTN40554133) with four intervention conditions [(1) Control (standard food parcel), (2) snacks (standard food parcel with replacement of unhealthy snacks by staple foods), (3) FV (standard food parcel plus the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables), (4) snacks + FV (standard food parcel with replacement of unhealthy snacks by staple foods plus the recommended daily amount of fruit and vegetables)] included 163 food bank recipients, from three food banks. At baseline, participants filled in a questionnaire. Dietary intake data were collected through 24-h recalls after both intervention conditions at 4 and 8 weeks follow-up. Primary outcome was daily fruit and vegetable intake, secondary outcomes were daily dietary intakes of food groups and nutrients.
RESULTS: Multi-level linear regression analysis, using a two-level model, showed a higher mean daily fruit intake in participants in the FV condition than in participants in the Control condition (delta (δ): 74 [40.3;107.6] g). Both mean daily fruit and vegetable intake were higher in participants in the Snacks + FV condition than in participants in the Control condition (fruit δ: 81.3 [56.5;106.2] g; vegetables δ: 46.2 [17.5;74.9] g), as well as in the Snacks condition (fruit δ: 70.0 [38.8;101.1] g; vegetables δ: 62.2 [26.2; 98.2] g).
CONCLUSIONS: This study shows that improving the dietary quality of food parcels can positively impact the dietary intake of Dutch food bank recipients. With this information we can further develop effective strategies that can be easily applied by food banks, to improve dietary intake of food bank recipients.

Keywords

References

  1. Public Health Nutr. 2008 May;11(5):444-56 [PMID: 17672921]
  2. Br J Nutr. 2016 Aug;116(3):526-33 [PMID: 27229880]
  3. Eur J Nutr. 2018 Dec;57(8):2747-2758 [PMID: 28975454]
  4. Public Health Nutr. 2020 Jun;23(9):1647-1656 [PMID: 32066521]
  5. Public Health Nutr. 2008 Apr;11(4):395-404 [PMID: 17666136]
  6. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Apr;117(4):577-588 [PMID: 27727101]
  7. JAMA Intern Med. 2016 Nov 1;176(11):1610-1618 [PMID: 27653735]
  8. Health Equity. 2017 Jan 01;1(1):28-34 [PMID: 30283833]
  9. Am J Clin Nutr. 2013 Aug;98(2):454-9 [PMID: 23803880]
  10. CMAJ. 2003 Mar 18;168(6):686-91 [PMID: 12642423]
  11. Am J Prev Med. 2015 Oct;49(4):594-604 [PMID: 26238602]
  12. Fam Med. 2000 Oct;32(9):595-6 [PMID: 11039142]
  13. Soc Sci Med. 2012 Jun;74(11):1754-64 [PMID: 22245381]
  14. Am J Clin Nutr. 2002 Jul;76(1):93-9 [PMID: 12081821]
  15. Am J Clin Nutr. 2012 Nov;96(5):977-88 [PMID: 23034960]
  16. J Am Diet Assoc. 2004 Apr;104(4):595-603 [PMID: 15054345]
  17. BMJ Open. 2014 May 16;4(5):e004657 [PMID: 24838723]
  18. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2003 Jan-Feb;35(1):6-15 [PMID: 12588675]
  19. Front Nutr. 2018 Dec 18;5:123 [PMID: 30619869]
  20. World Health Organ Tech Rep Ser. 1995;854:1-452 [PMID: 8594834]
  21. J Am Diet Assoc. 1996 Nov;96(11):1140-4 [PMID: 8906138]
  22. Am J Clin Nutr. 2008 Aug;88(2):324-32 [PMID: 18689367]
  23. Prev Med Rep. 2018 Jan 28;9:96-101 [PMID: 29527460]
  24. Int J Obes (Lond). 2007 Jun;31(6):956-61 [PMID: 17299385]
  25. J Acad Nutr Diet. 2017 Apr;117(4):563-576 [PMID: 27727100]
  26. Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2017 Oct 15;14(10): [PMID: 29036936]
  27. J Hum Nutr Diet. 2011 Dec;24(6):560-71 [PMID: 21564343]
  28. Am J Epidemiol. 2014 Jul 15;180(2):172-88 [PMID: 24918187]
  29. J Nutr Educ Behav. 2013 Mar;45(2):159-64 [PMID: 23219294]
  30. Am J Clin Nutr. 2016 Aug;104(2):423-35 [PMID: 27334234]

Grants

  1. 115100003/ZonMw

MeSH Term

Diet
Diet, Healthy
Eating
Feeding Behavior
Fruit
Humans
Vegetables

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0fooddietaryintakefruitdailybankparticipantsconditiongqualityparcelscanrecipientsstandardparcel2vegetablesδ:banksimprovingDutchControlsnacks3dietsstudyusingstrategiespositivelyimpactrandomizedcontrolledtrialinterventionconditionsreplacementunhealthystaplefoodsFVplusrecommendedamount4Dietaryvegetablehighermean7452]PURPOSE:Sincestronginfluencerecipients'seemdifficultiessupportinghealthyimportantaimassesswhetherdifferentactualMETHODS:cross-overTrialID:ISRCTN40554133four[1snacks + FV]included163threebaselinefilledquestionnairedatacollected24-hrecalls8 weeksfollow-upPrimaryoutcomesecondaryoutcomesintakesgroupsnutrientsRESULTS:Multi-levellinearregressionanalysistwo-levelmodelshoweddeltaδ:[401076]Snacks + FV81[5610646[179]wellSnacks700[3881011]62[2698CONCLUSIONS:showsinformationdevelopeffectiveeasilyappliedimproveImprovingleadsimprovedrecipients-effectsFoodassistanceprogramsInterventionLow-socioeconomicstatusNutritionPublichealth

Similar Articles

Cited By