Working memory predictors of mathematics across the middle primary school years.

Katie Allen, David Giofrè, Steve Higgins, John Adams
Author Information
  1. Katie Allen: School of Education, University of Durham, UK. ORCID
  2. David Giofrè: Dipartimento di Scienze della Formazione (DISFOR), University of Genoa, Italy. ORCID
  3. Steve Higgins: School of Education, University of Durham, UK. ORCID
  4. John Adams: Department of Psychology, University of Durham, UK. ORCID

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Work surrounding the relationship between visuospatial working memory (WM) and mathematics performance is gaining significant traction as a result of a focus on improving academic attainment.
AIMS: This study examined the relative contributions of verbal and visuospatial simple and complex WM measures to mathematics in primary school children aged 6-10 years.
SAMPLE: A sample of 111 children in years 2-5 were assessed (M  = 100.06 months, SD = 14.47).
METHOD: Children were tested individually on all memory measures, followed by a separate mathematics testing session as a class group in the same assessment wave.
RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Results revealed an age-dependent relationship, with a move towards visuospatial influence in older children. Further analyses demonstrated that backward word span and backward matrices contributed unique portions of variance of mathematics, regardless of the regression model specified. We discuss possible explanations for our preliminary findings in relation to the existing literature alongside their implications for educators and further research.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Methods. 2018 Dec;23(4):617-634 [PMID: 29595293]
  2. Science. 1992 Jan 31;255(5044):556-9 [PMID: 1736359]
  3. Trends Cogn Sci. 2000 Nov 1;4(11):417-423 [PMID: 11058819]
  4. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 02;8(7):e67918 [PMID: 23844126]
  5. J Exp Child Psychol. 2007 Mar;96(3):197-228 [PMID: 17118398]
  6. Child Neuropsychol. 2008 Sep;14(5):387-400 [PMID: 18608224]
  7. Neuropsychologia. 2006;44(11):2017-36 [PMID: 16527316]
  8. Psychon Bull Rev. 2005 Oct;12(5):769-86 [PMID: 16523997]
  9. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 31;8(7):e70160 [PMID: 23936154]
  10. Child Dev. 2006 Nov-Dec;77(6):1698-716 [PMID: 17107455]
  11. J Exp Child Psychol. 1993 Aug;56(1):87-114 [PMID: 8366327]
  12. Mem Cognit. 2002 Apr;30(3):447-55 [PMID: 12061765]
  13. Psychol Bull. 2007 Nov;133(6):1038-66 [PMID: 17967093]
  14. J Exp Psychol Gen. 1999 Sep;128(3):309-331 [PMID: 10513398]
  15. J Exp Psychol Gen. 2004 Jun;133(2):189-217 [PMID: 15149250]
  16. Child Dev. 2007 Jul-Aug;78(4):1343-59 [PMID: 17650142]
  17. Br J Dev Psychol. 2018 Jun;36(2):220-235 [PMID: 28833308]
  18. Dev Neuropsychol. 2008;33(3):205-28 [PMID: 18473197]
  19. Cortex. 2013 Nov-Dec;49(10):2674-88 [PMID: 23890692]
  20. Front Psychol. 2017 May 04;8:663 [PMID: 28522982]
  21. Q J Exp Psychol (Hove). 2020 Feb;73(2):239-248 [PMID: 31390931]
  22. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1998 Feb 3;95(3):876-82 [PMID: 9448254]
  23. J Exp Child Psychol. 2009 Jun;103(2):186-201 [PMID: 19281998]
  24. J Learn Disabil. 2005 Jul-Aug;38(4):293-304 [PMID: 16122059]
  25. J Investig Med. 2006 May;54(4):174-9 [PMID: 17152856]
  26. Front Psychol. 2015 Jul 23;6:1062 [PMID: 26257701]
  27. Psychon Bull Rev. 2006 Jun;13(3):452-7 [PMID: 17048730]
  28. Psychol Res. 2013 Jul;77(4):508-15 [PMID: 22868655]
  29. Neuropsychologia. 1997 Oct;35(10):1341-53 [PMID: 9347480]
  30. J Learn Disabil. 2001 Sep-Oct;34(5):418-34 [PMID: 15503591]
  31. J Exp Child Psychol. 2014 Jul;123:112-28 [PMID: 24709286]
  32. Mem Cognit. 2015 Apr;43(3):367-78 [PMID: 25377509]
  33. Mem Cognit. 2001 Jan;29(1):1-9 [PMID: 11277452]

Grants

  1. ES/P000762/1/Economic and Social Research Council

MeSH Term

Child
Child Development
Female
Humans
Male
Mathematical Concepts
Mathematics
Memory, Short-Term
Schools
Spatial Memory
Students
Verbal Learning
Visual Perception

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0mathematicsvisuospatialchildrenmemoryrelationshipWMverbalmeasuresprimaryschoolyearsbackwardBACKGROUND:WorksurroundingworkingperformancegainingsignificanttractionresultfocusimprovingacademicattainmentAIMS:studyexaminedrelativecontributionssimplecomplexaged6-10 yearsSAMPLE:sample1112-5assessedM = 10006 monthsSD = 1447METHOD:ChildrentestedindividuallyfollowedseparatetestingsessionclassgroupassessmentwaveRESULTSANDCONCLUSIONS:Resultsrevealedage-dependentmovetowardsinfluenceolderanalysesdemonstratedwordspanmatricescontributeduniqueportionsvarianceregardlessregressionmodelspecifieddiscusspossibleexplanationspreliminaryfindingsrelationexistingliteraturealongsideimplicationseducatorsresearchWorkingpredictorsacrossmiddle

Similar Articles

Cited By