Toward Integration of mHealth in Primary Care in the Netherlands: A Qualitative Analysis of Stakeholder Perspectives.

Esmee L S Bally, Tomris Cesuroglu
Author Information
  1. Esmee L S Bally: Faculty of Science, Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.
  2. Tomris Cesuroglu: Faculty of Science, Athena Institute, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, Netherlands.

Abstract

There is a growing need to structurally change the way chronic illness care is organized as health systems struggle to meet the demand for chronic care. mHealth technologies can alter traditional approaches to health care provision by stimulating self-management of chronically ill patients. The aim of this study was to understand the complex environment related to the introduction of mHealth solutions into primary care for chronic disease management while considering health system functioning and stakeholder views. A transdisciplinary approach was used informed by the Interactive Learning and Action (ILA) methodology. Exploratory interviews ( = 5) were held with representatives of stakeholder groups to identify and position key stakeholders. Subsequently, professionals and chronically ill patients were consulted separately to elaborate on the barriers and facilitators in integration, using semi-structured interviews ( = 17) and a focus group ( = 6). Follow-up interviews ( = 5) were conducted to discuss initial findings of the stakeholder analysis. Most stakeholders, in particular primary care practitioners and patients, seem to have a supporting or mixed attitude toward integration of mHealth. On the other hand, several powerful stakeholders, including primary care information system developers and medical specialists are likely to show resistance or a lack of initiative toward mHealth integration. Main barriers to mHealth integration were a lack of interoperability with existing information systems; difficulties in financing mHealth implementation; and limited readiness in general practices to change. Potential enablers of integration included co-design of mHealth solutions and incentives for pioneers. Stakeholders acknowledge the benefits of integrating mHealth in primary care. However, important barriers perceived by end-users prevent them to fully adopt and use mHealth. This study shows that the complexity of introducing mHealth into primary care calls for strategies encouraging collaboration between multiple stakeholders to enhance successful implementation.

Keywords

References

  1. Syst Synth Biol. 2013 Sep;7(3):127-38 [PMID: 24432150]
  2. PLoS Med. 2013;10(2):e1001382 [PMID: 23424286]
  3. Cost Eff Resour Alloc. 2018 Jun 25;16:25 [PMID: 29983645]
  4. Curr HIV/AIDS Rep. 2019 Aug;16(4):335-348 [PMID: 31250195]
  5. Int J Med Inform. 2013 May;82(5):e73-86 [PMID: 23146626]
  6. JMIR Pediatr Parent. 2018 Dec 10;1(2):e11080 [PMID: 31518297]
  7. Res Social Adm Pharm. 2017 May - Jun;13(3):539-552 [PMID: 27485770]
  8. J Diabetes. 2018 Jan;10(1):10-17 [PMID: 28872765]
  9. J Med Internet Res. 2013 Oct 30;15(10):e236 [PMID: 24172852]
  10. Yearb Med Inform. 2002;(1):103-114 [PMID: 27706359]
  11. J Med Internet Res. 2019 Jun 17;21(6):e13166 [PMID: 31210136]
  12. EPMA J. 2016 Jan 30;7:2 [PMID: 26913090]
  13. Int J Technol Assess Health Care. 2013 Apr;29(2):155-61 [PMID: 23514722]
  14. Comput Inform Nurs. 2010 Jan-Feb;28(1):49-56 [PMID: 19940621]
  15. Ann Intern Med. 2012 May 15;156(10):673-83 [PMID: 22586006]
  16. Stud Health Technol Inform. 2015;216:467-71 [PMID: 26262094]
  17. Diabetes Care. 2009 Apr;32(4):559-66 [PMID: 19131469]
  18. BMC Health Serv Res. 2012 Aug 07;12:242 [PMID: 22871023]
  19. Health Policy. 2016 Apr;120(4):431-9 [PMID: 27017047]
  20. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2016 Sep 09;4(3):e107 [PMID: 27613084]
  21. Prev Sci. 2019 Jan;20(1):100-109 [PMID: 29318443]
  22. Int J Med Inform. 2017 Apr;100:77-89 [PMID: 28241940]
  23. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2014 May 16;2(2):e24 [PMID: 25099752]
  24. Fam Pract. 2019 Mar 20;36(2):214-218 [PMID: 29873708]
  25. J Asthma. 2001 Jun;38(4):321-30 [PMID: 11456385]
  26. Glob Qual Nurs Res. 2016 Mar 14;3:2333393616630466 [PMID: 28462326]
  27. Int J Med Inform. 2007 May-Jun;76(5-6):480-3 [PMID: 17064955]
  28. Health Expect. 2005 Sep;8(3):253-63 [PMID: 16098155]
  29. Behav Ther. 2019 Jul;50(4):817-827 [PMID: 31208690]
  30. J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2016 Jan;23(1):212-20 [PMID: 26078410]
  31. Neth Heart J. 2016 Nov;24(11):647-652 [PMID: 27646112]
  32. Gynecol Oncol. 2019 Apr;153(1):100-107 [PMID: 30718125]
  33. Public Health Genomics. 2014;17(5-6):287-98 [PMID: 25401385]
  34. Nature. 2011 Feb 10;470(7333):204-13 [PMID: 21307933]
  35. Health Inf Sci Syst. 2015 May 13;3:1 [PMID: 26167279]
  36. Burns. 2010 Mar;36(2):217-31 [PMID: 19577849]
  37. Int J Qual Health Care. 2017 Nov 1;29(7):916-921 [PMID: 29077863]
  38. JMIR Med Inform. 2016 Apr 06;4(2):e11 [PMID: 27052805]
  39. Eval Program Plann. 2009 Feb;32(1):31-42 [PMID: 19004496]
  40. Health Expect. 2010 Jun;13(2):160-73 [PMID: 20536537]
  41. J Med Internet Res. 2017 Dec 12;19(12):e406 [PMID: 29233804]
  42. Am J Manag Care. 2005 Aug;11(8):478-88 [PMID: 16095434]
  43. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth. 2015 Jun 02;3(2):e62 [PMID: 26036753]
  44. Health Syst Transit. 2016 Mar;18(2):1-240 [PMID: 27467715]
  45. Bull World Health Organ. 2000;78(6):717-31 [PMID: 10916909]
  46. Inform Prim Care. 2005;13(2):145-52 [PMID: 15992499]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0mHealthcareintegrationhealthprimarychronicstakeholder=stakeholderspatientssysteminterviewsbarrierschangesystemschronicallyillstudysolutionsdiseasemanagementtransdisciplinary5analysistowardinformationlackimplementationresearchgrowingneedstructurallywayillnessorganizedstrugglemeetdemandtechnologiescanaltertraditionalapproachesprovisionstimulatingself-managementaimunderstandcomplexenvironmentrelatedintroductionconsideringfunctioningviewsapproachusedinformedInteractiveLearningActionILAmethodologyExploratoryheldrepresentativesgroupsidentifypositionkeySubsequentlyprofessionalsconsultedseparatelyelaboratefacilitatorsusingsemi-structured17focusgroup6Follow-upconducteddiscussinitialfindingsparticularpractitionersseemsupportingmixedattitudehandseveralpowerfulincludingdevelopersmedicalspecialistslikelyshowresistanceinitiativeMaininteroperabilityexistingdifficultiesfinancinglimitedreadinessgeneralpracticesPotentialenablersincludedco-designincentivespioneersStakeholdersacknowledgebenefitsintegratingHoweverimportantperceivedend-userspreventfullyadoptuseshowscomplexityintroducingcallsstrategiesencouragingcollaborationmultipleenhancesuccessfulTowardIntegrationPrimaryCareNetherlands:QualitativeAnalysisStakeholderPerspectivesparticipatorypersonalized

Similar Articles

Cited By