Group cognitive behavioural therapy (GCBT) versus treatment as usual (TAU) in the treatment of irritable bowel syndrome (IBS): a study protocol for a randomized controlled trial.

Shino Kikuchi, Yuki Oe, Yohei Sasaki, Hirono Ishii, Yuri Ito, Masaru Horikoshi, Takashi Sozu, Hiroshi Seno, Toshi A Furukawa
Author Information
  1. Shino Kikuchi: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan. shino_k@kuhp.kyoto-u.ac.jp. ORCID
  2. Yuki Oe: National Center for Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Research, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan.
  3. Yohei Sasaki: National Center for Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Research, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan.
  4. Hirono Ishii: National Center for Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Research, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan.
  5. Yuri Ito: Department of Computer Science, Tokyo University of Science, 6-3-1 Shinjyuku, Katuragi-ku, Tokyo, Japan.
  6. Masaru Horikoshi: National Center for Cognitive Behavior Therapy and Research, National Center of Neurology and Psychiatry, 4-1-1 Ogawa Higashi, Kodaira, Tokyo, Japan.
  7. Takashi Sozu: Kyoto University Hospital 54 Kawaharacho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
  8. Hiroshi Seno: Department of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine, 54 Kawahara-cho, Shogoin, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.
  9. Toshi A Furukawa: Department of Health Promotion and Human Behavior, Kyoto University Graduate School of Medicine / School of Public Health, Yoshida Konoe-cho, Sakyo-ku, Kyoto, Japan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Irritable bowel syndrome (IBS) is a common disease that affects the quality of life (QOL) and social functioning of sufferers. Visceral anxiety is currently considered a key factor in the onset and exacerbation of IBS, and cognitive-behavioural therapy (CBT) targeting visceral anxiety is thought to be effective. However, access to CBT is limited due to the lack of trained therapists, the substantial time required for therapy and the associated costs. Group CBT (GCBT) may solve some of these problems. We have therefore planned this trial to examine the efficacy of GCBT for IBS.
METHODS: The trial is a two-armed, parallel group, open label, stratified block randomized superiority trial. The study group will consist of 112 participants (aged 18-75 years) with IBS (Rome-III or IV criteria). Participants will be randomly allocated 1:1 to (i) the intervention group: ten-week GCBT plus treatment as usual (TAU) or (ii) the control group: waiting list (WL) plus TAU. The co-primary outcomes are the change in IBS severity or disease-specific quality of life from baseline to week 13 which is 1 month after the end of treatment. The efficacy of GCBT for IBS will be examined through mixed-effects repeated-measures analysis.
DISCUSSION: GCBT, if found effective, can address the issues of the shortage of therapists as well as the time required and the costs associated with individual CBT. Clinically, the findings will help make effective CBT programmes accessible to a large number of distressed IBS patients at lower costs. Theoretically, the results will clarify the relationship between IBS and psychological stress and will help elucidate the underlying mechanisms of IBS.
TRIAL REGISTRATION: UMIN, CTR-UMIN000031710. Registered on March 13, 2018.

Keywords

References

  1. JAMA. 2018 Feb 6;319(5):483-494 [PMID: 29411037]
  2. Dig Dis Sci. 1998 Feb;43(2):400-11 [PMID: 9512138]
  3. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Sep;109(9):1350-65; quiz 1366 [PMID: 24935275]
  4. Lancet. 2010 Mar 13;375(9718):916-23 [PMID: 20189241]
  5. Behav Res Ther. 2007 Apr;45(4):633-48 [PMID: 16979581]
  6. Gastroenterology. 2000 Sep;119(3):654-60 [PMID: 10982758]
  7. Biopsychosoc Med. 2007 Mar 03;1:6 [PMID: 17371576]
  8. BMC Gastroenterol. 2011 Oct 12;11:110 [PMID: 21992655]
  9. J Gen Intern Med. 2001 Sep;16(9):606-13 [PMID: 11556941]
  10. Psychol Bull. 1992 Jul;112(1):155-9 [PMID: 19565683]
  11. Gut. 2007 Dec;56(12):1770-98 [PMID: 17488783]
  12. Arch Intern Med. 2006 May 22;166(10):1092-7 [PMID: 16717171]
  13. Gut. 1997 Oct;41(4):505-12 [PMID: 9391250]
  14. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2013 Mar;11(3):208-16; quiz e22-3 [PMID: 23103907]
  15. Zhonghua Gan Zang Bing Za Zhi. 2014 Oct;22(10):781-91 [PMID: 25558501]
  16. Psychol Rev. 2001 Jan;108(1):4-32 [PMID: 11212632]
  17. J Gastroenterol. 2015 Jan;50(1):11-30 [PMID: 25500976]
  18. Aust N Z J Psychiatry. 2005 Aug;39(8):683-92 [PMID: 16050922]
  19. Behav Res Ther. 2006 Jan;44(1):85-98 [PMID: 16301016]
  20. J Gastroenterol. 2006 May;41(5):491-4 [PMID: 16799892]
  21. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2018 Apr;16(4):462-466.e2 [PMID: 29555225]
  22. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2012 Jul;10(7):712-721.e4 [PMID: 22426087]
  23. Stat Med. 2003 Oct 30;22(20):3133-50 [PMID: 14518019]
  24. Qual Life Res. 1998 Jan;7(1):75-83 [PMID: 9481153]
  25. Pharm Stat. 2008 Apr-Jun;7(2):93-106 [PMID: 17351897]
  26. Health Policy. 1996 Jul;37(1):53-72 [PMID: 10158943]
  27. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Jul;102(7):1442-53 [PMID: 17509027]
  28. BMJ. 2014 Mar 07;348:g1687 [PMID: 24609605]
  29. Gut. 2012 Sep;61(9):1284-90 [PMID: 22234979]
  30. Dig Dis Sci. 2003 Jul;48(7):1317-23 [PMID: 12870789]
  31. Br J Clin Psychol. 1997 Feb;36(1):85-99 [PMID: 9051281]
  32. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2004 May;2(5):395-9 [PMID: 15118977]
  33. Psychosom Med. 1996 Sep-Oct;58(5):508-14 [PMID: 8902902]
  34. Am J Gastroenterol. 2014 Aug;109 Suppl 1:S2-26; quiz S27 [PMID: 25091148]
  35. Gastroenterology. 2007 Aug;133(2):433-44 [PMID: 17681164]
  36. Ann Intern Med. 2013 Feb 5;158(3):200-7 [PMID: 23295957]
  37. Behav Res Ther. 1986;24(4):461-70 [PMID: 3741311]
  38. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 1997 Apr;11(2):395-402 [PMID: 9146781]
  39. Am J Gastroenterol. 2003 Mar;98(3):600-7 [PMID: 12650794]
  40. Dig Dis Sci. 1988 Feb;33(2):129-34 [PMID: 3123181]
  41. Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol. 2016 Jul;14(7):937-947.e4 [PMID: 26721342]
  42. Spine (Phila Pa 1976). 2007 Jun 15;32(14):1474-81 [PMID: 17572614]
  43. Gastroenterology. 2016 May;150(6):1257-61 [PMID: 27147121]
  44. Gastroenterology. 2016 Feb 18;: [PMID: 27144627]
  45. Behav Res Ther. 2011 Jun;49(6-7):413-21 [PMID: 21565328]

Grants

  1. KEN37/Mental Health Okamoto Memorial Foundation

MeSH Term

Adolescent
Adult
Aged
Anxiety
Cognitive Behavioral Therapy
Humans
Irritable Bowel Syndrome
Middle Aged
Psychotherapy, Group
Quality of Life
Randomized Controlled Trials as Topic
Stress, Psychological
Treatment Outcome

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0IBSGCBTwilltherapyCBTtrialtreatmentbowelsyndromeeffectivecostsGroupTAUIrritablequalitylifeanxietytherapiststimerequiredassociatedefficacygrouprandomizedstudygroup:plususual13helpbehaviouralBACKGROUND:commondiseaseaffectsQOLsocialfunctioningsufferersVisceralcurrentlyconsideredkeyfactoronsetexacerbationcognitive-behaviouraltargetingvisceralthoughtHoweveraccesslimitedduelacktrainedsubstantialmaysolveproblemsthereforeplannedexamineMETHODS:two-armedparallelopenlabelstratifiedblocksuperiorityconsist112participantsaged18-75 yearsRome-IIIIVcriteriaParticipantsrandomlyallocated1:1interventionten-weekiicontrolwaitinglistWLco-primaryoutcomeschangeseveritydisease-specificbaselineweek1 monthendexaminedmixed-effectsrepeated-measuresanalysisDISCUSSION:foundcanaddressissuesshortagewellindividualClinicallyfindingsmakeprogrammesaccessiblelargenumberdistressedpatientslowerTheoreticallyresultsclarifyrelationshippsychologicalstresselucidateunderlyingmechanismsTRIALREGISTRATION:UMINCTR-UMIN000031710RegisteredMarch2018cognitiveversusirritable:protocolcontrolledCognitiveFunctionalgastrointestinaldisorder

Similar Articles

Cited By