Diagnostic accuracy of lamellar body count as a predictor of fetal lung maturity: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Ahmed Mahmoud Abdou, Mohammad S Badr, Khaled F Helal, Mohamed E Rafeek, Amr A Abdelrhman, Mahmoud Kotb
Author Information
  1. Ahmed Mahmoud Abdou: Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt.
  2. Mohammad S Badr: Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt.
  3. Khaled F Helal: Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt.
  4. Mohamed E Rafeek: Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt.
  5. Amr A Abdelrhman: Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt.
  6. Mahmoud Kotb: Faculty of Medicine, Zagazig University, Egypt.

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This study aimed to synthesize evidence from published studies about the diagnostic accuracy of lamellar body count (LBC) as a predictor of fetal lung maturity.
STUDY DESIGN: We searched Medline (via PubMed), EBSCO, Web of Science, Scopus and the Cochrane Library for relevant published studies assessing the accuracy of LBC as a predictor of fetal lung maturity. Studies were classified according to the counting essays, centrifugation protocols, and the reported optimum cut off values. Data of the true positive, true negative, false positive, and false negative were extracted and analyzed to calculate the overall sensitivity and specificity of the LBC.
RESULTS: Thirty-one studies were included in the final analysis. Fourteen studies reported data for centrifuged amniotic fluid (AF) samples, 13 studies reported data for uncentrifuged samples, and four studies did not have enough information about whether centrifugation was done. LBC showed an area under the curve >80% in diagnosing lung immaturity with variable cut off values. Pooled analysis showed that LBC a 100% specificity to exclude respiratory distress syndrome (RDS) at a cut off value of 15,000 and 100% sensitivity to diagnose RDS at a cut off value of 55,000.
CONCLUSION: Cases with LBC < 15,000 are considered to have lung immaturity while cases with LBC > 45,000 in centrifuged AF samples or >55,000 in uncentrifuged AF samples are likely to have mature lungs. Cases with LBC ranging between these maturity and immaturity limits should be considered for further evaluation by other lung maturity tests.

Keywords

References

  1. Eur Radiol. 2011 Jan;21(1):54-62 [PMID: 20680290]
  2. Obstet Gynecol. 2001 Feb;97(2):305-9 [PMID: 11165600]
  3. Biol Neonate. 1998;73(1):10-8 [PMID: 9458937]
  4. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2013 Jul;169(2):177-83 [PMID: 23481577]
  5. Ginecol Obstet Mex. 1997 May;65:202-6 [PMID: 9273330]
  6. J Matern Fetal Neonatal Med. 2009 May;22(5):419-22 [PMID: 19529999]
  7. Eur J Pediatr. 1993 Feb;152(2):152-6 [PMID: 8444225]
  8. BJOG. 2001 Jun;108(6):583-8 [PMID: 11426891]
  9. J Obstet Gynaecol. 2005 Apr;25(3):257-9 [PMID: 16147729]
  10. J Perinatol. 1996 May-Jun;16(3 Pt 1):176-80 [PMID: 8817425]
  11. Eur J Radiol. 2012 Dec;81(12):3711-8 [PMID: 21420812]
  12. Acta Paediatr. 2003 Jun;92(6):728-33 [PMID: 12856986]
  13. Pediatr Pulmonol. 1998 Jun;25(6):383-9 [PMID: 9671165]
  14. N Engl J Med. 1972 May 18;286(20):1077-81 [PMID: 5067186]
  15. Biol Neonate. 2005;87(2):140-4 [PMID: 15637456]
  16. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1971 Feb 1;109(3):440-5 [PMID: 5107880]
  17. BMJ. 2015 Jan 02;350:g7647 [PMID: 25555855]
  18. Rofo. 2008 Oct;180(10):879-83 [PMID: 19238637]
  19. Ann Intern Med. 2011 Oct 18;155(8):529-36 [PMID: 22007046]
  20. Am J Clin Pathol. 2006 Dec;126(6):894-9 [PMID: 17074687]
  21. Pediatr Crit Care Med. 2012 Mar;13(2):178-82 [PMID: 21499171]
  22. Saudi Med J. 2005 Sep;26(9):1414-6 [PMID: 16155659]
  23. Clin Chem. 2003 Jun;49(6 Pt 1):994-7 [PMID: 12766010]
  24. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2002 Jun;77(3):217-21 [PMID: 12065132]
  25. Scand J Clin Lab Invest. 2010 Sep;70(5):358-63 [PMID: 20509824]
  26. Eur J Radiol. 2008 Dec;68(3):369-74 [PMID: 18775618]
  27. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 1997 Feb;56(2):191-8 [PMID: 9061400]
  28. J Am Osteopath Assoc. 2002 Aug;102(8):423-8 [PMID: 12201546]
  29. Clin Chim Acta. 2004 Feb;340(1-2):85-92 [PMID: 14734199]
  30. Neonatology. 2010;98(2):150-5 [PMID: 20234139]
  31. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2005 Apr;89(1):19-25 [PMID: 15777893]
  32. Acta Radiol. 2009 Oct;50(8):892-901 [PMID: 19639470]
  33. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2010 Jan;281(1):15-21 [PMID: 19381669]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0lungstudiesLBCmaturity000cutsamplesaccuracybodycountpredictorfetalreportedAFimmaturitypublishedlamellarcentrifugationvaluestruepositivenegativefalsesensitivityspecificityanalysisdatacentrifugeduncentrifugedshowed100%RDSvalueCasesconsideredreviewOBJECTIVE:studyaimedsynthesizeevidencediagnosticSTUDYDESIGN:searchedMedlineviaPubMedEBSCOWebScienceScopusCochraneLibraryrelevantassessingStudiesclassifiedaccordingcountingessaysprotocolsoptimumDataextractedanalyzedcalculateoverallRESULTS:Thirty-oneincludedfinalFourteenamnioticfluid13fourenoughinformationwhetherdoneareacurve>80%diagnosingvariablePooledexcluderespiratorydistresssyndrome15diagnose55CONCLUSION:LBC < 15casesLBC > 45>55likelymaturelungsranginglimitsevaluationtestsDiagnosticmaturity:systematicmeta-analysisFetalLamellarMeta-analysisSystematic

Similar Articles

Cited By