Introduction of rotavirus vaccination in Palestine: An evaluation of the costs, impact, and cost-effectiveness of ROTARIX and ROTAVAC.

Frédéric Debellut, Samer Jaber, Yaser Bouzya, Jehad Sabbah, Mustafa Barham, Fakhr Abu-Awwad, Diaa Hjaija, Assad Ramlawi, Clint Pecenka, Andrew Clark, Mercy Mvundura
Author Information
  1. Frédéric Debellut: PATH, Geneva, Switzerland. ORCID
  2. Samer Jaber: Palestinian Ministry of Health, Nablus, West Bank.
  3. Yaser Bouzya: Palestinian Ministry of Health, Ramallah, West Bank.
  4. Jehad Sabbah: United Nations Relief and Works Agency for Palestine Refugees in the Middle East, East Jerusalem, Palestinian Territory.
  5. Mustafa Barham: Rostropovich-Vishnevskaya Foundation, Ramallah, West Bank.
  6. Fakhr Abu-Awwad: Rostropovich-Vishnevskaya Foundation, Gaza City, Gaza.
  7. Diaa Hjaija: Palestinian Ministry of Health, Ramallah, West Bank.
  8. Assad Ramlawi: Palestinian Ministry of Health, Ramallah, West Bank.
  9. Clint Pecenka: PATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.
  10. Andrew Clark: London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine, London, United Kingdom.
  11. Mercy Mvundura: PATH, Seattle, Washington, United States of America.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: The Palestinian Ministry of Health (MOH) started a routine rotavirus immunization program with ROTARIX in May 2016, with support for vaccine procurement and introduction provided through a global development organization. In 2018, financial responsibility for rotavirus vaccine procurement was transferred to the Palestinian government, which elected to shift to ROTAVAC vaccine because of its lower price per dose. This study aims to assess the cost, impact, and cost-effectiveness of rotavirus vaccination, specifically evaluating the economic implications of the change in vaccine product, accounting for the different characteristics of each rotavirus vaccine used.
METHODS: We conducted primary and secondary data collection to assess the introduction, procurement, supply chain, and service delivery costs related to each vaccine. We used the UNIVAC model to project costs and benefits of rotavirus vaccination over a 10-year period comparing the use of ROTARIX versus no vaccination; ROTAVAC versus no vaccination; and ROTAVAC versus ROTARIX. We undertook scenario and probabilistic analyses to capture uncertainty in some of the study parameters. We used a 3% discount rate, and all costs are in 2018 US$.
RESULTS: The cost to deliver one dose was lower for ROTAVAC than ROTARIX (US$2.36 versus $2.70), but the total cost per course, excluding vaccine cost, favored ROTARIX ($7.09 versus $5.39). Both vaccines had high probability of being cost-effective interventions in Palestine compared to no vaccine. Because of lower vaccination program costs for ROTAVAC, however, switching from ROTARIX to ROTAVAC was cost-saving.
CONCLUSION: National decision-makers should consider systematically assessing multiple criteria beyond vaccine price when comparing the health and economic value of several products in order to fully account for all characteristics including product presentation, number of doses per course, cold chain volume, cost of delivery, and wastage.

References

  1. PLoS One. 2009 Jun 26;4(6):e6060 [PMID: 19557133]
  2. Emerg Infect Dis. 2003 May;9(5):565-72 [PMID: 12737740]
  3. Vaccine. 2013 Jul 02;31 Suppl 3:C19-29 [PMID: 23777686]
  4. Lancet Glob Health. 2019 Nov;7(11):e1541-e1552 [PMID: 31607466]
  5. Vaccine. 2015 May 7;33 Suppl 1:A192-200 [PMID: 25919160]
  6. Lancet Infect Dis. 2017 Sep;17(9):909-948 [PMID: 28579426]
  7. Wkly Epidemiol Rec. 2013 Feb 1;88(5):49-64 [PMID: 23424730]
  8. Lancet. 2015 Jan 10;385(9963):117-71 [PMID: 25530442]
  9. Int J Health Plann Manage. 2013 Oct-Dec;28(4):320-32 [PMID: 23125096]
  10. Vaccine. 2017 Oct 27;35(45):6047-6058 [PMID: 28986034]
  11. Vaccine. 2018 Dec 14;36(51):7780-7789 [PMID: 30007826]
  12. Clin Infect Dis. 2019 Aug 30;69(6):1071-1078 [PMID: 30689799]
  13. Lancet. 2014 Jun 21;383(9935):2136-43 [PMID: 24629994]
  14. Lancet. 2013 Apr 20;381(9875):1405-1416 [PMID: 23582727]
  15. Lancet Glob Health. 2015 Nov;3(11):e712-23 [PMID: 26475018]
  16. Clin Infect Dis. 2016 May 1;62 Suppl 2:S96-S105 [PMID: 27059362]
  17. Vaccine. 2016 Jul 29;34(35):4213-4220 [PMID: 27371102]
  18. J Public Health (Oxf). 2019 Mar 1;41(1):e78-e83 [PMID: 29917158]
  19. Vaccine. 2018 Nov 26;36(49):7472-7478 [PMID: 30420039]
  20. J Health Popul Nutr. 2015 Mar;33(1):1-8 [PMID: 25995716]
  21. Lancet Infect Dis. 2019 Jul;19(7):717-727 [PMID: 31178289]
  22. J Infect Dis. 2010 Sep 1;202 Suppl:S12-22 [PMID: 20684691]
  23. Vaccine. 2018 Dec 14;36(51):7769-7774 [PMID: 29107346]
  24. Vaccine. 2019 Feb 4;37(6):798-807 [PMID: 30639458]
  25. Vaccine. 2015 Dec 16;33(51):7357-7363 [PMID: 26519548]

MeSH Term

Child
Child, Preschool
Cost-Benefit Analysis
Humans
Immunization Programs
Infant
Infant, Newborn
Middle East
Rotavirus
Rotavirus Infections
Rotavirus Vaccines
Vaccination

Chemicals

Rotavirus Vaccines

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0vaccineROTARIXROTAVACrotavirusvaccinationcostcostsversusprocurementlowerperusedPalestinianprogramintroduction2018pricedosestudyassessimpactcost-effectivenesseconomicproductcharacteristicschaindeliverycomparingcourseINTRODUCTION:MinistryHealthMOHstartedroutineimmunizationMay2016supportprovidedglobaldevelopmentorganizationfinancialresponsibilitytransferredgovernmentelectedshiftaimsspecificallyevaluatingimplicationschangeaccountingdifferentMETHODS:conductedprimarysecondarydatacollectionsupplyservicerelatedUNIVACmodelprojectbenefits10-yearperioduseundertookscenarioprobabilisticanalysescaptureuncertaintyparameters3%discountrateUS$RESULTS:deliveroneUS$236$270totalexcludingfavored$709$539vaccineshighprobabilitycost-effectiveinterventionsPalestinecomparedhoweverswitchingcost-savingCONCLUSION:Nationaldecision-makersconsidersystematicallyassessingmultiplecriteriabeyondhealthvalueseveralproductsorderfullyaccountincludingpresentationnumberdosescoldvolumewastageIntroductionPalestine:evaluation

Similar Articles

Cited By