Influence of heat stress on reference genes stability in heart and liver of two chickens genotypes.

Juliana Gracielle Gonzaga Gromboni, Haniel Cedraz de Oliveira, Daniele Botelho Diniz Marques, Antônio Amândio Pinto Garcia Junior, Ronaldo Vasconcelos Farias Filho, Caio Fernando Gromboni, Teillor Machado Souza, Amauri Arias Wenceslau
Author Information
  1. Juliana Gracielle Gonzaga Gromboni: Pos graduate program in Animal Science, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz-UESC, Ilhéus, BA, Brazil. ORCID
  2. Haniel Cedraz de Oliveira: Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil.
  3. Daniele Botelho Diniz Marques: Department of Animal Science, Universidade Federal de Viçosa, Viçosa, MG, Brazil. ORCID
  4. Antônio Amândio Pinto Garcia Junior: Department of Rural and Animal Technology, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Itapetinga, BA, Brazil.
  5. Ronaldo Vasconcelos Farias Filho: Department of Rural and Animal Technology, Universidade Estadual do Sudoeste da Bahia, Itapetinga, BA, Brazil.
  6. Caio Fernando Gromboni: Instituto Federal de Educação, Ciência e Tecnologia da Bahia-IFBA, Ilhéus, BA, Brazil.
  7. Teillor Machado Souza: Bachelor student of Veterinary Medicine, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz-UESC, Ilhéus, BA, Brazil.
  8. Amauri Arias Wenceslau: Department of Agricultural and Environmental Sciences, Universidade Estadual de Santa Cruz-UESC, Ilhéus, BA, Brazil.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Real-time polymerase chain reaction (RT-qPCR) is an important tool for analyzing gene expression. However, before analyzing the expression of target genes, it is crucial to normalize the reference genes, in order to find the most stable gene to be used as an endogenous control. A gene that remains stable in all samples under different treatments is considered a suitable normalizer. In this sense, we aimed to identify stable reference genes for normalization of target genes in the heart and liver tissues from two genetically divergent groups of chickens (Cobb 500® commercial line and Peloco backyard chickens) under comfort and acute heat stress environmental conditions. Eight reference genes (ACTB, HPRT1, RPL5, EEF1, MRPS27, MRPS30, TFRC and LDHA) were analyzed for expression stability. The samples were obtained from 24 chickens, 12 from the backyard Peloco and 12 from the Cobb 500® line, exposed to two environmental conditions (comfort and heat stress). Comfort temperature was 23°C and heat stress temperature was 39.5°C for one hour. Subsequently, the animals were euthanized, and heart and liver tissue fragments were collected for RNA extraction and amplification. To determine the stability rate of gene expression, three different statistical algorithms were applied: BestKeeper, geNorm and NormFinder, and to obtain an aggregated stability list, the RankAgregg package of R software was used.
RESULTS: The most stable genes using BestKeeper tool, including the two factors (genetic group and environmental condition), were LDHA, RPL5 and MRPS27 for heart tissue, and TFRC, RPL5 and EEF1 for liver tissue. Applying geNorm algorithm, the best reference genes were RPL5, EEF1 and MRPS30 for heart tissue and LDHA, EEF1 and RPL5 for liver. Using the NormFinder algorithm, the best normalizer genes were EEF1, RPL5 and LDHA in heart, and EEF1, RPL5 and ACTB in liver tissue. In the overall ranking obtained by RankAggreg package, considering the three algorithms, the RPL5, EEF1 and LDHA genes were the most stable for heart tissue, whereas RPL5, EEF1 and ACTB were the most stable for liver tissue.
CONCLUSION: According to the RankAggreg tool classification based on the three different algorithms (BestKeeper, geNorm and NormFinder), the most stable genes were RPL5, EEF1 and LDHA for heart tissue and RPL5, EEF1 and ACTB for liver tissue of chickens subjected to comfort and acute heat stress environmental conditions. However, the best reference genes may vary depending on the experimental conditions of each study, such as different breeds, environmental stressors, and tissues analyzed. Therefore, the need to perform priori studies to assay the best reference genes at the outset of each study is emphasized.

References

  1. PLoS One. 2013 Dec 16;8(12):e83041 [PMID: 24358246]
  2. Anal Biochem. 2005 Sep 1;344(1):141-3 [PMID: 16054107]
  3. Bioinformatics. 2007 Jul 1;23(13):1607-15 [PMID: 17483500]
  4. PLoS One. 2013 Jun 13;8(6):e66023 [PMID: 23785467]
  5. BMC Genomics. 2019 Sep 2;20(1):693 [PMID: 31477015]
  6. PLoS One. 2013;8(1):e53196 [PMID: 23301042]
  7. Biotechnol Lett. 2004 Mar;26(6):509-15 [PMID: 15127793]
  8. J Mol Endocrinol. 2005 Jun;34(3):597-601 [PMID: 15956331]
  9. J Appl Genet. 2008;49(4):367-72 [PMID: 19029684]
  10. Gene. 2015 Apr 25;561(1):82-7 [PMID: 25680290]
  11. PLoS One. 2014 Jun 13;9(6):e99678 [PMID: 24926893]
  12. Cancer Res. 2004 Aug 1;64(15):5245-50 [PMID: 15289330]
  13. Clin Chem. 2009 Apr;55(4):611-22 [PMID: 19246619]
  14. Genome Biol. 2002 Jun 18;3(7):RESEARCH0034 [PMID: 12184808]
  15. Gene. 2017 Jul 15;620:30-35 [PMID: 28390990]
  16. Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2010 Jul;136(1-2):151-6 [PMID: 20303182]
  17. PLoS One. 2012;7(2):e31263 [PMID: 22347455]
  18. Nat Protoc. 2006;1(3):1559-82 [PMID: 17406449]
  19. PLoS One. 2015 May 28;10(5):e0127935 [PMID: 26020643]
  20. Vet Clin Pathol. 2006 Jun;35(2):219-25 [PMID: 16783717]
  21. Sci Rep. 2019 Nov 1;9(1):15849 [PMID: 31676844]
  22. Fish Shellfish Immunol. 2011 Feb;30(2):638-45 [PMID: 21185941]
  23. PLoS One. 2017 May 1;12(5):e0176402 [PMID: 28459824]
  24. Gene. 2013 Sep 15;527(1):183-92 [PMID: 23792389]
  25. J Appl Genet. 2013 Nov;54(4):391-406 [PMID: 24078518]
  26. Plant Cell. 2008 Jul;20(7):1736-7 [PMID: 18664613]
  27. Mol Med Rep. 2017 Sep;16(3):2397-2410 [PMID: 28713914]
  28. Vet Clin North Am Exot Anim Pract. 2013 Jan;16(1):71-120 [PMID: 23347540]
  29. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004 Jul 30;320(3):1043-50 [PMID: 15240153]
  30. Mol Aspects Med. 2006 Apr-Jun;27(2-3):126-39 [PMID: 16469371]
  31. Poult Sci. 2018 Nov 1;97(11):4048-4056 [PMID: 30184115]
  32. Horm Behav. 2014 Jul;66(2):267-75 [PMID: 24780145]
  33. Mol Cell Probes. 2013 Jun-Aug;27(3-4):140-4 [PMID: 23499765]
  34. Biochem Biophys Res Commun. 2004 Jan 23;313(4):856-62 [PMID: 14706621]
  35. Biomed Res Int. 2014;2014:198582 [PMID: 24900955]
  36. PLoS One. 2016 Aug 18;11(8):e0160173 [PMID: 27537060]

MeSH Term

Algorithms
Animals
Chickens
Female
Genotype
Heat-Shock Response
L-Lactate Dehydrogenase
Liver
Male
Myocardium
Peptide Elongation Factor 1
RNA
Receptors, Transferrin
Temperature

Chemicals

Peptide Elongation Factor 1
Receptors, Transferrin
RNA
L-Lactate Dehydrogenase

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0genesRPL5EEF1tissueheartliverreferencestableLDHAchickensheatstressenvironmentalgeneexpressiondifferenttwoconditionsACTBstabilitybesttoolcomfortthreealgorithmsBestKeepergeNormNormFinderanalyzingHowevertargetusedsamplesnormalizertissuesCobb500®linePelocobackyardacuteMRPS27MRPS30TFRCanalyzedobtained12temperaturepackagealgorithmRankAggregstudyINTRODUCTION:Real-timepolymerasechainreactionRT-qPCRimportantcrucialnormalizeorderfindendogenouscontrolremainstreatmentsconsideredsuitablesenseaimedidentifynormalizationgeneticallydivergentgroupscommercialEightHPRT124exposedComfort23°C395°ConehourSubsequentlyanimalseuthanizedfragmentscollectedRNAextractionamplificationdetermineratestatisticalapplied:obtainaggregatedlistRankAgreggRsoftwareRESULTS:usingincludingfactorsgeneticgroupconditionApplyingUsingoverallrankingconsideringwhereasCONCLUSION:AccordingclassificationbasedsubjectedmayvarydependingexperimentalbreedsstressorsThereforeneedperformprioristudiesassayoutsetemphasizedInfluencegenotypes

Similar Articles

Cited By