PURPOSE: Improving access to essential medicines is necessary to reduce global mortality resulting from childhood cancer. However, there is a lack of context-specific data in many low- to middle-income countries on the determinants of access to essential childhood cancer medicines. We conducted a mixed-methods case study of the barriers to and enablers of access to WHO essential medicines for childhood cancer care in Trinidad and Tobago, in response to domestic calls for policy attention and reform.
METHODS: We interviewed stakeholders (N = 9) across the pharmaceutical supply system using a novel analytic framework and qualitative interview guide. Interviews were recorded, transcribed, and analyzed with constant comparative methods to capture emergent themes. Quantitatively, we examined alignment of the national essential medicines list with the 2017 WHO Essential Medicines List for Children (EMLc). National buyer prices for EMLc cancer medicines were compared with median international prices, with calculation of median price ratios to assess procurement efficiency.
RESULTS: Principal barriers identified included a lack of data-driven procurement, low supplier incentive to engage in tenders, reactive rather than proactive processes in response to stockouts, and siloed information systems. Recurring themes of regionalization, standardization, and proactivity emerged as priorities for policy reform. Quantitative analysis of the national essential medicines list and median price ratios for procured medicines aligned with findings reported qualitatively.
CONCLUSION: Our study contributes to global efforts to improve childhood cancer care by identifying policy-relevant evidence on access to essential childhood cancer medicines and providing a model for future studies in other jurisdictions.
