Circulating basophil count as a prognostic marker of tumor aggressiveness and survival outcomes in colorectal cancer.

Qi Liu, Dakui Luo, Sanjun Cai, Qingguo Li, Xinxiang Li
Author Information
  1. Qi Liu: Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, #270 Dongan Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
  2. Dakui Luo: Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, #270 Dongan Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
  3. Sanjun Cai: Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, #270 Dongan Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China.
  4. Qingguo Li: Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, #270 Dongan Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China. oncosurgeonli@sohu.com.
  5. Xinxiang Li: Department of Colorectal Surgery, Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center, #270 Dongan Road, Xuhui District, Shanghai, 200032, China. 1149lxx@sina.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Accumulating evidence demonstrated immune/inflammation-related implications of basophils in affecting tissue microenvironment that surrounded a tumor, and this study aimed to elucidate the clinical value of serum basophil count level.
METHODS: Between December 2007 and September 2013, 1029 patients diagnosed with stage I-III CRC in Fudan University Shanghai Cancer Center meeting the essential criteria were identified. The Kaplan-Meier method was used to construct the survival curves. Several Cox proportional hazard models were constructed to assess the prognostic factors. A simple predictor (CB classifier) was generated by combining serum basophil count and serum carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) level which had long been accepted as the most important and reliable prognostic factor in CRC.
RESULTS: The preoperative basophils count < 0.025*10/L was strongly associated with higher T stage, higher N stage, venous invasion, perineural invasion, elevated serum CEA level, and thus poor survival (P < 0.05). Moreover, multivariate Cox analysis showed that patients with low level of preoperative basophils count had an evidently poorer DFS [Hazard ratio (HR) = 2.197, 95% CI 1.868-2.585].
CONCLUSIONS: As a common immune/inflammation-related biomarker available from the blood routine examination, low level of preoperative serum basophil count was associated with aggressive biology and indicated evidently poor survival. Preoperative serum basophil count would be a useful and simple marker for the management of CRC patients.

Keywords

References

  1. Oncol Lett. 2015 Aug;10(2):754-760 [PMID: 26622565]
  2. J Clin Oncol. 2011 Dec 20;29(36):4796-802 [PMID: 22084366]
  3. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2013 Apr;22(4):661-9 [PMID: 23513040]
  4. Cancer Treat Rev. 2012 Aug;38(5):451-66 [PMID: 21945823]
  5. Ann Surg. 2017 Mar;265(3):539-546 [PMID: 27070934]
  6. CA Cancer J Clin. 2019 Jan;69(1):7-34 [PMID: 30620402]
  7. Eur J Cancer. 2003 Apr;39(6):718-27 [PMID: 12651195]
  8. Nat Med. 2011 Jan;17(1):87-95 [PMID: 21170045]
  9. Nat Immunol. 2008 Jul;9(7):733-42 [PMID: 18516038]
  10. Transl Gastrointest Cancer. 2012 Oct;1(3):215-227 [PMID: 24639917]
  11. Br J Surg. 2018 Jan;105(2):e99-e109 [PMID: 29341159]
  12. Mol Med Rep. 2019 Mar;19(3):2330-2340 [PMID: 30664202]
  13. Br J Pharmacol. 2020 Feb;177(3):516-538 [PMID: 30414378]
  14. Allergol Int. 2009 Mar;58(1):21-8 [PMID: 19153533]
  15. Immunol Lett. 2011 Dec 30;141(1):10-7 [PMID: 21756940]
  16. Ann Surg. 2016 Feb;263(2):326-36 [PMID: 25575264]
  17. Semin Immunol. 2018 Feb;35:29-34 [PMID: 29428698]
  18. Asia Pac J Clin Oncol. 2018 Oct;14(5):e243-e251 [PMID: 29532611]
  19. Eur J Cell Biol. 2008 Apr;87(4):227-36 [PMID: 18258331]
  20. Cancer Res. 2016 Apr 1;76(7):1792-803 [PMID: 26873846]
  21. Asian Pac J Cancer Prev. 2014;15(10):4225-31 [PMID: 24935375]
  22. Cancer. 2010 May 15;116(10):2372-81 [PMID: 20209617]
  23. Am J Pathol. 2017 Oct;187(10):2323-2336 [PMID: 28917668]
  24. Immunol Rev. 2017 Jul;278(1):237-245 [PMID: 28658549]
  25. Mol Immunol. 2015 Jan;63(1):94-103 [PMID: 24671125]
  26. Br J Pharmacol. 2013 Sep;170(1):188-99 [PMID: 23425150]
  27. Cancer Res. 2017 Jan 15;77(2):291-302 [PMID: 27879269]
  28. Eur J Cell Biol. 2003 Nov;82(11):539-48 [PMID: 14703010]
  29. Eur J Cancer. 2007 Jun;43(9):1348-60 [PMID: 17512720]
  30. Clin Cancer Res. 2004 Nov 1;10(21):7252-9 [PMID: 15534099]
  31. Cancer Res. 1998 Sep 15;58(18):4199-205 [PMID: 9751635]
  32. Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol. 2016 Oct;273(10):3371-84 [PMID: 26926692]
  33. Int J Cancer. 2006 Jun 15;118(12):3124-32 [PMID: 16395696]
  34. J Immunol. 2010 Dec 15;185(12):7180-5 [PMID: 21068399]
  35. Nature. 1990 Jul 19;346(6281):274-6 [PMID: 2374592]
  36. Blood Transfus. 2012 Apr;10(2):148-64 [PMID: 22244003]
  37. Blood. 1955 May;10(5):467-81 [PMID: 14363327]

Grants

  1. 81772599/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  2. 81972260/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  3. 81702353/National Natural Science Foundation of China
  4. 17ZR1406400/Natural Science Foundation of Shanghai

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0countserumbasophillevelsurvivalbasophilspatientsstageCRCprognosticpreoperativeimmune/inflammation-relatedtumorCoxsimpleantigenCEAassociatedhigherinvasionpoorlowevidentlymarkercancerBACKGROUND:AccumulatingevidencedemonstratedimplicationsaffectingtissuemicroenvironmentsurroundedstudyaimedelucidateclinicalvalueMETHODS:December2007September20131029diagnosedI-IIIFudanUniversityShanghaiCancerCentermeetingessentialcriteriaidentifiedKaplan-MeiermethodusedconstructcurvesSeveralproportionalhazardmodelsconstructedassessfactorspredictorCBclassifiergeneratedcombiningcarcinoembryoniclongacceptedimportantreliablefactorRESULTS:< 0025*10/LstronglyTNvenousperineuralelevatedthusP < 005MoreovermultivariateanalysisshowedpoorerDFS[HazardratioHR = 219795%CI1868-2585]CONCLUSIONS:commonbiomarkeravailablebloodroutineexaminationaggressivebiologyindicatedPreoperativeusefulmanagementCirculatingaggressivenessoutcomescolorectalBasophilsCarcinoembryonicClassifierColorectalImmune/inflammation

Similar Articles

Cited By (42)