Effectiveness of a Spousal Support Program in Improving the Quality of Life of Male Patients Undergoing Infertility Treatment: A Pilot Study.

Kyoko Asazawa, Mina Jitsuzaki, Akiko Mori, Tomohiko Ichikawa, Katsuko Shinozaki
Author Information
  1. Kyoko Asazawa: Faculty of Nursing, Tokyo Healthcare University, Tokyo, Japan.
  2. Mina Jitsuzaki: Department of Nursing, University of Occupational and Environmental Health, Fukuoka, Japan.
  3. Akiko Mori: Women's Health and Midwifery, Graduate School of Nursing Science, St. Luke's International University, Tokyo, Japan.
  4. Tomohiko Ichikawa: Graduate School of Medicine, Chiba University, Chiba, Japan.
  5. Katsuko Shinozaki: Graduate School of Health and Welfare Science, International University of Health and Welfare, Fukuoka, Japan.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: There are various causes of male infertility. Infertile men usually have a low quality of life (QoL) and a high level of stress compared with men without infertility problems. The present study aimed to examine the effects of a spousal support program to enhance the QoL of male patients undergoing infertility treatment.
METHODS: The present quasi-experimental study (pretest-posttest) was conducted among 38 infertile couples in Tokyo (Japan) during April-August 2018. The levels of QoL, distress, and spousal support were measured using self-administered valid and reliable questionnaires. The paired test was used to analyze pre- and post-intervention data with SPSS software (version 23.0). P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
RESULTS: There were significant differences between the pre-test and post-test scores for the relational and emotional sub-scales of QoL. The paired t test results showed that the post-test emotional sub-scale (66.9±16.9) was significantly higher than the pre-test emotional sub-scale (58.5±13.5; t (30)=2.2, P=0.04). Similarly, the post-test relational sub-scale (71.2±21.6) was significantly higher than its pre-test score (60.8±13.7; t (30)=2.3, P=0.03). The majority of the participants 23 (74.2%) expressed satisfaction with the program.
CONCLUSION: The spousal support program was well-received and significantly improved part of the QoL of men who were infertile due to various causes.

Keywords

References

  1. J Reprod Infertil. 2013 Jul;14(3):110-9 [PMID: 24163794]
  2. Health Qual Life Outcomes. 2018 Apr 24;16(1):73 [PMID: 29690877]
  3. Clin Biochem. 2018 Dec;62:2-10 [PMID: 29555319]
  4. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2019 Jul;16(3):329-341 [PMID: 30525294]
  5. Electron Physician. 2017 Jun 25;9(6):4694-4702 [PMID: 28848650]
  6. J Obstet Gynecol Neonatal Nurs. 2010 Mar-Apr;39(2):191-8 [PMID: 20409119]
  7. Arch Gynecol Obstet. 2012 Jul;286(1):217-29 [PMID: 22392488]
  8. Hum Reprod. 2011 May;26(5):1112-8 [PMID: 21372046]
  9. Hum Reprod. 2009 Jul;24(7):1656-64 [PMID: 19287047]
  10. J Psychosom Obstet Gynaecol. 2010 Jun;31(2):101-10 [PMID: 20443659]
  11. J Sex Med. 2009 Dec;6(12):3335-46 [PMID: 19515206]
  12. Int J Fertil Steril. 2018 Apr;12(1):19-26 [PMID: 29334202]
  13. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2015 Jul;12(3):208-21 [PMID: 25302746]
  14. J Assist Reprod Genet. 2017 Oct;34(10):1307-1315 [PMID: 28733802]
  15. Iran J Nurs Midwifery Res. 2018 May-Jun;23(3):198-204 [PMID: 29861758]
  16. Jpn J Nurs Sci. 2015 Oct;12(4):354-66 [PMID: 25780939]
  17. J Sex Med. 2009 Sep;6(9):2505-15 [PMID: 19619144]
  18. Asian J Androl. 2012 Jan;14(1):121-9 [PMID: 22179515]
  19. PLoS One. 2015 Oct 20;10(10):e0140581 [PMID: 26484531]
  20. Fertil Steril. 2011 Feb;95(2):717-21 [PMID: 21067728]
  21. Hum Reprod Update. 2016 Jun;22(4):466-78 [PMID: 27008894]
  22. Int J Nurs Stud. 2015 Oct;52(10):1640-52 [PMID: 26021885]
  23. PLoS Med. 2012;9(12):e1001356 [PMID: 23271957]
  24. Nihon Koshu Eisei Zasshi. 2000 Oct;47(10):866-78 [PMID: 11144156]
  25. J Res Health Sci. 2014 Winter;14(1):57-63 [PMID: 24402852]
  26. Urol Clin North Am. 2014 Feb;41(1):195-204 [PMID: 24286777]
  27. Int J Fertil Steril. 2018 Jan;11(4):293-297 [PMID: 29043705]
  28. Hum Reprod. 2017 Sep 1;32(9):1786-1801 [PMID: 29117321]
  29. J Adv Nurs. 2016 Mar;72(3):693-706 [PMID: 26466927]
  30. Hum Reprod. 2011 Aug;26(8):2084-91 [PMID: 21665875]
  31. Hum Reprod. 2013 Aug;28(8):2168-76 [PMID: 23748487]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0QoLinfertilitymenspousalsupportprogrampre-testpost-testemotionaltsub-scalesignificantlyvariouscausesmalelifepresentstudyinfertilepairedtest23significantrelationalhigher30=2P=0QualityMaleInfertilityBACKGROUND:InfertileusuallylowqualityhighlevelstresscomparedwithoutproblemsaimedexamineeffectsenhancepatientsundergoingtreatmentMETHODS:quasi-experimentalpretest-posttestconductedamong38couplesTokyoJapanApril-August2018levelsdistressmeasuredusingself-administeredvalidreliablequestionnairesusedanalyzepre-post-interventiondataSPSSsoftwareversion0P<005consideredstatisticallyRESULTS:differencesscoressub-scalesresultsshowed669±169585±135204Similarly712±216score608±137303majorityparticipants742%expressedsatisfactionCONCLUSION:well-receivedimprovedpartdueEffectivenessSpousalSupportProgramImprovingLifePatientsUndergoingTreatment:PilotStudyHealtheducation

Similar Articles

Cited By