Iliac Crest Bone Grafting for the Management of Anterior Shoulder Instability in Patients with Glenoid Bone Loss: a Systematic Review of Contemporary Literature.

Michael-Alexander Malahias, Dimitrios Chytas, Vasileios Raoulis, Efstathios Chronopoulos, Emmanouil Brilakis, Emmanouil Antonogiannakis
Author Information
  1. Michael-Alexander Malahias: 3rd Orthopaedic Department, Hygeia Hospital, Erythrou Stavrou 4, Marousi, 15123, Athens, Greece. alexandermalahias@yahoo.gr.
  2. Dimitrios Chytas: 2nd Orthopaedic Department, School of Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Agias Olgas 3, Nea Ionia, 14233, Athens, Greece.
  3. Vasileios Raoulis: Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Faculty of Medicine, School of Health Sciences, University of Thessaly, Larissa, Greece.
  4. Efstathios Chronopoulos: 2nd Orthopaedic Department, School of Medicine, National & Kapodistrian University of Athens, Agias Olgas 3, Nea Ionia, 14233, Athens, Greece.
  5. Emmanouil Brilakis: 3rd Orthopaedic Department, Hygeia Hospital, Erythrou Stavrou 4, Marousi, 15123, Athens, Greece.
  6. Emmanouil Antonogiannakis: 3rd Orthopaedic Department, Hygeia Hospital, Erythrou Stavrou 4, Marousi, 15123, Athens, Greece.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: A number of clinical trials have been published assessing the role of iliac crest bone grafting for the management of recurrent anterior instability with glenoid bone loss in contemporary practice. We therefore performed a systematic review of contemporary literature to examine the effect of iliac crest bone grafting on postoperative outcomes of these patients. Our hypothesis is that contemporary iliac crest bone block techniques are associated with low reoperation and complication rates combined with satisfactory functional results.
METHODS: The US National Library of Medicine (PubMed/MEDLINE), the Cochrane Database of Systematic Reviews, and EMBASE were searched between January 2008 and December 2019 for relevant publications.
RESULTS: Following the application of the inclusion-exclusion criteria, nine articles were found eligible for our analysis. In total, 261 patients (mean age range, 25.5-37.5 years; mean follow-up range, 20.6-42 months) were included in the studies of the current review. The mean modified Coleman score was 48.6 (range 37-65), indicating an overall low-to-moderate methodological quality. In the short term, the overall all-cause reoperation rate was 6.1%, while the rate of recurrent instability was 4.8%. The graft non-union rate was 2.2%, while the rate of osteolysis, graft fracture, and infection was 0.4%, 0.9%, and 1.7%, respectively. Finally, hardware-related complications, such as screw breakage or symptomatic mechanical irritation around the screw insertion, occurred in 3.9% of the patients.
CONCLUSIONS: Iliac crest bone block techniques in contemporary practice are safe and effective in the short-term (< 4 years) follow-up for the management of anterior shoulder instability with substantial glenoid bone deficiency. However, further studies of higher quality and longer follow-up are required to establish the therapeutic value of these techniques as well as to clarify whether there are differences in the outcomes of arthroscopic and open iliac crest bone block procedures.

Keywords

References

  1. Am J Sports Med. 2014 Apr;42(4):831-9 [PMID: 24510068]
  2. Arthroscopy. 2000 Oct;16(7):677-94 [PMID: 11027751]
  3. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2005 Aug;87(8):1752-60 [PMID: 16085615]
  4. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Jul;28(7):1298-1307 [PMID: 31129017]
  5. Am J Sports Med. 2010 Oct;38(10):2012-6 [PMID: 20595552]
  6. Am J Sports Med. 2016 May;44(5):1137-45 [PMID: 26865397]
  7. Arthroscopy. 2014 Sep;30(9):1184-211 [PMID: 24907025]
  8. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2018 Dec;26(12):3780-3787 [PMID: 29623353]
  9. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2008 Nov;128(11):1317-25 [PMID: 18196255]
  10. J Clin Orthop Trauma. 2019 Mar-Apr;10(2):231-235 [PMID: 30828183]
  11. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2011 Dec 7;93(23):2227-36 [PMID: 22159859]
  12. Shoulder Elbow. 2018 Jan;10(1):15-24 [PMID: 29276533]
  13. Orthop Clin North Am. 2010 Jul;41(3):381-92 [PMID: 20497813]
  14. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2000 Jan;82(1):35-46 [PMID: 10653082]
  15. World J Orthop. 2016 Jun 18;7(6):343-54 [PMID: 27335809]
  16. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Nov;23(11):1700-8 [PMID: 24930839]
  17. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2004 May-Jun;13(3):279-85 [PMID: 15111897]
  18. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev. 2017 Sep;25(3):123-130 [PMID: 28777214]
  19. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2016 Feb;24(2):546-56 [PMID: 26658567]
  20. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2018 May 15;26(10):e207-e218 [PMID: 29659379]
  21. Arthroscopy. 2017 Jan;33(1):39-48 [PMID: 27432589]
  22. Arthroscopy. 2018 Feb;34(2):352-359 [PMID: 29100764]
  23. Int Orthop. 2007 Oct;31(5):639-45 [PMID: 17021833]
  24. Am J Sports Med. 2005 Jun;33(6):912-25 [PMID: 15933206]
  25. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2018 Nov;138(11):1557-1562 [PMID: 29948225]
  26. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2014 Mar;23(3):420-6 [PMID: 24075998]
  27. Arthrosc Tech. 2019 Feb 18;8(3):e283-e289 [PMID: 31019886]
  28. Int Orthop. 2018 Oct;42(10):2491-2495 [PMID: 29744648]
  29. Arthroscopy. 2014 Dec;30(12):1642-9 [PMID: 24999006]
  30. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Jan;28(1):88-94 [PMID: 30121152]
  31. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2008 Jul;16(7):707-12 [PMID: 18446321]
  32. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jul 6;98(13):e56 [PMID: 27385690]
  33. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2017 Apr;26(4):e102-e107 [PMID: 28161242]
  34. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 Jul;29(5):957-966 [PMID: 30847680]
  35. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 2019 Feb;28(2):e33-e39 [PMID: 30545784]
  36. JBJS Rev. 2018 Oct;6(10):e10 [PMID: 30376462]

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0bonecrestiliacinstabilitycontemporaryblockratepatientstechniquesmeanrangefollow-upgraftIliacshoulderAnteriorGlenoidgraftingmanagementrecurrentanteriorglenoidlosspracticereviewoutcomesreoperationSystematicyearsstudies6overallquality409%screwBoneBACKGROUND:numberclinicaltrialspublishedassessingrolethereforeperformedsystematicliteratureexamineeffectpostoperativehypothesisassociatedlowcomplicationratescombinedsatisfactoryfunctionalresultsMETHODS:USNationalLibraryMedicinePubMed/MEDLINECochraneDatabaseReviewsEMBASEsearchedJanuary2008December2019relevantpublicationsRESULTS:Followingapplicationinclusion-exclusioncriterianinearticlesfoundeligibleanalysistotal261age255-375206-42monthsincludedcurrentmodifiedColemanscore4837-65indicatinglow-to-moderatemethodologicalshorttermall-cause1%8%non-union22%osteolysisfractureinfection4%17%respectivelyFinallyhardware-relatedcomplicationsbreakagesymptomaticmechanicalirritationaroundinsertionoccurred3CONCLUSIONS:safeeffectiveshort-term<substantialdeficiencyHoweverhigherlongerrequiredestablishtherapeuticvaluewellclarifywhetherdifferencesarthroscopicopenproceduresCrestGraftingManagementShoulderInstabilityPatientsLoss:ReviewContemporaryLiteraturedislocation

Similar Articles

Cited By