How Does Paradoxical Leadership Affect Employees' Voice Behaviors in Workplace? A Leader-Member Exchange Perspective.

Ying Xue, Xiyuan Li, Hao Liang, Yuan Li
Author Information
  1. Ying Xue: Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430072, China.
  2. Xiyuan Li: Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430072, China.
  3. Hao Liang: Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430072, China.
  4. Yuan Li: Economics and Management School, Wuhan University, Wuhan, Hubei, 430072, China.

Abstract

We theorized and tested a leader-member perspective beyond the existing studies in paradoxical leadership and employee voice behavior. We proposed that paradoxical leadership influences employees' voice behavior through psychological safety and self-efficacy. We also theorized that team size influences an extent to which the subordinates internalize their self-efficacy and psychological safety to exhibit proactive behavior. In a longitudinal study conducted on 155 subordinates and 96 supervisors in China, we found that when leaders adopt paradoxical behavior, employees are more likely to engage into promotive voice behavior; however, employees' prohibitive voice behavior is reduced when their leaders adopt paradoxes in leadership behavior. Additionally, psychological safety mediates the relationship between paradoxical leadership and promotive voice behavior. Further, team size has significant interaction effects with psychological safety on promotive voice behavior.

Keywords

References

  1. J Appl Psychol. 2008 Nov;93(6):1195-207 [PMID: 19025242]
  2. J Appl Psychol. 2008 Mar;93(2):392-423 [PMID: 18361640]
  3. Pers Soc Psychol Rev. 2008 Feb;12(1):22-49 [PMID: 18453471]
  4. J Appl Psychol. 2013 Sep;98(5):841-51 [PMID: 23647208]
  5. J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jan;92(1):107-27 [PMID: 17227155]
  6. J Organ Behav. 2017 Feb;38(2):276-303 [PMID: 28239234]
  7. J Theor Biol. 2010 Aug 21;265(4):633-46 [PMID: 20665973]
  8. J Appl Psychol. 2012 Sep;97(5):982-96 [PMID: 22774764]
  9. J Appl Psychol. 2009 Sep;94(5):1275-86 [PMID: 19702370]
  10. J Appl Psychol. 2010 May;95(3):582-91 [PMID: 20476836]
  11. J Appl Psychol. 2007 Nov;92(6):1709-21 [PMID: 18020807]
  12. J Appl Psychol. 2007 Jan;92(1):17-27 [PMID: 17227148]
  13. Adm Sci Q. 1978 Jun;23(2):224-53 [PMID: 10307892]
  14. J Appl Psychol. 2006 Nov;91(6):1189-207 [PMID: 17100478]

MeSH Term

China
Humans
Leadership
Longitudinal Studies
Negotiating
Self Efficacy
Workplace

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0behaviorvoiceparadoxicalleadershippsychologicalsafetyself-efficacypromotivetheorizedleader-memberinfluencesemployees'teamsizesubordinatesleadersadopttestedperspectivebeyondexistingstudiesemployeeproposedalsoextentinternalizeexhibitproactivelongitudinalstudyconducted15596supervisorsChinafoundemployeeslikelyengagehoweverprohibitivereducedparadoxesAdditionallymediatesrelationshipsignificantinteractioneffectsParadoxicalLeadershipAffectEmployees'VoiceBehaviorsWorkplace?Leader-MemberExchangePerspectiveexchangetheoryorganizationalcitizenship

Similar Articles

Cited By (7)