Laboratory evaluation of the optical properties of two extended-depth-of-focus intraocular lenses.

Sue Hey Chae, Hyeck Soo Son, Ramin Khoramnia, Kyung Heon Lee, Chul Young Choi
Author Information
  1. Sue Hey Chae: Sungmo Eye Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
  2. Hyeck Soo Son: The David J. Apple International Laboratory for Ocular Pathology and International Vision Correction Research Centre (IVCRC), Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  3. Ramin Khoramnia: The David J. Apple International Laboratory for Ocular Pathology and International Vision Correction Research Centre (IVCRC), Department of Ophthalmology, University of Heidelberg, Heidelberg, Germany.
  4. Kyung Heon Lee: Sungmo Eye Hospital, Busan, Republic of Korea.
  5. Chul Young Choi: Department of Ophthalmology, Kangbuk Samsung Hospital, Sungkyunkwan University School of Medicine, Pyeong-Dong, Jongno-Gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea. sashimi0@naver.com.

Abstract

BACKGROUND: To experimentally compare the optical performance of two different Extended-Depth-of-Focus (EDOF) intraocular lenses (IOLs) using a standardized optical bench set-up.
METHODS: In this experimental study, following IOLs were assessed: the TECNIS® Symfony ZXR00 (Johnson&Johnson, Santa Ana, USA) and the AT LARA 829MP (Carl Zeiss Meditec, Jena, Germany) IOLs. The through-focus modulation transfer function (MTF) values were measured at a spatial frequency of 50 lp/mm and at aperture sizes of 2, 3, and 4.5 mm. Each IOL was measured while centered using ISO 11979-2 Model 1 (aberration-free) and Model 2 (+ 0.28 μm spherical aberration) corneas. United States Air Force (USAF) target images were also recorded for a qualitative evaluation.
RESULTS: At 2 mm pupil with ISO1 cornea, the primary and secondary foci of both IOLs appeared to merge, providing an elongated depth of focus. At 3 and 4.5 mm pupil sizes, the through-focus MTF curves of both IOLs showed a bifocal-like V-pattern. While the Symfony IOL showed an overall superior MTF values when measured with the ISO2 cornea, the opposite propensity could be observed with the AT LARA IOL. This optical behavior could be qualitatively confirmed by the USAF target images.
CONCLUSIONS: Although the two EDOF IOLs share similarities in their optical properties, the main difference lies in their optical design and performance with respect to spherical aberration. Such characteristics should be taken into account during IOL and patient selection.

Keywords

References

  1. J Ophthalmol. 2018 Jan 31;2018:6165493 [PMID: 29651343]
  2. Biomed Opt Express. 2017 Aug 31;8(9):4294-4309 [PMID: 28966865]
  3. Graefes Arch Clin Exp Ophthalmol. 2016 Jul;254(7):1387-97 [PMID: 26671689]
  4. BMC Ophthalmol. 2017 Jun 29;17(1):108 [PMID: 28662629]
  5. Nature. 1987 Jan 29-Feb 4;325(6103):439-41 [PMID: 3808045]
  6. Ophthalmology. 2003 Sep;110(9):1789-98 [PMID: 13129879]
  7. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2007 Dec;33(12):2111-7 [PMID: 18053913]
  8. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2011 Jul;37(7):1305-12 [PMID: 21700107]
  9. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2003 Aug;29(8):1514-21 [PMID: 12954298]
  10. Asia Pac J Ophthalmol (Phila). 2017 Jul-Aug;6(4):339-349 [PMID: 28780781]
  11. Taiwan J Ophthalmol. 2017 Oct-Dec;7(4):179-184 [PMID: 29296549]
  12. J Refract Surg. 2016 Apr;32(4):273-80 [PMID: 27070236]
  13. J Refract Surg. 2003 Mar-Apr;19(2 Suppl):S270-4 [PMID: 12699188]
  14. Indian J Ophthalmol. 2017 Dec;65(12):1294-1300 [PMID: 29208809]
  15. J Refract Surg. 2018 Dec 1;34(12):832-838 [PMID: 30540366]
  16. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2013 Jul;39(7):1093-9 [PMID: 23692884]
  17. J Cataract Refract Surg. 2009 Jan;35(1):166-71 [PMID: 19101440]
  18. J Curr Ophthalmol. 2018 May 18;30(4):287-296 [PMID: 30555960]

MeSH Term

Cornea
Depth Perception
Humans
Lenses, Intraocular
Models, Theoretical
Optics and Photonics
Prosthesis Design
Pupil

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0opticalIOLsIOLtwolensesMTFmeasuredperformanceEDOFintraocularusingSymfonyATLARAthrough-focusvaluessizes2345 mmModelsphericalaberrationUSAFtargetimagesevaluationpupilcorneashowedpropertiesBACKGROUND:experimentallycomparedifferentExtended-Depth-of-Focusstandardizedbenchset-upMETHODS:experimentalstudyfollowingassessed:TECNIS®ZXR00Johnson&JohnsonSantaAnaUSA829MPCarlZeissMeditecJenaGermanymodulationtransferfunctionspatialfrequency50lp/mmaperturecenteredISO11979-21aberration-free+ 028 μmcorneasUnitedStatesAirForcealsorecordedqualitativeRESULTS:2 mmISO1primarysecondaryfociappearedmergeprovidingelongateddepthfocuscurvesbifocal-likeV-patternoverallsuperiorISO2oppositepropensityobservedbehaviorqualitativelyconfirmedCONCLUSIONS:AlthoughsharesimilaritiesmaindifferenceliesdesignrespectcharacteristicstakenaccountpatientselectionLaboratoryextended-depth-of-focusExtended-depth-of-focusIntraocularOpticalqualityPupilsize

Similar Articles

Cited By (18)