Knowledge, Attitudes, and Practices of Plagiarism as Reported by Participants Completing the AuthorAID MOOC on Research Writing.

Aamir Raoof Memon, Martina Mavrinac
Author Information
  1. Aamir Raoof Memon: Institute of Physiotherapy and Rehabilitation Sciences, Peoples University of Medical and Health Sciences for Women, Nawabshah, Sindh, Pakistan. memon.aamir.raoof@gmail.com. ORCID
  2. Martina Mavrinac: Department of Medical Informatics, Faculty of Medicine, University of Rijeka, Rijeka, Croatia.

Abstract

To explore the knowledge, attitudes and practices regarding plagiarism in a large culturally diverse sample of researchers who participated in the AuthorAID MOOC on Research Writing. An online survey was designed and delivered through Google Forms to the participants in the AuthorAID MOOC on Research Writing during April to June 2017. A total of 765 participants completed the survey (response rate 47.8%), and 746 responses were included in the analysis. Almost all participants (97.6%) reported knowledge of the term "plagiarism", and 89.1% of them understand the meaning of the term before joining the course. Most participants reported that their university does not provide access to plagiarism detection software (82.0%), and 35% participants admitted they had been involved in plagiarism during their education. Overall attitudes toward plagiarism (65.3 ± 10.93) indicated low acceptance of plagiarism. Moreover, low scores were reported for approval attitude (25.22 ± 5.63), disapproval attitude (11.78 ± 3.64), and knowledge of subjective norms (20.63 ± 5.22). The most common reason for plagiarizing was lack of time (16.1%), and the most common consequence was the perception that "those who plagiarize are not respected or seen positively" (71.4%). Developing country researchers appear to be familiar with the concept of plagiarism, but knowledge among the participants surveyed here was incomplete. Knowledge about plagiarism and awareness of its harmfulness must be improved, because there is an obvious relationship between attitudes toward plagiarism and knowledge, reasons and consequences. The use of plagiarism-detection software can raise awareness about plagiarism.

Keywords

References

  1. Croat Med J. 2006 Apr;47(2):220-7 [PMID: 16625685]
  2. J Pak Med Assoc. 2013 Nov;63(11):1446-7 [PMID: 24392541]
  3. AJNR Am J Neuroradiol. 2014 Sep;35(9):1653-4 [PMID: 24356674]
  4. Curr Med Res Opin. 2013 Feb;29(2):99-100 [PMID: 23210610]
  5. Am J Pharm Educ. 2009 Oct 1;73(6):105 [PMID: 19885074]
  6. J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Apr;32(4):557-560 [PMID: 28244278]
  7. Sci Eng Ethics. 2018 Oct;24(5):1409-1420 [PMID: 28889329]
  8. PLoS Med. 2013;10(3):e1001315 [PMID: 23555197]
  9. Sci Eng Ethics. 2008 Mar;14(1):139-47 [PMID: 17992584]
  10. Food Chem Toxicol. 2012 Oct;50(10):3385-7 [PMID: 22750724]
  11. Sci Eng Ethics. 2016 Oct;22(5):1447-1456 [PMID: 26520642]
  12. J Pak Med Assoc. 2010 Apr;60(4):269-73 [PMID: 20419968]
  13. Croat Med J. 2005 Feb;46(1):126-31 [PMID: 15726686]
  14. Korean J Fam Med. 2013 Nov;34(6):371 [PMID: 24340157]
  15. PLoS One. 2013 Jul 08;8(7):e68397 [PMID: 23861902]
  16. Croat Med J. 2011 Aug 15;52(4):576-7 [PMID: 21853553]
  17. J Pak Med Assoc. 2017 May;67(5):767-772 [PMID: 28507368]
  18. BMC Med Ethics. 2014 Mar 25;15:25 [PMID: 24666413]
  19. Curr Med Res Opin. 2012 Oct;28(10):1575-83 [PMID: 22978774]
  20. J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Aug;32(8):1220-1227 [PMID: 28665055]
  21. Acad Med. 2012 Jan;87(1):51-4 [PMID: 22104051]
  22. J Med Libr Assoc. 2014 Apr;102(2):87-91 [PMID: 24860263]
  23. Sci Eng Ethics. 2012 Jun;18(2):223-39 [PMID: 22207497]
  24. Sci Eng Ethics. 2015 Dec;21(6):1587-608 [PMID: 25377005]
  25. J Korean Med Sci. 2017 Feb;32(2):183-185 [PMID: 28049227]
  26. Croat Med J. 2010 Jun;51(3):195-201 [PMID: 20564761]
  27. PLoS Med. 2013 Dec;10(12):e1001574 [PMID: 24391477]
  28. PeerJ. 2015 Jun 18;3:e1031 [PMID: 26157615]
  29. J Korean Med Sci. 2016 Oct;31(10):1508-10 [PMID: 27550475]
  30. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2012 Oct 16;109(42):17028-33 [PMID: 23027971]
  31. Acta Med Iran. 2012;50(11):778-81 [PMID: 23292631]
  32. Med J Armed Forces India. 2016 Apr;72(2):164-7 [PMID: 27257327]
  33. Dev World Bioeth. 2010 Dec;10(3):164-71 [PMID: 19832885]
  34. Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Aug;23(4):1243-1246 [PMID: 27896604]
  35. BMJ Open. 2016 Nov 23;6(11):e012047 [PMID: 27881524]
  36. Curationis. 2012 Jun 20;35(1):27 [PMID: 23327765]
  37. J Tehran Heart Cent. 2010 Fall;5(4):169-71 [PMID: 23074587]
  38. Sci Eng Ethics. 2017 Apr;23(2):635-636 [PMID: 27432400]
  39. Urol Oncol. 2011 Jan-Feb;29(1):104-8 [PMID: 21194646]
  40. PLoS One. 2009 May 29;4(5):e5738 [PMID: 19478950]
  41. J Allied Health. 2006 Fall;35(3):179-85 [PMID: 17036675]
  42. J Pak Med Assoc. 2014 Nov;64(11):1329-30 [PMID: 25831661]

MeSH Term

Education, Distance
Health Knowledge, Attitudes, Practice
Humans
Knowledge
Plagiarism
Writing

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0plagiarismparticipantsknowledgeMOOCResearchattitudesAuthorAIDWritingreportedresearcherssurveyterm1%softwaretowardlowattitudecommonDevelopingKnowledgeawarenessPlagiarismexplorepracticesregardinglargeculturallydiversesampleparticipatedonlinedesigneddeliveredGoogleFormsAprilJune2017total765completedresponserate478%746responsesincludedanalysisAlmost976%"plagiarism"89understandmeaningjoiningcourseuniversityprovideaccessdetection820%35%admittedinvolvededucationOverall653 ± 1093indicatedacceptanceMoreoverscoresapproval2522 ± 563disapproval1178 ± 364subjectivenorms2063 ± 522reasonplagiarizinglacktime16consequenceperception"thoseplagiarizerespectedseenpositively"714%countryappearfamiliarconceptamongsurveyedincompleteharmfulnessmustimprovedobviousrelationshipreasonsconsequencesuseplagiarism-detectioncanraiseAttitudesPracticesReportedParticipantsCompletingcountriesOnlinelearningethics

Similar Articles

Cited By