On Four Types of Devaluation of Outcomes Due to Their Costs: Delay, Probability, Effort, and Social Discounting.

Wojciech Białaszek, Paweł Ostaszewski, Leonard Green, Joel Myerson
Author Information
  1. Wojciech Białaszek: SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Chodakowska 19/31, 03-815 Warszawa, Poland. ORCID
  2. Paweł Ostaszewski: SWPS University of Social Sciences and Humanities, Chodakowska 19/31, 03-815 Warszawa, Poland.
  3. Leonard Green: Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.
  4. Joel Myerson: Washington University, St. Louis, MO, USA.

Abstract

Discounting refers to decreases in the subjective value of an outcome with increases in some attribute of that outcome. The attributes most commonly studied are delay and probability, with far less research on effort and social discounting. Although these attributes all represent costs that reduce subjective value, it is as yet unclear how the extent to which they do so is related at the individual level. Accordingly, the present study examined the degree to which individual participants discounted hypothetical monetary rewards on each of four discounting tasks in which the delay, probability, effort, and number of people with whom the money was to be shared were manipulated. At the group level, larger amounts were discounted less steeply than smaller amounts when delay and effort were varied, whereas larger amounts were discounted more steeply when probability and number of people were varied. At the individual level, the correlational pattern was examined using exploratory factor analysis. A six-factor structure (with separate factors for delay and effort, and two factors each for social and probability discounting) described the relations among indifference points. At a more molar level, a two-factor structure, which corresponded to the direction of the observed magnitude effects, described the relations among area-under-the-curve measures of discounting in the eight conditions resulting from crossing two monetary amounts with the four cost factors. We conclude that despite sharing some similarities, individual and group differences in discounting involving the different types of costs reflect mostly separate processes and traits.

Keywords

References

  1. Psychol Sci. 2007 Jan;18(1):58-63 [PMID: 17362379]
  2. Behav Processes. 2011 May;87(1):1-9 [PMID: 21385637]
  3. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1999 Mar;25(2):418-27 [PMID: 10093208]
  4. Exp Clin Psychopharmacol. 2006 Aug;14(3):318-28 [PMID: 16893275]
  5. J Exp Anal Behav. 2001 Sep;76(2):235-43 [PMID: 11599641]
  6. Behav Processes. 2003 Oct 31;64(3):355-367 [PMID: 14580704]
  7. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2011 Aug;216(3):305-21 [PMID: 21373791]
  8. Addiction. 2017 Jan;112(1):51-62 [PMID: 27450931]
  9. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 1999 Oct;146(4):455-64 [PMID: 10550496]
  10. PLoS One. 2017 Jul 31;12(7):e0182353 [PMID: 28759631]
  11. Behav Processes. 2003 Oct 31;64(3):333-344 [PMID: 14580702]
  12. J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Jan;99(1):3-13 [PMID: 23344985]
  13. Behav Processes. 2011 Jul;87(3):253-9 [PMID: 21550384]
  14. Behav Pharmacol. 2012 Aug;23(4):358-66 [PMID: 22743602]
  15. J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Jan;91(1):61-73 [PMID: 19230512]
  16. Neuro Endocrinol Lett. 2009;30(6):749-52 [PMID: 20038936]
  17. J Exp Anal Behav. 2009 Jul;92(1):1-16 [PMID: 20119519]
  18. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 1996 May;22(3):771-91 [PMID: 8656156]
  19. Behav Processes. 2004 Jan 30;65(1):35-42 [PMID: 14744545]
  20. Am J Psychol. 2014 Summer;127(2):215-31 [PMID: 24934012]
  21. J Gen Psychol. 2010 Jul-Sep;137(3):273-86 [PMID: 20718227]
  22. Behav Res Methods Instrum Comput. 2000 Aug;32(3):396-402 [PMID: 11029811]
  23. J Exp Anal Behav. 2006 May;85(3):425-35 [PMID: 16776060]
  24. Behav Processes. 2008 Oct;79(2):120-3 [PMID: 18625292]
  25. J Exp Anal Behav. 2013 Nov;100(3):269-81 [PMID: 24037826]
  26. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2016 Jul;233(14):2705-14 [PMID: 27180181]
  27. J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn. 2015 Jan;41(1):148-62 [PMID: 24933696]
  28. J Exp Anal Behav. 2011 Mar;95(2):175-87 [PMID: 21541126]
  29. J Exp Anal Behav. 1991 Mar;55(2):233-44 [PMID: 2037827]
  30. Multivariate Behav Res. 1966 Apr 1;1(2):245-76 [PMID: 26828106]

Grants

  1. R01 AG058885/NIA NIH HHS

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0discountingdelayprobabilityeffortindividuallevelamountsdiscountedfactorsDiscountingsubjectivevalueoutcomeattributeslesssocialcostsexaminedmonetaryfournumberpeoplegrouplargersteeplyvariedanalysisstructureseparatetwodescribedrelationsamongDelayProbabilityEffortSocialrefersdecreasesincreasesattributecommonlystudiedfarresearchAlthoughrepresentreduceyetunclearextentrelatedAccordinglypresentstudydegreeparticipantshypotheticalrewardstasksmoneysharedmanipulatedsmallerwhereascorrelationalpatternusingexploratoryfactorsix-factorindifferencepointsmolartwo-factorcorrespondeddirectionobservedmagnitudeeffectsarea-under-the-curvemeasureseightconditionsresultingcrossingcostconcludedespitesharingsimilaritiesdifferencesinvolvingdifferenttypesreflectmostlyprocessestraitsFourTypesDevaluationOutcomesDueCosts:FactorMagnitudeeffect

Similar Articles

Cited By