Transcription Factor Binding in Embryonic Stem Cells Is Constrained by DNA Sequence Repeat Symmetry.

Matan Goldshtein, Meir Mellul, Gai Deutch, Masahiko Imashimizu, Koh Takeuchi, Eran Meshorer, Oren Ram, David B Lukatsky
Author Information
  1. Matan Goldshtein: Avram and Stella Goldstein-Goren Department of Biotechnology Engineering, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
  2. Meir Mellul: Department of Biological Chemistry, The Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
  3. Gai Deutch: Department of Chemistry, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel.
  4. Masahiko Imashimizu: Molecular Profiling Research Center for Drug Discovery, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
  5. Koh Takeuchi: Molecular Profiling Research Center for Drug Discovery, National Institute of Advanced Industrial Science and Technology, Tokyo, Japan.
  6. Eran Meshorer: Department of Genetics, The Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel; The Edmond and Lily Safra Center for Brain Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel.
  7. Oren Ram: Department of Biological Chemistry, The Institute of Life Sciences, The Hebrew University of Jerusalem, Jerusalem, Israel. Electronic address: oren.ram@mail.huji.ac.il.
  8. David B Lukatsky: Department of Chemistry, Ben-Gurion University of the Negev, Beer-Sheva, Israel. Electronic address: lukatsky@bgu.ac.il.

Abstract

Transcription factor (TF) recognition is dictated by the underlying DNA motif sequence specific for each TF. Here, we reveal that DNA sequence repeat symmetry plays a central role in defining TF-DNA-binding preferences. In particular, we find that different TFs bind similar symmetry patterns in the context of different developmental layers. Most TFs possess dominant preferences for similar DNA repeat symmetry types. However, in some cases, preferences of specific TFs are changed during differentiation, suggesting the importance of information encoded outside of known motif regions. Histone modifications also exhibit strong preferences for similar DNA repeat symmetry patterns unique to each type of modification. Next, using an in vivo reporter assay, we show that gene expression in embryonic stem cells can be positively modulated by the presence of genomic and computationally designed DNA oligonucleotides containing identified nonconsensus-repetitive sequence elements. This supports the hypothesis that certain nonconsensus-repetitive patterns possess a functional ability to regulate gene expression. We also performed a solution NMR experiment to probe the stability of double-stranded DNA via imino proton resonances for several double-stranded DNA sequences characterized by different repetitive patterns. We suggest that such local stability might play a key role in determining TF-DNA binding preferences. Overall, our findings show that despite the enormous sequence complexity of the TF-DNA binding landscape in differentiating embryonic stem cells, this landscape can be quantitatively characterized in simple terms using the notion of DNA sequence repeat symmetry.

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 9;111(49):17344-5 [PMID: 25468983]
  2. Trends Biochem Sci. 2014 Sep;39(9):381-99 [PMID: 25129887]
  3. Biophys J. 2011 Jul 6;101(1):160-6 [PMID: 21723826]
  4. Nucleic Acids Res. 2014 Jun;42(11):7039-46 [PMID: 24838572]
  5. Genes (Basel). 2017 Aug 07;8(8): [PMID: 28783137]
  6. Nat Biotechnol. 2015 Nov;33(11):1165-72 [PMID: 26458175]
  7. Nat Struct Mol Biol. 2012 Nov;19(11):1185-92 [PMID: 23085715]
  8. Nature. 2015 Feb 19;518(7539):344-9 [PMID: 25693565]
  9. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Apr 17;115(16):E3702-E3711 [PMID: 29588420]
  10. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2014 Dec 2;111(48):17140-5 [PMID: 25313048]
  11. Biochem Pharmacol. 2006 Nov 30;72(11):1563-9 [PMID: 16836980]
  12. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2016 Nov 22;113(47):E7409-E7417 [PMID: 27830653]
  13. Genome Res. 2018 Jan 11;: [PMID: 29326300]
  14. Genome Res. 2016 Jun;26(6):778-86 [PMID: 27197208]
  15. Biophys J. 2017 May 23;112(10):2047-2050 [PMID: 28479135]
  16. Nature. 2016 Feb 4;530(7588):113-6 [PMID: 26814966]
  17. Brief Funct Genomic Proteomic. 2006 Sep;5(3):209-21 [PMID: 16877467]
  18. EMBO Rep. 2002 Mar;3(3):224-9 [PMID: 11882541]
  19. Annu Rev Biophys Biomol Struct. 2007;36:79-105 [PMID: 17477836]
  20. Cell Rep. 2013 Apr 25;3(4):1093-104 [PMID: 23562153]
  21. Genome Res. 2018 Apr;28(4):497-508 [PMID: 29563167]
  22. PLoS One. 2016 Feb 11;11(2):e0149339 [PMID: 26866362]
  23. Nature. 1987 Jul 2-8;328(6125):89-92 [PMID: 3037381]

MeSH Term

Base Sequence
Binding Sites
Embryonic Stem Cells
Protein Binding
Transcription Factors

Chemicals

Transcription Factors

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0DNAsequencesymmetrypreferencesrepeatpatternsdifferentTFssimilarTranscriptionTFmotifspecificrolepossessalsousingshowgeneexpressionembryonicstemcellscannonconsensus-repetitivestabilitydouble-strandedcharacterizedTF-DNAbindinglandscapefactorrecognitiondictatedunderlyingrevealplayscentraldefiningTF-DNA-bindingparticularfindbindcontextdevelopmentallayersdominanttypesHowevercaseschangeddifferentiationsuggestingimportanceinformationencodedoutsideknownregionsHistonemodificationsexhibitstronguniquetypemodificationNextin vivoreporterassaypositivelymodulatedpresencegenomiccomputationallydesignedoligonucleotidescontainingidentifiedelementssupportshypothesiscertainfunctionalabilityregulateperformedsolutionNMRexperimentprobeviaiminoprotonresonancesseveralsequencesrepetitivesuggestlocalmightplaykeydeterminingOverallfindingsdespiteenormouscomplexitydifferentiatingquantitativelysimpletermsnotionFactorBindingEmbryonicStemCellsConstrainedSequenceRepeatSymmetry

Similar Articles

Cited By (6)