Marmoset prosociality is intentional.

Judith M Burkart, Carel P van Schaik
Author Information
  1. Judith M Burkart: Department of Anthropology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland. judith.burkart@aim.uzh.ch.
  2. Carel P van Schaik: Department of Anthropology, University of Zurich, Winterthurerstrasse 190, 8057, Zürich, Switzerland.

Abstract

Marmoset monkeys show high levels of proactive prosociality, a trait shared with humans, presumably because both species rely on allomaternal care. However, it is not clear whether the proximate regulation of this convergent trait is also similar, in particular with regard to intentionality, which is a defining characteristic of prosocial behavior in the human literature. The aim of this paper was to investigate whether marmoset monkeys' prosociality fulfils the criteria of intentionality developed in primate communication research. The results show that marmoset prosocial behavior (i) has some degree of flexibility, since individuals can use multiple means to reach their goal and adjust them to specific conditions, (ii) depends on the presence of an audience, i.e. potential recipients (social use), and (iii) is goal-directed, because (a) it continues exactly until the putative goal is reached, and (b) individuals check back and look at/for their partner when their prosocial actions do not achieve the putative goal (i.e. if their actions don't lead to the expected outcome, this elicits distinct reactions in the actor). These results suggest that marmoset prosociality is under some degree of voluntary, intentional control. They are in line with other findings that marmosets perceive each other as intentional agents, and only learn socially from actions that are perceived as intentional. The most parsimonious conclusion is, therefore, that prosocial behavior is fundamentally under voluntary control in marmosets, just as it is in humans, even though our more sophisticated cognitive abilities allow for a far more complex integration of prosociality into a broader variety of contexts and of behavioral goals.

Keywords

References

  1. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2007 Dec 11;104(50):19762-6 [PMID: 18077409]
  2. Anim Behav. 2007 Feb;73(2):281-286 [PMID: 17389908]
  3. Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2017 Aug;92(3):1427-1433 [PMID: 27480784]
  4. Nat Commun. 2014 Aug 27;5:4747 [PMID: 25158760]
  5. J Comp Psychol. 2019 Nov;133(4):474-487 [PMID: 30985161]
  6. Behav Processes. 2014 Nov;109 Pt A:27-33 [PMID: 25010563]
  7. Science. 2007 Sep 7;317(5843):1402-5 [PMID: 17823353]
  8. Am J Primatol. 2018 Oct;80(10):e22919 [PMID: 30281814]
  9. Anim Cogn. 2016 Jul;19(4):679-705 [PMID: 27000780]
  10. Evol Psychol. 2013 Jul 18;11(3):538-49 [PMID: 23864293]
  11. Dev Sci. 2009 Nov;12(6):938-45 [PMID: 19840049]
  12. J Comp Psychol. 2013 May;127(2):212-25 [PMID: 22250970]
  13. Cognition. 1998 Nov;69(1):1-34 [PMID: 9871370]
  14. Curr Biol. 2014 Jul 21;24(14):1596-1600 [PMID: 24998524]
  15. Proc Biol Sci. 2011 Apr 22;278(1709):1189-94 [PMID: 20926437]
  16. Evol Anthropol. 2017 Jan;26(1):25-37 [PMID: 28233388]
  17. Curr Dir Psychol Sci. 2009 Feb 1;18(1):53-57 [PMID: 23645974]
  18. Child Dev. 2005 Jan-Feb;76(1):291-306 [PMID: 15693773]
  19. Anim Cogn. 2013 Mar;16(2):187-96 [PMID: 23053796]
  20. Behav Ecol. 2011 Jul;22(4):745-754 [PMID: 22479136]
  21. Curr Biol. 2008 Feb 12;18(3):227-32 [PMID: 18221878]
  22. Am J Primatol. 2007 Sep;69(9):955-65 [PMID: 17294426]
  23. Horm Behav. 2015 May;71:83-90 [PMID: 25934057]
  24. Behav Brain Res. 2013 Jun 1;246:47-54 [PMID: 23454673]
  25. Am J Primatol. 2003 Jan;59(1):21-8 [PMID: 12526036]
  26. Psychol Sci. 2018 Jun;29(6):984-995 [PMID: 29702031]
  27. Anim Cogn. 2010 Nov;13(6):793-804 [PMID: 20563619]
  28. Nat Commun. 2013;4:1765 [PMID: 23612306]
  29. Biol Lett. 2018 Mar;14(3): [PMID: 29593076]
  30. Am J Primatol. 1993;31(3):211-221 [PMID: 31936996]
  31. J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol. 2011 Apr;197(4):329-37 [PMID: 21225271]
  32. Proc Biol Sci. 2006 Apr 22;273(1589):1013-21 [PMID: 16627288]
  33. Annu Rev Psychol. 2019 Jan 4;70:347-371 [PMID: 30231001]
  34. Science. 1965 Jul 16;149(3681):269-74 [PMID: 14300526]
  35. Child Dev. 2016 Nov;87(6):1668-1678 [PMID: 28262941]
  36. Psychol Bull. 1987 Jan;101(1):91-119 [PMID: 3562705]
  37. Dev Sci. 2004 Sep;7(4):488-98 [PMID: 15484596]
  38. Nature. 2005 Oct 27;437(7063):1357-9 [PMID: 16251965]
  39. Behav Processes. 2007 Oct;76(2):138-41 [PMID: 17703900]
  40. PLoS One. 2013 Oct 16;8(10):e76674 [PMID: 24146908]
  41. Physiol Behav. 2017 May 1;173:79-86 [PMID: 28115225]
  42. J Comp Psychol. 2012 May;126(2):129-38 [PMID: 22103235]
  43. Horm Behav. 2016 Apr;80:10-18 [PMID: 26836769]

Grants

  1. This work was supported by the Swiss N projects 310030-13083 and 105312-114107/Schweizerischer Nationalfonds zur Förderung der Wissenschaftlichen Forschung

MeSH Term

Animals
Behavior, Animal
Callithrix
Cooperative Behavior
Humans
Motivation
Social Behavior

Word Cloud

Created with Highcharts 10.0.0prosocialityprosocialintentionalbehaviormarmosetgoalactionsmarmosetsMarmosetshowtraithumanswhetherresultsdegreeindividualsuseieputativevoluntarycontrolmonkeyshighlevelsproactivesharedpresumablyspeciesrelyallomaternalcareHoweverclearproximateregulationconvergentalsosimilarparticularregardintentionalitydefiningcharacteristichumanliteratureaimpaperinvestigatemonkeys'fulfilscriteriaof intentionalitydevelopedin primatecommunicationresearchflexibilitysincecanmultiplemeansreachadjustspecificconditionsiidependspresenceaudiencepotentialrecipientssocialiiigoal-directedcontinuesexactlyreachedbcheckbacklookat/forpartnerachieveleadexpectedoutcomeelicitsdistinctreactionsactorsuggestlinefindingsperceiveagentslearnsociallyperceivedparsimoniousconclusionthereforefundamentallyjusteventhoughsophisticatedcognitiveabilitiesallowfarcomplexintegrationbroadervarietycontextsbehavioralgoalsAudienceeffectsCommoncallithrixjacchusFlexibilityGoal-directednessIntentionalityProactive

Similar Articles

Cited By